Location of Repository

Screening for breast cancer : medicalization, visualization and the embodied experience\ud

By Frances Griffiths, Gillian Bendelow, Eileen Green and Julie Palmer

Abstract

Women’s perspectives on breast screening (mammography and breast awareness) were explored in interviews with midlife women sampled for diversity of background and health experience. Attending mammography screening was considered a social obligation despite women’s fears and experiences of discomfort. Women gave considerable legitimacy to mammography visualizations of the breast, and the expert interpretation of these. In comparison, women lacked confidence in breast awareness practices, directly comparing their sensory capabilities with those of the mammogram, although mammography screening did not substitute breast awareness in a straightforward way. The authors argue that reliance on visualizing technology may create a fragmented sense of the body, separating the at risk breast from embodied experience. \ud \u

Topics: RC0254
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:3946

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2004b) Screening for Breast Cancer: Candidacy and Compliance. doi
  2. (2003). A normal biological process? Brittle bones, HRT and the patient-doctor encounter. IN
  3. (2000). A Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care: The Case of Breast Cancer Screening Among Older Women. doi
  4. (2006). Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer Screening doi
  5. (2004). An Epidemiology of Women's Lives: The Environmental Risk of Breast Cancer. doi
  6. (2006). Are My Bones Normal Doctor?' The Role of Technology in Understanding and Communicating Health Risks for Midlife Women. doi
  7. (2004). Breast Cancer and Breast Screening CancerStats Report.
  8. (2007). Breast Cancer Genes and the Gendering of Knowledge: doi
  9. (2003). Breast Self Examination. doi
  10. (2005). Breast Self-Examination and Breast Awareness: A Literature Review. doi
  11. (2003). Changing women: an analysis of difference and diversity in women's accounts of their experiences of menopause.
  12. (2002). Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening. doi
  13. (2006). Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography. doi
  14. (1993). Disabling BarriersEnabling Environments, doi
  15. (1998). Disintegrating bodies: an analysis of women's experiences of the menopausal body. Making Sense of the Body: Theory Research and Practice. British Sociological Association.
  16. (2000). From "reducing" to "coping with" uncertainty: reconceptualizing the central challenge in breast self-exams. doi
  17. (2006). Health professionals, their medical interventions and uncertainty: a study focusing on women at midlife. doi
  18. (1998). How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets. doi
  19. (2003). i The larger research project involved an additional 35 interviews with women aged 45-64 years, interviews with 58 health professionals and 109 recordings of health care consultations (Griffiths et al.,
  20. (2002). IARC handbooks of cancer prevention. Vol 7: breast cancer screening, doi
  21. (2001). In/different Screening: Contesting Medical Knowledge in an Antenatal Setting.
  22. (2006). Increasing Our Understanding of Breast Self-Examination: Women Talk About Cancer, the Health Care System, and Being Women. doi
  23. (2003). Innovative Health Technologies at Women's Midlife; Theory and Diversity among women and Experts
  24. (2008). Interventions for Relieving Pain and Discomfort of Screening Mammography. Cochrane Databse of Systematic Reviews, doi
  25. (2000). It's just part of being a woman": Cervical Screening, the Body and Femininity. doi
  26. (1996). Lay theorizing about "the body" and implications for health promotion. doi
  27. (2006). Making the Invisible Body Visible: Bone Scans, Osteoporosis and Women's Bodily Experiences. doi
  28. (1975). Medical Nemesis, London, Calder and Boyars. doi
  29. (1977). Medicine as an Institution of Social Control. doi
  30. (2007). Messengers of Sex: Hormones, Biomedicine and Feminism, Cambridge, doi
  31. (2002). Narratives of Risk: women at midlife, medical 'experts' and health technologies. doi
  32. (2004). New Medical Technologies and Society: reordering life, doi
  33. (2001). Print media coverage of environmental causation of breast cancer. doi
  34. (1997). Public Privates: Performing Gynecology from Both Ends of the Speculum, doi
  35. (2004). Qualitative Methods for Health Research,
  36. (2003). Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. doi
  37. (2006). Screening for Breast Cancer with Mammography. Cochrane Databse of Systematic Reviews, doi
  38. (2006). Screening for breast cancer. doi
  39. (2006). Screening Programmes
  40. (1994). Separate, but Less Unequal: Fetal Ultrasonography and the Transformation of Expectant Mother/Fatherhood. doi
  41. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature., doi
  42. (2008). Social Data Service (n.d.) ESDS Qualidata website [Online] Available from: http://www.esds.ac.uk/qualidata/ (accessed 01
  43. (2000). Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century, doi
  44. (2002). Successful Aging' with Hormone Replacement Therapy: It May Be Sexist, But What If It Works? Science as doi
  45. (1996). The 'limits' of medicalisation?: modern medicine and the lay populace in 'late' modernity. doi
  46. (2009). The European Breast Cancer Coalition Guide to Breast Health, Milan, The European Breast Cancer Coalition. doi
  47. (1995). the Imperative of Health: Public Health and the Regulated Body, doi
  48. (1996). The importance of lay theorising for health research and practice. doi
  49. (2005). The Medical Community's Changing Vision of the Patient: The Importance of Radiology. doi
  50. (2006). The Men's Health Movement: A Morbid Symptom. doi
  51. (2005). The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study. doi
  52. (2000). This Most Dangerous Instrument': Propriety, Power, and the Vaginal Speculum. doi
  53. (2003). Understanding Lesbian's Healthcare Behaviour: The Case of Breast Self-Examination. doi
  54. (2001). Watching You - Watching Me": Visualising Techniques and the Cervix. doi
  55. (1983). Women and Medicalization: A New Perspective.
  56. (2003). Women need better information about routine mammography. doi
  57. (1999). Women's control and choice regarding HRT. doi
  58. (1995). Women's Health Concerns: Is the promotion of hormone replacement therapy for prevention important to women? Family Practice, doi
  59. (2006). Women's knowledge about breast cancer risk and their views of the purpose and implications of breast screening - a questionnaire survey. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.