Location of Repository

The EU's promotion of human rights in China : a consistent and coordinated constructive engagement?

By Giuseppe Balducci

Abstract

This thesis investigates whether the European Union and its member states have\ud been able to balance normative priorities – specifically the promotion of human\ud rights – and material priorities – specifically economic interests – within the\ud strategy of constructive engagement towards China embraced since 1995. In\ud order to respond to this central question this thesis originally elaborates a liberal\ud intergovernmental approach for the study of the promotion of human rights\ud within the EU’s system of multilevel governance in external relations. Such an\ud approach is applied to analyse the issues of consistency and coordination in the\ud policies for the promotion of human rights in China elaborated by the European\ud Community and three selected member states, namely Germany, France and the\ud UK.\ud The choice of the country cases serves theoretical and analytical purposes. At a\ud theoretical level it allows consideration as to whether the EU’s overall policies\ud were mainly influenced by the interests and policy preferences of the three\ud selected member states, which had the most bargaining power and the highest\ud stakes in China, as expected by liberal intergovernmentalism. At an analytical\ud level, the choice of the country cases allows for consideration of whether the\ud EC’s policies for the promotion of human rights in China were coordinated with\ud those of the three selected member states, which had the most conspicuous\ud development assistance policies towards China and whose approaches to human\ud rights in the country were broadly representative of the other member states.\ud This supports the assessment of the achievement, or otherwise, of a significant\ud EU promotion of human rights through development assistance in China.\ud From the study it emerges that the EC and its three selected member states have\ud been unable to devise consistent and coordinated policies for the promotion of\ud human rights in China. On the one hand these findings suggest that the EU and\ud its member states have been unable to balance normative and material priorities\ud in their relations with China. On the other hand this thesis illustrates that this\ud was due to the influence of the material interests and policy preferences of\ud Germany, France and the UK, thus supporting the expectations of liberal\ud intergovernmentalism.\ud These findings form an original contribution to the study of the EU’s promotion\ud of norms because they suggest that the EU can promote human rights, as well as\ud other norms, in a consistent, coordinated and ultimately strategic way, only if\ud the member states with the most bargaining power and the highest stakes in a\ud specific policy issue privilege normative interests over material ones.\ud At the same time this thesis offers an original contribution to EU-China studies\ud on human rights, as it suggests that due to the present interests of the most\ud influential member states, the EU’s promotion of human rights should be\ud reframed to address what Chinese authorities are willing to accommodate in the\ud human rights field, namely give preference to the support of socio-economic\ud rights, where a consensus among the EU’s member states can more easily be\ud built

