Location of Repository

Improperly obtained evidence in the\ud Commonwealth: lessons for England and Wales?

By Andrew L.-T. Choo and Susan Nash

Abstract

English law's traditional approach to the admissibility of improperly obtained evidence is currently being rethought in response to a range of domestic and international pressures. With the position in England and Wales following the House of Lords' decision in A and Others (2005) firmly in mind, this article undertakes a selective review of comparative approaches to the admissibility of improperly obtained evidence in Australia, Canada and New Zealand.\ud Having analysed relevant legislation and case law in each jurisdiction, general principles are derived to guide future developments in English law, in conformity with the European Convention on Human Rights

Topics: UOW8
OAI identifier: oai:westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk:3809
Provided by: WestminsterResearch

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, s. 35(5). See generally
  2. The International Criminal Court and Discretionary Evidential Exclusion: Toeing the Mark?’ (2005) 14 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 127. Provisions virtually identical to this appear
  3. (2002). The Law of Evidence, 2nd edn (Sweet & Maxwell: London,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.