Location of Repository

Embedding effective depression care : using theory for primary care organisational and systems change

By Jane Gunn, Victoria J. Palmer, Christopher Dowrick, Helen Herrman, Frances Griffiths, Renata Kokanovic, Grant Blashki, Kelsey Hegarty, Caroline L. Johnson, Maria Potiriadis and Carl May

Abstract

Background\ud Depression and related disorders represent a significant part of general practitioners (GPs) daily work. Implementing the evidence about what works for depression care into routine practice presents a challenge for researchers and service designers. The emerging consensus is that the transfer of efficacious interventions into routine practice is strongly linked to how well the interventions are based upon theory and take into account the contextual factors of the setting into which they are to be transferred. We set out to develop a conceptual framework to guide change and the implementation of best practice depression care in the primary care setting.\ud \ud Methods\ud We used a mixed method, observational approach to gather data about routine depression care in a range of primary care settings via: audit of electronic health records; observation of routine clinical care; and structured, facilitated whole of organisation meetings. Audit data were summarised using simple descriptive statistics. Observational data were collected using field notes. Organisational meetings were audio taped and transcribed. All the data sets were grouped, by organisation, and considered as a whole case. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) was identified as an analytical theory to guide the conceptual framework development.\ud \ud Results\ud Five privately owned primary care organisations (general practices) and one community health centre took part over the course of 18 months. We successfully developed a conceptual framework for implementing an effective model of depression care based on the four constructs of NPT: coherence, which proposes that depression work requires the conceptualisation of boundaries of who is depressed and who is not depressed and techniques for dealing with diffuseness; cognitive participation, which proposes that depression work requires engagement with a shared set of techniques that deal with depression as a health problem; collective action, which proposes that agreement is reached about how care is organised; and reflexive monitoring, which proposes that depression work requires agreement about how depression work will be monitored at the patient and practice level. We describe how these constructs can be used to guide the design and implementation of effective depression care in a way that can take account of contextual differences.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud Ideas about what is required for an effective model and system of depression care in primary care need to be accompanied by theoretically informed frameworks that consider how these can be implemented. The conceptual framework we have presented can be used to guide organisational and system change to develop common language around each construct between policy makers, service users, professionals, and researchers. This shared understanding across groups is fundamental to the effective implementation of change in primary care for depression.\u

Topics: RC
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:3358

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2006). A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care.
  2. (2005). A: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care doi
  3. (2010). APPC: Australian Primary Care Collaboratives. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
  4. (2008). Beyond the limits of clinical governance? The case of mental health in English primary care. BMC Health Services Research doi
  5. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences. doi
  6. (2006). Costs and consequences of enhanced primary care for depression - Systematic review of randomised economic evaluations. doi
  7. (2007). der Feltz-Cornelis CM: Cost-effectiveness of collaborative care including PST and an antidepressant treatment algorithm for the treatment of major depressive disorder in primary care; a randomised clinical trial. BMC Health Serv Res doi
  8. (2006). Developing a U.K.protocol for collaborative care: a qualitative study. General Hospital Psychiatry doi
  9. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ doi
  10. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Text Revision ed Washington DC: doi
  11. (2008). Dowrick C: Capturing complexity: The case for a new classification system for mental disorders in primary care. European Psychiatry doi
  12. (2010). Dowrick C: Diverse Voices, Simple Desires: A conceptual design for primary care to respond to depression and related disorders. Fam Pract doi
  13. (1996). E: A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of depression in primary care. Archives of General Psychiatry doi
  14. (2009). Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology doi
  15. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ
  16. (2008). From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Applied Psychology doi
  17. (2006). G: A systematic review of complex system interventions designed to increase recovery from depression in primary care.
  18. (2008). Gilbody S: Collaborative care for depression in UK primary care: a randomised control trial. Psychological Medicine doi
  19. (2005). Gilbody S: Managing common mental health disorders in primary care: Conceptual models and evidence base. doi
  20. (2009). Glasziou P: Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. The Lancet doi
  21. (2006). Handbook of Action Research. Concise Paperback ed London: doi
  22. (2008). Improving the outcomes of primary care attenders with common mental disorders in developing countries: a cluster randomized controlled trial of a collaborative stepped care intervention in Goa, India. Trials doi
  23. (2001). Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: A Framework for Change. The Millbank Quarterly doi
  24. (1998). KC: Primary Care Practice Organization and Preventive Services Delivery: A Qualitative Analysis.
  25. (1998). KC: Understanding Change in Primary Care Practice Using Complexity Theory.
  26. (2001). KC: Understanding practice from the ground up.
  27. (1997). Ludman E: Collaborative management to achieve depression treatment guidelines. doi
  28. (2009). NHHRC: A Healthier Future for all Australians. Canberra: National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission
  29. (2007). Process evaluation for complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model. BMC Family Practice doi
  30. (2005). RR: Case Study Research: The View From Complexity Science. Qualitative Health Research
  31. (2009). S: Learning to see: lessons from a participatory observation research project in public spaces. doi
  32. (2004). Stange KC: A Practice Change Model for Quality Improvement.
  33. (2007). T: Qualitative study of depression management in primary care: GP and patient goals, and the value of listening. doi
  34. (2001). The DOPC Writing Group: Conducting the Direct Observation of Primary Care Study: Insights from the process of conducting multimethod transdisciplinary research in community practice.
  35. (2002). Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A personal, experential experience. Qualitative Social Work doi
  36. (2009). V: Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implementation Science doi
  37. (2001). WHO: The World Health Report doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.