Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Separating representation, reasoning, and implementation for interaction management: Lessons from automated planning

By Mary Ellen Foster and Ronald P.A. Petrick

Abstract

Numerous toolkits are available for developing speech-based\ud dialogue systems. We survey a range of currently available toolkits, highlighting\ud the different facilities provided by each. Most of these toolkits\ud include not only a method for representing states and actions, but also a\ud mechanism for reasoning and selecting the actions, often combined with a\ud technical framework designed to simplify the task of creating end-to-end\ud systems. This near-universal tight coupling of representation, reasoning,\ud and implementation in a single toolkit makes it difficult both to compare\ud different approaches to dialogue system design, as well as to analyse the\ud properties of individual techniques. We contrast this situation with the\ud state of the art in a related research area|automated planning|where\ud a set of common representations have been defined and are widely used\ud to enable direct comparison of different reasoning approaches. We argue\ud that adopting a similar separation would greatly benefit the dialogue\ud research community

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2016
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:123308
Provided by: Enlighten
Sorry, our data provider has not provided any external links therefore we are unable to provide a link to the full text.

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.