Topics: JC, JN
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:3895

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1995). A Long Term Policy for China-Europe Relations,
  2. (2003). A maturing partnership – shared interests and challenges in EU-China relations, COM
  3. (1999). An Ever Closer Union in Need of a Human Rights Policy: the European Union and Human Rights’, doi
  4. (1996). and China: A continental temptation’, doi
  5. (2007). and the EU: A Strategic Axis for the Twenty-First Century?’, doi
  6. and Thomas Christiansen (eds.) (2004), Rethinking European Union foreign policy, doi
  7. (2005). Arms Ban: Putting Europe’s Position to Congress’, Foreign Policy Centre. 212 Balme, Richard (2008) ‘The European Union, China and Human Rights’,
  8. (2001). Behind China’s World Trade Organization agreement with the USA’, Third World Quarterly, doi
  9. (2003). Behind Closed Doors: Bilateral Dialogues on Human Rights, China Rights Forum,
  10. (1993). Between Freedom and Subsistence, doi
  11. (2005). Beyond official diplomacy: the role of political foundations in German-Chinese relations. The Case of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation’,
  12. (2004). Bilateral Aid to Improve Human Rights. Donors need to adopt a more coherent and thoughtful strategy’, China Perspectives,
  13. (1998). Building a Comprehensive Partnership with China, Commission Communication COM
  14. (2004). China and Europe: the Emerging Axis’, Current History,
  15. (1994). China and Europe: the Significance of a Secondary Relationship’,
  16. (1999). China and the international human rights regime’
  17. (2008). China-EU: A Common Future, Singapore, World Scientific. doi
  18. (2002). China, the European Union and the United States of America: Partners or Competitors?’, Duisburg Working Papers on East Asian Studies,
  19. (1999). China, the United Nations and Human Rights: the Limits of Compliance, doi
  20. (1997). China’s Entry into the WTO with a Little Help from the EU’, doi
  21. (2004). China’s Growth Treadmill: Globalization, Human Rights and International Relations’, doi
  22. (2002). China’s Long March Towards the Rule of Law, Cambridge, doi
  23. (1997). Chinese Diplomacy, Western Hypocrisy and the UN Human Rights Commission.
  24. (1998). Closing the Capability-Expectations Gap’,
  25. (2005). Coherence and Consistency’,
  26. (2006). Council of the European Union doi
  27. (2001). Council of the European Union (2001), EU Council Human Rights Dialogue Benchmarks for the EU-China Dialogue,
  28. (2003). Council of the European Union (2003), A Secure Europe in a Better World, European Security Strategy, doi
  29. (2004). Council of the European Union (2004), Council Conclusions on EU-China Human Rights Dialogue,
  30. (2007). Council of the European Union (2007), ‘Ninth annual report according to operative provision 8 of the
  31. (2006). Country Strategy Paper 2007-2013, Commission Strategy Paper. doi
  32. (2002). Debating Human Rights in China: A Conceptual and Political History, doi
  33. (1998). Declaration on a Comprehensive Partnership Agreement,
  34. (2004). Declaration on a Strategic Partnership Agreement,
  35. (1997). Declaration on the establishment of a comprehensive partnership, Beijing Review,
  36. (2002). Declaration on the establishment of a strategic partnership, New China News Agency,
  37. (2006). Development cooperation between Germany and China: does China still need development aid?’, doi
  38. (1990). Distant Neighbours: China and Europe London, doi
  39. Eberhard Sandschneider and Zhou Hong (eds.) (2006), China-Europe Relations. Perceptions, Policies and Prospects,
  40. (2001). Economic relations between Germany and Mainland China 1979-2000’, Duisburg Working Papers on East Asian Economic Studies ,
  41. (2005). Embracing the Dragon. The EU’s Partnership with China, Centre for European Reform.
  42. (2007). Engaging China – Uniting Europe? EU foreign policy towards China’, doi
  43. (2008). EU human rights and democracy promotion in Central Asia: From Lofty principles to Lowly self-interests’, doi
  44. (2006). EU Human Rights Policies: A Study in Irony,
  45. (2007). EU-China relations: balancing political challenges with economic opportunities’, doi
  46. (2006). EU-China: Closer partners, growing responsibilities, COM(2006) 631 final.
  47. (2001). Europa, forza gentile, doi
  48. (2006). Europe a Civilian Power? EU, Global Governance, World Order, doi
  49. (2006). Europe’s commercial relations with China’, in David Shambaugh et al., China-Europe Relations. Perceptions, Policies and Prospects, doi
  50. (1972). Europe’s Role in World Peace’,
  51. (2001). European and American Approaches Toward China as an Emerging Power’, China Aktuell,
  52. (2003). European Approaches to Democracy Assistance: Learning the Right Lessons?’, doi
  53. (2000). European Union Development Cooperation and the Promotion of Democracy’, doi
  54. (2003). European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World, doi
  55. (2002). European Union. What it is and what it does,
  56. (2007). Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation and Partnership with the People’s Republic of China, Country Level Evaluation, 2nd Draft Final Synthesis Report.
