Location of Repository

Risk stratification in assessing risk in coronary artery bypass surgery\ud

By Mike Rees and Jitesh Dineschandra

Abstract

We present the need for risk stratification in the monitoring of cardiac surgical practice and review the frequentist and Bayesian approaches to the problem. Developments in the available databases are described. Enhancements to the Parsonnet and EuroSCORE systems are reviewed. We argue that in the UK, although the use of the Parsonnet system is inappropriate and that the EuroSCORE system is a clear improvement, there are advantages in adopting a system based on a Bayesian model for risk assessment

Topics: UOW3
Publisher: IEEE
OAI identifier: oai:westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk:2809
Provided by: WestminsterResearch

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. A comparison of Bayesian vs. a frequentist method for profiling hospital performance,”
  2. (2006). A method for uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of
  3. An axiomatic characterization of Bayes'
  4. (2003). An evaluation of existing risk stratification models as a tool for comparison of surgical performances for coronary artery bypass grafting between institutions,”
  5. (1998). and the EuroSCORE Study Group European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE), presented to the 12th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery,
  6. Bedside estimation of risks as an aid for decision-making in cardiac surgery,”
  7. (2004). Cardiac surgery risk models: a position article,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery,
  8. (2003). Creatine clearance versus serum creatine as a risk factor in cardiac surgery,”
  9. (2000). Evidence-based medicine as Bayesian decision-making,” Statistics in Medicine,
  10. (1997). Is the Parsonnet's score a good predictive score of mortality in adult cardiac surgery: assessment by a French multicentre study,”
  11. (2000). Limitations of the Parsonnet score for measuring risk stratified mortality in the north west of England,”
  12. (1990). Making better decisions: construction of clinical scoring systems by the Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones approach,”
  13. (1999). Mortality prediction in cardiac surgery patients: comparative performance of Parsonnet and general severity systems,” Circulation,
  14. (1999). National Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report
  15. (2003). National Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report 2003: improving outcomes for patients, Dendrite Clinical Systems,
  16. (1998). Predicting operative risk for coronary artery surgery in the United Kingdom: a comparison of various risk prediction algorithms,”
  17. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients,”
  18. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve,” Radiology,
  19. (1984). The UK cardiac surgical register 1977-82,”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.