Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Daughters and left-wing voting

By Andrew J. Oswald and Nattavudh Powdthavee

Abstract

What determines human beings' political preferences? Using nationally representative longitudinal data, we show that having daughters makes people more likely to vote for left-wing political parties. Having sons leads people to favor right-wing parties. The paper checks that our result is not an artifact of family stopping rules, discusses the predictions from a simple economic model, and tests for possible reverse causality.\u

Topics: HQ, JN101, JA
Publisher: MIT Press
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:3381

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005). A Missing Level in the Analyses of British Voting Behavior: The Household as Context as Shown by Analyses of a 1992–1997 doi
  2. Adapt? Longitudinal Evidence on Disability with Implications for Economists and doi
  3. and the Calculation of Compensatory Damages,” doi
  4. (1999). Child Rearing as a Mechanism for Social Change: The Relationship doi
  5. (1998). Children and Their Parents’ Labor Supply: Evidence from Exogenous Variation in Family Size,” doi
  6. (1998). Deconstructing the Gender Gap,” paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting
  7. (2008). Do Daughters Make You Left Wing? Evidence from Australia,” Australian National University mimeograph
  8. (1976). Do Sex Preferences Really doi
  9. (2005). Does It Really Matter If Men Dominate Politics?” University of Essex working paper
  10. (1991). Does the Sex ofYour Children Matter? Support for Feminism among Women and Men in the United States and Canada,” doi
  11. (2005). Egocentric Economic Voting and Changes doi
  12. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior (Cambridge: doi
  13. (1998). Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and
  14. (2005). Engineers Have More Sons, Nurses Have More Daughters: An Evolutionary Psychological Extension of Baron-Cohen’s Extreme Male Brain Theory of Autism and Its Empirical Implications,” doi
  15. (2004). Family Matters: How Daughters Affect Their Legislator Fathers’ Voting on Women’s Issues,” Yale University working paper doi
  16. (2005). Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial DecisionMaking in
  17. (1985). Further Results on Daughters and Left-Wing Voting:
  18. (2005). How DaughtersAffect Their Legislator Fathers’ Voting on Women’s Issues,”Yale University working paper
  19. (2004). Ideology and Issue Preference: Is There Such a Thing as a Political Women’s Interest in doi
  20. (2002). in British Politics Today (Cambridge: doi
  21. (2000). Inconsistent Individual Attitudes within ConsistentAttitudinal Structures: Comments on an Important Issue Raised by John Bartle’s Paper on Causal Modelling of Voting in doi
  22. (1948). Intra-Sexual Selection in doi
  23. (2003). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation,” doi
  24. (2006). Left-Wing Voting,” IZA discussion paper 2103,
  25. (2005). Partner Plus Children Equals Happiness? doi
  26. (2005). Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of doi
  27. (1999). Sex Ratios, and Marriage Patterns,” doi
  28. (1998). Sons, Daughters, and the Risk of Marital Disruption,” doi
  29. (2005). The Demand for Sons,” unpublished paper, doi
  30. (1999). The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective,” JFK School of Government, Harvard University working paper
  31. (1997). The Effect of Children’s Sex on Parents’ Gender-Role Attitudes: An Extension Using Japanese Data,”
  32. (1994). The Effect of Sibling Sex Composition on Women’s Education and Earnings,” doi
  33. (2002). Why Have Women Become More Left-Wing? The Political Gender Gap and the Decline in doi
  34. (2004). Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.