Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Power, discursive space and institutional practices in the construction of housing problems

By Keith Jacobs, Jim Kemeny and Tony Manzi


A constructionist approach to the study of social problems and housing policy provides a theoretically informed means of analysing the ways in which housing policy is formulated and implemented. Yet despite a strong commitment by housing researchers to policy-relevance, constructionist studies of how specific social problems are generated and deployed have so far made only a limited impact on housing research. The paper addresses this lacuna by first discussing important literature and the key conceptual issues in this field of study. This is followed by a discussion of two examples from recent UK housing policy (the shift in the 1980s from defining lone mothers as the victims of housing shortages to a morally questionable group subverting needs based allocation policies and the re-emergence of anti-social behaviour as a problem on housing estates). The paper's conclusion is that the 'construction of problems' provides a rich source of new material as well as offering significant opportunities to develop a more critically informed housing research agenda

Topics: UOW1
OAI identifier:
Provided by: WestminsterResearch

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). A Review of Anti-social Behaviour Orders, Home Office Research Study 236, (London: Home Office).
  2. (1998). Abortion as a social problem: the construction of 'opposite' solutions
  3. (1993). Action Group
  4. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-orientated learning therein,
  5. (1999). Arguing against cuts in lone parent benefits: reclaiming the desert ground in the UK,
  6. (1988). Beyond the Welfare State (London,
  7. (1998). Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal (London, The Stationary Office).
  8. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas,
  9. (1996). Community without Politics: a Market Approach to Welfare Reform (London, Institute of Economic Affairs).
  10. (1998). Connecting linguistic structures and social practices: a discursive approach to social policy analysis,
  11. (1977). Constructing Social Problems (Menlo Park (Calif), Cummings Publication Co).
  12. (1988). Constructing the Political Spectacle (Chicago,
  13. (1992). Dependency Culture: the Explosion of a Myth (Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf).
  14. (1996). Discourse and policy change: the significance of language for housing research,
  15. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalisation of practice: the case of acid rain
  16. (2000). Engineers of the human machine: the social practice of council housing management in
  17. (2001). Exporting workfare/importing welfare-to-work: exploring the politics of third way policy transfer,
  18. (1999). for Neighbourhood Renewal
  19. (1977). for One-Parent Families
  20. (1998). From equality to social inclusion: New Labour and the welfare state,
  21. (2000). Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy, Environment and Planning A
  22. (1999). Home Ownership in Crisis? The Experience of Negative Equity in
  23. (1997). Homelessness: The (In-)Appropriate Applicant
  24. (1994). Interpreting breadline Britain, in: U. Meinhof and K. Richardson (eds) Text, Discourse and Context: Representations of Poverty in
  25. (1984). Kikokushijo: the emergence and institutionalization of an education problem in Japan, in:
  26. (1997). Linking housing changes to crime’
  27. (1999). Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities
  28. (1984). Losing Ground: American Social Policy,
  29. (1989). Losing Out: the Emergence of Britain’s Underclass
  30. (2001). Making work pay’ – devising the best strategy for lone parents in Britain,
  31. (1996). Mothers, workers, wives: comparing policy approaches to supporting lone mothers,
  32. (1998). Myths and reality: anti-social behaviour in Scotland,
  33. (1987). Myths and the definition of policy problems,
  34. (2000). Narratives of policy: the construction or urban problems and urban policy in the official discourse of British government, 1968-1998,
  35. (2000). National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal: Report of Policy Action Team 8: Anti-Social Behaviour (London,
  36. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering: the anatomy of social problems explanation,
  37. (1999). Policy Transfer and British Social Policy: Learning from the USA? (Buckingham,
  38. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: a Survey of Households’ Resources and Standard of Living
  39. Privileged or exploited council tenants? The discursive change in Conservative housing policy from 1972-1980’ Policy and Politics.
  40. (1993). Problem definition, agenda access, and policy choice,
  41. (1993). Reinventing Civil Society: the Rediscovery of Welfare without Politics (London, Institute of Economic Affairs).
  42. (1974). Report of the Committee on One-Parent Families
  43. (1994). Restructuring the local welfare state, in
  44. (1998). School of Sociology and Social Work, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 17, Hobart 7001 Tasmania, Australia. Email Jim Kemeny, Institute for Housing and Urban Research,
  45. (1988). Selling the Welfare State: the Privatisation of Public Housing
  46. (2001). Social balance and mixed neighbourhoods in Britain since 1979: a review of discourse and practice in social housing,
  47. (1996). Social constructions of lone motherhood: a case of competing discourses
  48. (2001). Social housing as crime control: an examination of the role of housing management in policing sex offenders,
  49. (1999). Social problem or social threat? Media representation of lone mothers and policy implications,
  50. (1971). Social problems as collective behaviour,
  51. (1997). Social problems as landmark narratives: Bank of Boston, mass media and ‘money laundering’,
  52. (1975). Social Problems as Social Movements (Lippincott,
  53. (1973). Social problems: a reformulation,
  54. (1979). Speaking Truth to Power
  55. (1999). Special issue on discourse and urban change,
  56. (1963). Symbolic crusade: Status Politics and the
  57. (2001). Taking the blame and losing the home: women and anti social behaviour,
  58. (1992). The Corporatist State: Interest Organisations and Public Administration in Swedish Politics
  59. (1996). The death of the social? Reconfiguring the territory of Government,
  60. (1994). The Eclipse of Council Housing
  61. (1990). The Emerging British Underclass (London, Institute for Economic Affairs).
  62. (2002). The governance of anti-social behaviour,
  63. (1994). The governance of homelessness: legality, lore and lexicon in the agency – maintenance of youth homelessness,
  64. (1998). The Growth of Lone Parenthood: Diversity and Dynamics
  65. (1998). The Inclusive Society: Social Exclusion and New Labour
  66. (1994). The New Social Policy
  67. (1995). The problem of lone mother families in twentieth century Britain, Welfare State Programme Discussion Paper 114, (STICERD, London School of Economics).
  68. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People
  69. (1995). The Spirit of Community (London,
  70. (1999). The struggle to define homelessness: a constructivist approach
  71. (1962). The two faces of power,
  72. (1997). The whole spirit of modern philanthropy: the construction of the idea of charity, 1912-1992,
  73. (2002). The World We’re In
  74. (1973). Toward a sociology of social problems: social conditions, value judgements and social problems,
  75. (1994). Underclass: the Crisis Deepens (London,
  76. (1991). Unravelling Housing Finance
  77. (1993). Vernacular constituents of moral discourse: an interactionist proposal for the study of social problems, in:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.