Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

From Doha to El Dorado? : the WTO, agricultural liberalisation and the false promise of free markets\ud

By Ben Richardson


The trade talks at the Doha Round of the World Trade Organisation have stuttered along since 2001 with seemingly little prospect for conclusion. Nevertheless, the conviction\ud remains that the round should be finished lest significant economic gains be passed over and the long run trading interests of developing countries damaged. In this reading, it is insufficient political will among world leaders that has prevented poor countries from moving towards a fair and free trading environment. By bringing to light the manifest uncertainties that hang over such attempts to instil free market principles on the agricultural economy however, this paper sounds three sceptical notes on the idea that progressive liberalisation through the WTO can deliver a development boon. First, choosing the right path to\ud liberalisation is confounded by the fact that negotiators are unsure of the value of certain concessions and so may deviate down a ‘sub-optimal’ route. Second, the belief that the ‘uneven playing field’ will be ultimately levelled as trade-distorting policies are gradually eroded ignores the persistent renewal of government involvement in agriculture as policy instruments evolve over time. Third, to the extent that liberalisation does occur, its benefits\ud are assumed rather than given. By looking at Brazil, a country expected to be one of the prime beneficiaries of a successful roll-back in agricultural protectionism, it is shown how trade expansion has led to an unequal form of development that has stymied economic opportunities for the poor. Because of these three factors, it is concluded that development through liberalisation remains more an act of ideological faith than a question of willpower.\ud As such, the purpose of the multilateral trading system must be reappraised

Topics: HF
Publisher: University of Warwick
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2007). Africa and the WTO Doha Round: An Overview’, Development Policy Review,Vol. doi
  2. (2005). Agricultural Liberalization in the Doha Round’, doi
  3. (2008). Agricultural Market Access: A Moving Target in doi
  4. (2003). Behind the Scenes at the WTO: The Real World doi
  5. (2008). Biofuels Brazil,
  6. (2007). Biofuels Country Attractiveness Indices’, Renewable Energy Group,
  7. (2007). Brazil Peasants Storm Farms,
  8. (1998). Brazil: One Hundred Years of the Agrarian Question’, doi
  9. (2002). Brazil’s Domination of the World Sugar Market’,
  10. (2004). Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones: Where the WTO is going after Seattle, Doha and Cancún’, doi
  11. (2002). Cutting the Wire: The Story of the Landless Movement in Brazil (London: doi
  12. (2002). Developing Countries at Doha: A Political Economy Analysis’, The World Economy, doi
  13. (2008). Direitos Humanos e a Indústria da Cana’ (São Paulo: Rede Social,
  14. (2007). Doha Clock is Ticking’, Speech given at the International Trademark Association Committee,
  15. (2006). Economic Size Trumps All Else? Lessons from BRICSAM’, Centre for International Governance Innovation Working Paper, doi
  16. (2009). Exclusive Engine of Growth: The Development Model of Brazilian Sugarcane’, Ethical Sugar Discussion Paper,
  17. (2006). for Trade and Sustainable Development doi
  18. (2005). Global Governance, National Strategies: How Industrialized States Make Room to Move under the WTO’, doi
  19. (2006). Globalization and the Transformation of Work in Rural Brazil: Agribusiness, Rural Labour Unions, and Peasant doi
  20. (2007). Green Box Subsidies: A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment (New Delhi:
  21. (2003). International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions doi
  22. (2004). Making Doha a Better Deal for Poor Countries’,
  23. (2007). Multilateral Agricultural Liberalisation: The Contrasting Fortunes of Developing Countries in the Doha Round’, The World Economy, doi
  24. (2008). Omens and Threats in the Doha Round: The Decline of Multilateralism?’, doi
  25. (2003). Producing Community: The MST and the Land Reform Settlements in Brazil’, doi
  26. (2008). Programme Officer for Agriculture at International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, interviewed in Geneva,
  27. (2003). Questioning Market-Led Agrarian Reform’, doi
  28. (2007). Rivals Fuelled by One Dream’,
  29. (2005). Show of Unity and
  30. (2004). Special and Differential Treatment in Agricultural Negotiations’,
  31. (2004). The G-20 and the World Economy’, Speech given at
  32. (2004). The G20 and the Cancún Ministerial: Developing Countries and their doi
  33. (2007). The Global Food Economy: The Battle for the Future of Farming (London: doi
  34. (2010). The Politics of Agrofuel in Brazil: Paradigms and Territorial Dispute’, doi
  35. (2005). The Relative Importance of Global Agricultural Subsidies and Market Access’, Paper from the World Bank Project on Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, doi
  36. (2008). The Shrinking Gains from Global Trade Liberalization in Computable General Equilibrium Models’, doi
  37. (2007). The Success of EU Sugar Regime Reform is Being Undermined by its External Trade Policy’,
  38. (2006). The WTO After Hong Kong: Where Do We Go from Here?’, Speech at Friedrich Naumann Foundation,
  39. (2006). The WTO and the Doha Round: The Way Forward’, Speech given to Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations,
  40. (2002). The WTO, the Post-Doha Agenda and the Future Trade System: A Development Perspective’, Paper prepared for the Asian Development Bank,
  41. (2006). The WTO: Crisis and the Governance of Global Trade doi
  42. (2008). Trade Agreement Needed Now’,
  43. (2004). Transnational Mercantilism and the Emergent Global Trading Order’, doi
  44. (2007). Troubled Talks Threaten WTO’s Credibility’,
  45. (2006). United States Trade Representative, ‘Op-Ed: Still Ready to Talk’, Wall Street
  46. (2008). World Trade Organisation, ‘Revised Draft Modalities’,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.