Location of Repository

After Derrida before Husserl : the spacing between phenomenology and deconstruction

By Louis N. Sandowsky

Abstract

This Ph.D. thesis is, in large part, a deepening of my M. A. dissertation, entitled: "Différance\ud Beyond Phenomenological Reduction (Epoché)?" - an edited version of which was published in\ud The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 2, Issue 2, 1989. The M. A. dissertation explores the\ud development of the various phases of the movement of epoché in Edmund Husserl's\ud phenomenology and its relevance for Jacques Derrida's project of deconstruction. The analyses not\ud only attend to the need for an effective propaedeutic to an understanding of phenomenology as\ud method, they also serve to demystify the logics of Derridean non-teleological strategy by explaining\ud the sense of such a manoeuvre - as a kind of maieutic response to the Husserlian project - which\ud operates within the horizon of a radical epoché. According to this orientation, Derrida's\ud deconstruction of phenomenology is permitted to open itself up to a phenomenology of\ud deconstruction.\ud This doctoral thesis develops these analyses and utilizes a form of critique that points the\ud way to the possibility of a phenomenological-deconstruction of the limits of Derrida's project of\ud deconstruction through the themes of epoché, play, dialogue, spacing, and temporalization. In order\ud to trace the resources from which he draws throughout the early development of deconstruction, this\ud study confines itself to a discussion on the texts published between 1962 and 1968. This subjection\ud of deconstruction to a historical de-sedimentation of its motivational, methodological, theoretical,\ud and strategic moments, involves a certain kind of transformational return to the spacing between\ud phenomenology and deconstruction that urgently puts into question the alleged supercession of\ud phenomenology by deconstruction.\ud The expression of such a 'beyond' is already deeply sedimented in contemporary\ud deconstructive writing to the point at which it is now rarely even noticed, let alone thematized and\ud brought into question. This conviction (regarding the transgression of phenomenology by\ud deconstruction) traces itself out in the form of an attitude to reading which is, in fact and in\ud principle, counter to D6rrida's own call for care. The meaning and limits of the very terms,\ud transgression, beyond, supercession, etc., must be continually subjected to deconstruction.\ud The notions of play, dissemination and supplementarity - with the concomitant sense of\ud transformational repetition that defines them - do not function as a mere excuse for lack of\ud scholarly rigour. Deconstruction is a movement of critical return, which must insert itself (with a\ud sense of irony) within the margins and intersections of that which gives itself up to this practice of\ud textual unbuilding. The strategy of play encourages the structural matrix of that with which it is\ud engaged to turn in upon itself, exposing its limits and fissures in a kind of textual analogue to a\ud psychoanalysis. To be sure, this does involve a certain kind of violence -a violation of the\ud ( system's' own sense of propriety (what is proper [propre] and closest to itself) -but in no sense is\ud this an anarchical celebration of pure destruction. We speak rather of irony, parody, satire,\ud metaphor, double-reading and other tactical devices, which permit a reorganization of the\ud deconstructed's (textual analysand's) self-relation and the possibility of playful speculation. Such\ud play demands care and vigilance in regard to the appropriation of the logics of the system with\ud which it is in a relation of negotiation. In order to play well, one must learn the game-rules

Topics: B1
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:4121

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1975). [Based on the lectures of 1927]. Die Grundprobleme der Phdnomenologie. Edited by FriedrichWilhelm von Herrmann.
  2. (1967). [editor] Phenomenology: The Philosophy of Husserl and its Interpretation. doi
  3. (1976). [first translation 193 1] Original German text -- 19 13. Hua 111]: Ideen zu einer reinen Phdnomenologie und phdnomenologischen Philosophie: Erstes Buch. Edited by Karl Schuhmarm. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff,
  4. (1964). [Lectures of 1905-1910]. See also: Oil the Phenomenology of the Consciousness qf Internal Time. Translated by John Barnett Brough.
  5. [lectures of 1907]. Hua II. - Die Idee der Phdnomenologie. Edited by Walter Biemel. The Hague: I
  6. (1973). [Preface by Newton Garner].
  7. 304 History of the Concept of Time. Trans. Theodore Kisiel. [Lectures of 1925] Indiana
  8. (1981). Alan Bass.
  9. (1928). An Introduction to Metaphysics. Trans. Michael Heim.
  10. (1990). Article: "Phenomenological Deconstruction: Husserl's Method of Abbau. doi
  11. (1960). Cartesian Meditations. Trans. Dorion Cairns. Martinus Nijhoff. doi
  12. (1991). Deconstruction: Derrida and the Myth of the Voice. University of Minnesota Press.
  13. (1992). Derrida: A Critical Reader. Edited by
  14. (1962). Die Krisie der Europdischen Wissenschqfien und die Transzendentale Phdnomenologie. The Hague: Martinus Nij1hoff,
  15. (1974). Dorion Cairns. Martinus Nijhoff. Hua VII. - Formale und Transzendentale Logik. Edited by Paul Janssen. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff,
  16. (1973). Dorion Guidefor Translating Husserl. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. doi
  17. (1989). Edmund Husserl's "Origin of Geometry'ý- An Introduction by Jacques Derrida. Translated with a preface and afterword by
  18. (1973). Emmanuel The Theory of Intuition in Husserl's Phenomenology. Trans. Andre Orianne.
  19. (1973). Erfahrung und Urteil. Edited by Ludwig Landgrebe.
  20. (1971). Heidegger). Hume, David A Treatise of Human Nature. Analytical index by
  21. (1967). Husserl: An Analysis of his
  22. (1980). Husserl: Towards a Radical Suýjeclivism. Martinus/NýJhoff.
  23. (1969). Husserl's Theory ofMcaning. Martinus Nij hoff.
  24. (1974). Husserlian Meditations. doi
  25. (1958). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. doi
  26. (1975). Ignacio-Matte The Unconscious as Infinite Sets -- an essay in bi--logic. Duckworth. doi
  27. (1929). Immanuel Critique qf Pure Reason. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. doi
  28. (1982). Includes the article Philosophy as a Kind of Writing: An Essay on Derrida. " doi
  29. (1972). Joan Stambaugh. Harper Torchbooks.
  30. (1990). Le problime de la genýse dans la philosophie de Husserl. Presses Universitaires de France. doi
  31. (1972). Les Editions de Minuit. doi
  32. (1970). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul,
  33. (1990). Philosophy at the Limit. doi
  34. (1962). Sein und Zeit Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.
  35. (1982). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Trans. Albert Hofstadter.
  36. (1992). The Concept of Time. Trans.
  37. (1989). The Deconstruction of Time. doi
  38. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963.2nd ed. The Crisis
  39. (1950). The Idea of Phenomenology.
  40. (1964). The Primacy of Perccption. Edited, with an Introduction by
  41. (1990). the Problem of Metaphysics. Translated by Richard Taft (4th edition).
  42. (1974). The Republic. Trans. Desmond Lee. Penguin Classics. First edition 1955. Second edition (revised)
  43. (1986). The Tain of the Mirror: Derrida and the Philosophy ofReflection.
  44. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible. Trans. Alphonso Lingis and edited by Claude Lefort. doi
  45. (1930). Toward a Phenomenognosy of Time Consciousness"
  46. (1978). with an introduction and additional notes, by Alan Bass. The University of Chicago Press.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.