Location of Repository

Supplier selection using performance self assessment reporting in the automotive industry : executive summary

By Ian Riggs

Abstract

The automotive industry has adopted the use of third party quality\ud management certification as the main quality approval mechanism for its\ud supply base. In addition, most organisations have a system of supplier\ud monitoring to measure their existing supplier's performance and this approach\ud makes it difficult for suppliers to gain new business because their quality\ud capability is unknown to the customer.\ud Two case studies were conducted to determine whether or not suppliers\ud certified to one of the automotive quality management standards had\ud improved quality performance compared to those with the generic ISO 9001/2\ud standard. The research concluded that the additional certification\ud requirements and increased costs associated with the automotive standards\ud resulted in no quality benefit. Furthermore, a third case study using second\ud party quality assessment results demonstrated that there was no correlation\ud between these audit results and achieved quality performance.\ud Therefore the research set out to answer the question :\ud How can the current supplier selection practices used within the\ud automotive industry be improved to ensure effective decision-making?\ud The Supplier Performance Evaluation Datasheet (SPED) process was\ud developed from a synthesis of current practice and input from industry experts.\ud It incorporates adaptations of best practices in non-quality assessment\ud methods. Three key elements of the SPED process are:\ud - Performance reporting\ud - Minimum performance standards\ud - Stakeholder engagement\ud The proposed process was evaluated through two case studies at Cosworth\ud Technology Ltd and from an expert opinion survey of industry experts in the\ud field of supplier management.\ud The conclusion of this study was that the SPED process would enable\ud customers to select new suppliers with high levels of confidence. It would add\ud value to all organisations taking part and it is easy to implement.\ud Ia

Topics: HD, TL
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:4068

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2001). (b)), TL 9000 Quality Management System Measurements Handbook, Release I Milwaukee :
  2. (2000). a), Doctor of Engineering:
  3. (2002). AA 1000 Assurance Standard: Guiding Principles [online]. London : The Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability.
  4. (2001). Agency Cools on Greater Role for Management Systems under IPPC",
  5. (1998). Automotive Industry Action Group AIAG doi
  6. (1985). Basic Research Methods in Social Sciences, Third Edition,
  7. (1997). Business Research :A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students, London :
  8. (2000). Doing a Literature Review : Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination, doi
  9. (2001). ford @cips. o rg], January 5 th 2004, RE : Doctoral Research Feedback. E-mail to Ian Riggs [iriggs@cosworth-technology. co. uk] Ford
  10. (1999). Guidance Document for Social Accountability 8000 (SA8000),
  11. (2002). ISO / TS 16949 Quality Systems - Automotive Suppliers -Particular Requirements for the Application of IS09000: 2000, Geneva : International Organisation for Standard isation.
  12. (1999). ISO / TS 16949 Quality Systems - Automotive Suppliers -Particular Requirements for the Application of IS09001 : 1994, Geneva : International Organisation for Standard isation. doi
  13. (1996). ISO 14001 Environmental Management System Standard. Geneva : International Organisation for Standard isation. doi
  14. (2001). Linking QS9000 to Quality Performance Outcomes",
  15. (1995). QS9000 - Quality System Requirements. Second Edition.
  16. (1990). Researching Management Accounting Practice: The Role of Case Study Methods", doi
  17. (2000). Rolling out a "World Car" : Globalisation, Outsourcing and Modularity in the Auto Industry", IMVP Working Paper, Massachusetts :
  18. (2004). Supplier Selection using Performance Self Assessment Reporting in the Automotive Industry Engineering Doctorate (Eng-D) Executive Summary Whitbread,
  19. (2000). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on Economic, Environmental and Social Performance, doi
  20. (2002). Tackling a Crisis of Confidence in IS014001",
  21. (1999). The Business Excellence Handbook, Fifth Edition. Bristol :
  22. (2004). These Checks Don't Prove Anything", Daily Telegraph,
  23. (2000). TL 9000 : Quality Management Requirements",
  24. (2001). TL 9000 : Quality Management System Overview",
  25. (2001). Vehicle Manufacturers - Statistics [online], Available from : http: //www. autoindustry. co. uk/statistics/company/vehicle. html (Accessed
  26. (1999). What They're Saying About Standards", Quality Progress, 32 (7) p 32 Rhys, G

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.