Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Type 1 diabetes in adolescence : a shared responsibility

By Heidi Gibbins


Type I diabetes effects over 16,500 children in the UK. For these young\ud people, care is needed to maintain 'near normal' blood glucose levels in order\ud to relieve the unpleasant symptoms of high and low blood glucose. Although\ud good metabolic control may decrease the risk of severe long term\ud complications, adolescents often have difficulty juggling all the aspects of a\ud complex and demanding treatment regimen, and poor adherence is\ud commonplace.\ud The literature review proposes a theoretical framework for understanding the\ud role of responsibility in the management of type 1 diabetes during adolescence.\ud The pattern of responsibility is explored in relation to the individual and their\ud interpersonal context. In terms of health outcome, the effects of individual and\ud shared responsibility are considered, necessitating a balance between the\ud adolescent's assumption of responsibility and their level of parental\ud involvement. Suggestions for clinical practice are discussed, methodological\ud limitations raised, and future research opportunities identified.\ud The role of dietary self efficacy in predicting self care during adolescence is\ud established. Using data for two distinct phases of adolescence, paper 1\ud examines whether social support from family and friends makes any additional\ud contribution to the prediction of dietary self care, over and above that of self\ud efficacy. For the younger group (aged 12-13), the prediction of self care is\ud improved by better perceived support from friends. An interactive effect of\ud shared family responsibility is also reported, confirming the importance of\ud shared responsibility, between parent and child, to facilitate good self\ud management as highlighted in the literature review. None of the variables are\ud significant predictors of self care in the older group (14-18 year olds)

Topics: RJ
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). Code of Conduct, Ethical Principles and Guidelines. doi
  2. (2003). Focus Groups. In doi
  3. (1990). Health related behaviour and coping with illness in adolescence: A cross cultural perspective. In doi
  4. (1982). Making it happen: designing research with implementation in mind. Newbury Park and London: doi
  5. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2 nd Ed. doi
  6. (1993). Real World Research. doi
  7. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in -psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, doi
  8. (1998). The Handbook of Focus Group Research (2 nd Edition). Thousand Oaks,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.