Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Process evaluation of appreciative inquiry to translate pain management evidence into pediatric nursing practice

By Tricia Kavanagh, Bonnie J. Stevens, Kate Seers, Souraya Sidani and Judith H. Watt-Watson


Background\ud Appreciative inquiry (AI) is an innovative knowledge translation (KT) intervention that is compatible with the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARiHS) framework. This study explored the innovative use of AI as a theoretically based KT intervention applied to a clinical issue in an inpatient pediatric care setting. The implementation of AI was explored in terms of its acceptability, fidelity, and feasibility as a KT intervention in pain management.\ud \ud Methods\ud A mixed-methods case study design was used. The case was a surgical unit in a pediatric academic-affiliated hospital. The sample consisted of nurses in leadership positions and staff nurses interested in the study. Data on the AI intervention implementation were collected by digitally recording the AI sessions, maintaining logs, and conducting individual semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using qualitative and quantitative content analyses and descriptive statistics. Findings were triangulated in the discussion.\ud \ud Results\ud Three nurse leaders and nine staff members participated in the study. Participants were generally satisfied with the intervention, which consisted of four 3-hour, interactive AI sessions delivered over two weeks to promote change based on positive examples of pain management in the unit and staff implementation of an action plan. The AI sessions were delivered with high fidelity and 11 of 12 participants attended all four sessions, where they developed an action plan to enhance evidence-based pain assessment documentation. Participants labeled AI a 'refreshing approach to change' because it was positive, democratic, and built on existing practices. Several barriers affected their implementation of the action plan, including a context of change overload, logistics, busyness, and a lack of organised follow-up. \ud \ud Conclusions\ud Results of this case study supported the acceptability, fidelity, and feasibility of AI as a KT intervention in pain management. The AI intervention requires minor refinements (e.g., incorporating continued follow-up meetings) to enhance its clinical utility and sustainability. The implementation process and effectiveness of the modified AI intervention require evaluation in a larger multisite study. \ud \u

Topics: R1
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1998). A field experiment in Appreciative Inquiry. Organization Development Journal
  2. A nursing and allied health sciences perspective on knowledge utilization. In Using Knowledge and Evidence in Health Care: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Edited by Lemieux-Charles L, Champagne F. Toronto:
  3. (2004). AE: A qualitative study to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of pilot interventions in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Northwest Network. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs doi
  4. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher doi
  5. (2009). An Appreciative Inquiry approach to RN retention. Nurs Manage doi
  6. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry Handbook: The First in a Series of AI Workbooks for Leaders of Change.
  7. (2006). Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi
  8. (2007). B: An examination of the factors enabling the successful implementation of evidence-based acute pain practices into pediatric nursing. Child Health Care doi
  9. (2004). C: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess doi
  10. (2005). Changing the behavior of health care professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. doi
  11. (1995). Coetzer G: Appreciative Inquiry as a team-development intervention: a controlled experiment. doi
  12. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J doi
  13. (2002). Educating nurses about pain management: the way forward. doi
  14. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidence-based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care doi
  15. (2008). Estabrooks CA: Sources of information used by nurses to inform practice: an integrative review.
  16. (2008). Estabrooks CA: The relationship between busyness and research utilization: it is about time. doi
  17. (2004). Evaluation of the pain resource nurse role: a resource for improving pediatric pain management. Pain Manag Nurs doi
  18. (2008). Examining Appreciative Inquiry as a knowledge translation intervention in pain management. doi
  19. (2009). Factors effecting delivery of evidencebased procedural pain care in hospitalized neonates. doi
  20. (2007). Factors influencing bestpractice guideline implementation: lessons learned from administrators, nursing staff, and project leaders. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs doi
  21. for Innovation and Improvement Sustainability Model: Adaptability []
  22. (2005). From workshop to work practice: an exploration of context and facilitation in the development of evidence-based practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs doi
  23. (2002). Going home from hospital: an appreciative inquiry study. Health Soc Care Community doi
  24. (2005). Golden-Biddle K: Understanding how organizational culture shapes research use. doi
  25. (1997). Grypkonck M: Effects of a continuing education program on nurses’ pain assessment practices. J Pain Symptom Manage doi
  26. (2005). Hulle Vincent C: Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding children’s pain. doi
  27. (2006). Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG): Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implement Sci
  28. (2007). K: An Appreciative Inquiry approach to practice improvement and transformative change in health care settings. Qual Manag Health Care doi
  29. (2005). Kassam AF: When is Appreciative Inquiry transformational? A meta-case analysis. doi
  30. (2007). L: Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review. Implement Sci doi
  31. O’Connor W: Carrying out qualitative analysis. In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Edited by
  32. (2007). Pesut DJ: Appreciative inquiry for leading in complex systems: supporting the transformation of academic nursing culture. J Nurs Educ
  33. (2003). Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Qual Saf Health Care doi
  34. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications;
  35. Strauss A: Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: doi
  36. (2004). Testing a collaborative research utilization model to translate best practices in pain management. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs doi
  37. The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. doi
  38. (2009). The importance of piloting an RCT intervention.
  39. (2004). The PARIHS framework: a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. doi
  40. (2005). Thomas SP: Problematic interviewee behaviors in qualitative research. doi
  41. (2004). Titchen A: An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice. doi
  42. (2008). Titchen A: Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci doi
  43. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health doi
  44. (2006). Willey-Temkin C: Translating best practices in non-drug postoperative pain management. Nurs Res doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.