  57. (2005). Germany’s China Policy: Trade Promotion, Human Rights and European Disunity’,
  58. (2003). Haiyan Zhang and Maria Do Céuesteves doi
  59. (2005). Hard Measures by a Soft Power? Sanctions Policy of the European Union 1981-2004’,
  60. (2003). Human Rights in China doi
  61. Human Rights in China (2000), Human Rights Situation in China and the Dialogue on Human Rights, Submission to the British House of Commons, doi
  62. (1994). Human Rights in Chinese Foreign Policy’, doi
  63. (2001). Human Rights in Chinese Foreign Relations, doi
  64. (1999). Human Rights in European Foreign Policy: Success or Failure for Post-modern Diplomacy?’, doi
  65. (1999). Human Rights in the World Report doi
  66. (2001). Human Rights Watch doi
  67. (2002). Human Rights, Europe and the People’s Republic of China’, doi
  68. (2006). Human Rights, Transnational Actors and the Chinese Government: Another Look at the Spiral Model’, doi
  69. (2002). Inklings of Democracy in China, doi
  70. (2005). International Relations and the European Union, doi
  71. (2006). Introduction, doi
  72. (2008). Introduction: Ethical Power Europe’, doi
  73. (2007). Introduction: The System of European Foreign Policy’, doi
  74. (1999). Is there a European Approach to Human Rights?’,
  75. (2006). It is the system that matters. Institutionalization and making of EU policy toward China’,
  76. (2002). La politique chinoise de l’Union européenne: en progrès, mais peut mieux faire’ Paris, Centre Asie IFRI.
  77. (2001). La politique chinoise de la France: Du mythe de la relation privilégiée au syndrome de la normalisation’, doi
  78. (2003). Letter Regarding the EU-China Human Rights Dialogue, doi
  79. (2007). Market Imperative Meets Normative Power: Human Rights and doi
  80. (1991). Negotiating the Single European Act’, doi
  81. (2004). Normative Dynamics and Strategic Interests in the EU’s External Identity’, doi
  82. (2002). Normative Power Europe: a Contradiction in terms?’, doi
  83. (2006). Normative Power Europe? Economic Partnership Agreements and Africa’, doi
  84. (2004). One Size Fits All! EU Policies for the Promotion of Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law’, paper presented at the Workshop on Democracy Promotion,
  85. Open Society and Human Rights in China (2001), Promoting Human Rights doi
  86. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: a Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’, doi
  87. (2006). Promoting human rights and democracy
  88. (2006). Relations between France and China: Towards a Paris-Beijing Axis?’, China: an international journal, doi
  89. (2000). Rights beyond Borders, doi
  90. (2001). since Tiananmen: the Politics of Transition, Cambridge, doi
  91. (1999). Social Construction of International Human Rights’, doi
  92. (2000). Stiftungen and Democracy Assistance: Comparative Advantages, New Challenges’,
  93. (2009). Sustainability Chinese Style. The Concept of the “Harmonious Society”’,
  94. (1999). Technology Transfer: A Mode of Collaboration Between the European Union and China’, doi
  95. (2001). The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’, doi
  96. (2006). The Constitutive nature of values, images and principles in the European Union’
  97. (2006). The constraints on EU action as a ‘norm exporter’ in the Mediterranean’,
  98. (2004). The EU’s Approach to Human Rights Conditionality in Practice, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. doi
  99. (2005). The European Union and Democracy Promotion in Africa: the case of Ghana’, doi
  100. (1999). The European Union as a Global Actor, doi
  101. (2001). The European Union’s role in promoting human rights and democratization in third countries,
  102. (2005). The Europeanization of Foreign Policy’, doi
  103. (2006). The Evolution of the EU-China Relationship: from Constructive Engagement to Strategic Partnership’, Institute for Security Studies,
  104. (1994). the Federal Republic of Germany doi
  105. (2000). The Foreign Policies of European Union Members States, doi
  106. (2005). The German-Chinese “Rule of Law” Dialogue: Substantial Interaction or Political Delusion’,
  107. (2006). The Sino-European encounter’, in David Shambaugh, Eberhard Sandschneider and Zhou Hong, China-Europe Relations. Perceptions, Policies and Prospects,
  108. (2003). Toward a Consultative Rule of Law Regime in China’, doi
  109. (2004). Toward a theory of EU foreign policy making: multilevel governance, domestic politics, and national adaptation to Europe’s common foreign and security policy’, doi
  110. (2003). Trade Sanctions and Human Rights. Past, Present and Future’, doi
  111. (2007). Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community: Lisbon Treaty’, doi
  112. (2000). UK Policy towards China’,
  113. (2001). Understanding European Foreign Policy, Palgrave, doi
  114. (2004). Understanding the European Union’s External Relations, doi
  115. (2006). Values, principles, identity and European Union foreign policy’, doi
  116. (2008). What does China think?, London, Fourth Estate. 220 Liu Fei and David Kerr

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.