Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

That's Just - Not Fair: Gender Differences in Notions of Justice

By Nicole Becker, Kirsten H\ue4ger and Jan Heufer


In Becker et al. (2013a,b), we proposed a theory to explain giving behaviour in dictator experiments by a combination of selfishness and a notion of justice. The theory was tested using dictator, social planner, and veil of ignorance experiments. Here we analyse gender differences in preferences for giving and notions of justice in experiments using the same data. Similar to Andreoni and Vesterlund (2001), we find some differences in giving behaviour. We find even stronger differences in the notion of justice between men and women; women tend to be far more egalitarian. Using our preference decomposition approach from Becker et al. (2013a) and parametric estimates, we show that differences in the giving behaviour between men and women in dictator experiments are explained by differences in their notion of justice and not by different levels of selfishness. We employ both parametric and non-parametric techniques, and both methods confirm the result

Topics: C91, D12, D61, D63, D64, J16, ddc:330, Altruism, Dictator Games, Distribution, Experimental Economics, Gender Differences, Justice, Social Preferences
Publisher: Amsterdam and Rotterdam: Tinbergen Institute
Year: 2015
OAI identifier:
Provided by: EconStor

Suggested articles

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.