Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

So many managers, so little vision: registered social landlords and consortium schemes in the UK

By Tony Manzi and Bill Smith-Bowers


The broad trajectory of housing policy since the 1980s has been to reject the paternalism and bureaucracy of traditional local authority landlords and to encourage voluntary sector housing providers. The rationale for these strategies has been to use a diversity of landlords (to create synergy and avoid monolithic structures) and to encourage a mix of tenures (to develop sustainable communities and avoid 'ghettoisation'). However, to date the practical management implications of such schemes have not been subject to detailed empirical research. Consequently, this article considers the application of\ud contemporary ideas about housing management in the UK within the context of a consortium development built in the early 1990s. Based upon an in-depth study of one of the first and largest housing association consortium schemes, the article critically considers the central management issues facing the different participants in the scheme. It illustrates how the management of the post 1988 housing association developments has brought considerable difficulties, which have been exacerbated within multi-landlord developments. In such cases the consequence has been to entrench problems of marginalisation and social exclusion. The conclusion identifies the problems that registered social landlords will need to address if they are to improve their management systems

Topics: UOW1
OAI identifier:
Provided by: WestminsterResearch

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). A New Lease of Life? Housing Association Investment on Local Authority Housing Estates.
  2. (1996). An Evaluation of Six Early Estate Action Schemes.
  3. (1981). An Investigation of Difficult to Let Housing: Vol.1: General Findings.
  4. (2002). Approaches to Community Governance: Models for Mixed Tenure Communities.
  5. (2002). Area Effects: What do They Mean for British Housing and Regeneration Policy?’
  6. (2000). Assessing the Impact of Tenure Diversification: The Case of Niddrie. Edinburgh Scottish Homes Research Report 79 Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.
  7. (1997). Bringing Britain Together: a National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal.
  8. (1994). Developing Communities. Sutton: Hastoe Housing Association
  9. (2002). Evidence into Practice: New Deal for Communities National Evaluation. London: Neighbourhood Renewal Unit.
  10. (2003). Home Office web site accessed
  11. (2001). Improving the Understanding of the Influence of Owneroccupiers in Mixed Tenure Neighbourhoods.
  12. (2001). Innovation in a Regulated Service: the Case of English Housing Assocations’.
  13. (1999). Joined up Places? Social Cohesion and Neighbourhood Regeneration.
  14. (1996). Less than Equal? Community Organisations and Estate Regeneration Partnerships.
  15. (1999). Living Together: Community Life on Mixed Tenure Estates.
  16. (1986). Managing the Crisis in Council Housing.
  17. (1998). New Public Management and Housing Associations: from Comfort to Competition’,
  18. (1987). Property Before People: the Management of Twentieth-Century Council Housing London: Allen and Unwin.
  19. (2003). Property Rights, Planning and Markets Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  20. (2003). Rebalancing Communities: Introducing Mixed Incomes into Existing Rented Housing Estates.
  21. (1998). Reconnecting Excluded Communities: The Neighbourhood Impacts of Owner Occupation. Scottish Homes Research Report 61. Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.
  22. (2001). Social Exclusion Unit.
  23. (2001). Social Mix and the Neighbourhood Effect: Policy Ambitions and Empirical Evidence’,
  24. (1999). Spatial and Social Divisions within British Cities: Beyond Residualisation’.
  25. (1995). Swimming Against the Tide: Polarisation or
  26. (2000). The Changing Management of Social Housing: the Impact of Externalisation and Managerialisation’.
  27. (2000). The Changing Role of Housing Associations’
  28. (2002). The Draft London Plan: Draft Spatial Development Strategy for London. London: Greater London Authority.
  29. the Environment, Transport and the Regions. 2000a. Index of Deprivation. London: The Stationery Office.
  30. the Environment, Transport and the Regions. 2000b. Our Towns and Cities – The Future: Delivering an Urban Renaissance. London: The Stationery Office.
  31. the Environment, Transport and the Regions. 2000c. Millennium Villages and Sustainable Communities. Final Report. London: The Stationery Office.
  32. (1993). The Politics of Implementation’
  33. (1981). The Politics of Mass Housing
  34. (1993). The re-privatisation of housing associations’
  35. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference.
  36. (1995). Too Many Cooks? A Review of Policy and Practice on Multi-Landlord Estates. London: National Federation of Housing Associations.
  37. (2000). Top-Down Meets Bottom-Up: Neighbourhood Management.
  38. (2000). Urban Policy and Politics in Britain.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.