Location of Repository

Inverse problems are often ill posed, with solutions that depend sensitively on data. In any numerical approach to the solution of such problems, regularization of some form is needed to counteract the resulting instability. This paper is based on an approach to regularization, employing a Bayesian formulation of the problem, which leads to a notion of well posedness for inverse problems, at the level of probability measures. The stability which results from this well posedness may be used as the basis for quantifying the approximation, in finite dimensional spaces, of inverse problems for functions. This paper contains a theory which utilizes this stability property to estimate the distance between the true and approximate posterior distributions, in the Hellinger metric, in terms of error estimates for approximation of the underlying forward problem. This is potentially useful as it allows for the transfer of estimates from the numerical analysis of forward problems into estimates for the solution of the related inverse problem. It is noteworthy that, when the prior is a Gaussian random field model, controlling differences in the Hellinger metric leads to control on the differences between expected values of polynomially bounded functions and operators, including the mean and covariance operator. The ideas are applied to some non-Gaussian inverse problems where the goal is determination of the initial condition for the Stokes or Navier–Stokes equation from Lagrangian and Eulerian observations, respectively

Topics:
QA

Publisher: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

Year: 2010

OAI identifier:
oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:3313

Provided by:
Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository

- (2008). A .A p t e ,C .K .R .T .J o n e s ,A .M .S t u a r t ,a n dJ .V o s s , Data assimilation: Mathematical and statistical perspectives,
- (2009). A simple proof of uniqueness of the particle trajectories for solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations,
- (1993). A study of uniqueness for the initialiazation problem for burgers’
- (1996). An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Inverse Problems,
- (2007). Approximation errors in nonstationary inverse problems,
- (2010). Bayesian inverse problems for functions and applications to ﬂuid mechanics,
- (2007). Convergence rates for sparse chaos approximations of elliptic problems with stochastic coeﬃcients,
- (2007). Convergence rates for the Bayesian approach to linear inverse problems,
- (2008). Convergence results for the Bayesian inversion theory,
- (2003). Data assimilation: Aims and basic concepts, Data Assimilation for the Earth System,
- (1998). Gaussian Measures,
- (2007). Introduction to bayesian scientiﬁc computing,
- (2005). Inverse Problem Theory.
- (2010). Inverse problems: A Bayesian approach,
- (2006). Karhunen-Loeve approximation of random ﬁelds in domains by generalized fast multipole methods,
- (2006). Kolehmainen,M .S c h w e i g e r ,E .S o m e r s a l o ,a n dT .T a r -vainen, Approximation errors and model reduction with an application to optical diﬀusion tomography,
- (1989). Linear inverse problems for generalized random variables,
- (2001). Monte Carlo strategies in scientiﬁc computing, Springer Texts in Statistics,
- (1995). Navier-Stokes equations and nonlinear functional analysis,
- (2001). Navier-Stokes equations. AMS
- (1983). Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Diﬀerential Equations,
- (2006). State estimation approach to nonstationary inverse problems: Discretization error and ﬁltering problem,
- (2005). Statistical and computational inverse problems,
- (2007). Statistical inverse problems: Discretization, model reduction and inverse crimes,
- (1992). Stochastic equations in inﬁnite dimensions, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 44,
- (1989). Stochastic ﬁnite element expansion for random media,J
- (2003). Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach,
- (1997). Uniﬁed notation for assimilation: Operational, sequential and variational,
- (1970). Well-posed stochastic extensions of ill posed linear problems,
- (1998). When are quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms eﬃcient for highdimensional integrals?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.