Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Competing risks, left truncation and late entry effect in A-bomb survivors cohort

By J. Anzures-Cabrera and Jane Hutton


The cohort under study comprises A-bomb survivors residing in Hiroshima Prefecture since 1968. After this year, thousands of survivors were newly recognized every year. The aim of this study is to determine whether the survival experience of the late entrants to the cohort is significantly different from the registered population in 1968. Parametric models that account for left truncation and competing risks were developed by using sub-hazard functions. A Weibull distribution was used to determine the possible existence of a late entry effect in Hiroshima A-bomb survivors. The competing risks framework shows that there might be a late entry effect in the male and female groups. Our findings are congruent with previous studies analysing similar populations

Topics: D1, RA
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1984). Analysis of Survival Data, doi
  2. (1968). Cancer mortality risk among early entrants,
  3. (2004). Choice of time-scale in Cox’s model analysis of epidemiologic cohort datea: A simulation study, doi
  4. (2001). Classical Competing Risks, Chapman and Hall/CRC, doi
  5. (2006). Competing Risks. A Practical Perspective, doi
  6. (1996). Estimation of radiation doses for atomic bomb survivors in the Hiroshima university registrey, doi
  7. (2005). Modeling late entry bias in survival analysis, doi
  8. (1994). Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research, doi
  9. (2003). Sociology as Applied to
  10. (1996). Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors. doi
  11. (1999). Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors. Report 12, Part II. Noncancer mortality: 1950–1990, doi
  12. (1997). Survival analysis in observational studies, doi
  13. (1978). The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks, doi
  14. (1980). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, JohnWiley and Sons,
  15. (1997). Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.