Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Interference between postural control and mental task performance in patients with vestibular disorder and healthy controls\ud

By Lucy Yardley, Mark Gardner, Adolfo M. Bronstein, R. Davies, D. Buckwell and Linda Luxon

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether interference between postural control and mental task performance in patients with balance system impairment and healthy subjects is due to general capacity limitations, motor control interference, competition for spatial processing resources, or a combination of these. \ud Method: Postural stability was assessed in 48 patients with vestibular disorder and 24 healthy controls while they were standing with eyes closed on (a) a stable and (b) a moving platform. Mental task performance was measured by accuracy and reaction time on mental tasks, comprising high and low load, spatial and non-spatial tasks. Interference between balancing and performing mental tasks was assessed by comparing baseline (single task) levels of sway and mental task performance with levels while concurrently balancing and carrying out mental tasks.\ud Results: As the balancing task increased in difficulty, reaction times on both low load mental tasks grew progressively longer and accuracy on both high load tasks declined in patients and controls. Postural sway was essentially unaffected by mental activity in patients and controls.\ud Conclusions: It is unlikely that dual task interference between balancing and mental activity is due to competition for spatial processing resources, as levels of interference were similar in patients with vestibular disorder and healthy controls, and were also similar for spatial and nonspatial tasks. Moreover, the finding that accuracy declined on the high load tasks when balancing cannot be attributed to motor control interference, as no motor\ud control processing is involved in maintaining accuracy of responses. Therefore, interference between mental activity and postural control can be attributed principally to general capacity limitations, and is hence proportional to the attentional demands of both tasks.\u

Topics: UOW10
OAI identifier: oai:westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk:162
Provided by: WestminsterResearch

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). A dual task study of interference between mental activity and control of balance.
  2. (1996). A general factor involved in dual task performance decrement.
  3. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychol Rev
  4. (1996). Age diVerences in postural stability are increased by additional cognitive demands.
  5. Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp Brain Res 1993;97:
  6. (2006). Bronstein, et al www.jnnp.com on 9
  7. Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: evidence from acquired dyscalculia.
  8. (1985). Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform
  9. Computerized dynamic posturography.
  10. Dissociations and dependancies between speed and accuracy: evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognit Psychol 1989;21:
  11. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.
  12. EVect of articulatory and mental tasks on postural control.
  13. (1994). Interference in immediate spatial memory. Mem Cognit
  14. (1998). Neuro-otological and psychiatric abnormalities in a community sample of people with dizziness: a blind, controlled investigation.
  15. (1993). On the cognitive penetrability of posture control. Exp Aging Res
  16. Psychiatry assistance with testing patients and controls.
  17. (1999). Spatial performance of unilateral vestibular defective patients in non-visual versus visual navigation.
  18. (1997). Stops walking when talking” as a predictor of falls in elderly people.
  19. (1997). Talking while walking: the eVect of a dual task in aging and Alzheimer’s disease.
  20. The eVects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls.
  21. (1990). The influence of aging and attentional demands on recovery from postural instability. Aging
  22. The influence of attention on postural control during stance.
  23. (1992). Visual destabilisation of posture.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.