Location of Repository

An analysis of the environment and competitive dynamics of management research

By Howard Thomas and Alexander David Wilson

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper examines some of the controversies facing business schools in their future evolution and pays particular attention to their competitive positioning as centres of management research. \ud \ud Design/methodology/approach – The paper combines and builds on current literature to provide an analytic overview of the environment and competitive challenges to management research in business schools. \ud \ud Findings – The paper assesses the impacts of a globalized environment and ever-changing competitive dynamics, for example in terms of the supply of high-quality faculty, on the activity of management research in business schools. It points out that research impacts must be judged not only in terms of theoretical development but also managerial and policy impact. However, managerial impact is difficult to measure and the “voice of practice” must be carefully identified. \ud \ud Originality/value – The paper identifies the current challenges for undertaking innovative research in business schools in light of their competitive environment. Three interrelated conjectures focusing particularly on managerial impact are raised which identify problems and limitations of current debates on management research in business schools

Topics: HF, HD28
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:3350

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2006). 2005 presidential address - Is there such a thing as "evidence-based management"?" doi
  2. (2008). A Clear Sense of Purpose? The Evolving Role of the Business School." doi
  3. (2007). A Modest Proposal: How We Might Change the Process and Product of Managerial Research." doi
  4. (2007). An Analysis of the Environment and Competitive Dynamics of Management Education." doi
  5. (2004). Are managers from Mars and academicians from venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance." doi
  6. (2007). Educating Managers From an Evidence-Based Perspective. doi
  7. (2002). Essai: On Paragrammatic Uses of Organizational Theory A Provocation." doi
  8. (1994). Experiments in entrepreneurship education: Successes and failures." doi
  9. (2007). Final Report of the AACSB International: Impact of Research:
  10. (1975). Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B." doi
  11. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: the social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. doi
  12. (2006). Getting on board" with AMJ: Balancing quality and innovation in the review process." doi
  13. (2008). Global Contests in the Production of Business Knowledge: Regional Centres and Individual Business Schools." Long Range Planning doi
  14. (1998). Gravy training : inside the world's top business schools.
  15. (2005). Herbert A. Simon : the bounds of reason in modern America. doi
  16. (2005). How Business Schools Lost Their Way."
  17. (2006). Knowledge for Theory and Practice."
  18. (1985). Lake Wobegon days,
  19. (2006). Light on their feet.
  20. (2009). Management Research and the New Logics of Discovery and Engagement." doi
  21. (1967). Managers and their jobs: a study of the similarities and differences in the ways managers spend their time,
  22. (2004). Managers Not MBAs. doi
  23. (1986). Managing the resource allocation process : a study of corporate planning and investment. doi
  24. (1997). Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education." doi
  25. (1977). Organizational behaviour in its context : the Aston programme III. doi
  26. (1976). Organizational structure extensions and replications : the Aston programme II. doi
  27. (1976). Organizational structure in its context : the Aston programme 1. doi
  28. (1998). Rationality in an uncertain world : essays on the cognitive science of human reasoning. doi
  29. (2004). Reinventing Business Schools: The Contribution of Critical Management Education." doi
  30. (2005). Strategy: Analysis and Practice.
  31. (2007). Suppose We Took Evidence-Based Management Seriously: Implications for Reading and Writing Management." doi
  32. Sutton (2006a). Evidence-Based Management. Harvard Business Review,
  33. Sutton (2006b). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense : profiting from evidence-based management. doi
  34. (2007). The business school and the bottom line. Cambridge, doi
  35. (1974). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. doi
  36. (2007). The Competitive (Dis)Advantages of European Business Schools." Long Range Planning doi
  37. (1997). The Double Hurdles for Management Research. Advancement in organizational behaviour : essays in honour of
  38. (2002). The End of Business Schools? Less Success than Meets the Eye." doi
  39. (2008). The Future Challenges of Business: Rethinking Management Education." doi
  40. (2005). The Future of Business Schools." doi
  41. (1990). The Machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. doi
  42. (1973). The nature of managerial work, doi
  43. (2003). The politics of publication - Authors, reviewers and editors must act to protect the quality of research."
  44. (2007). The Rankings Game: and the Winner is..." doi
  45. (2000). The rise of the network society. doi
  46. (1986). Top decisions : strategic decision making in organizations. doi
  47. (2003). What's the big idea?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.