Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Melbourne versus Sydney: semiotic reflections on first and second cities.

By Massimo Leone

Abstract

Urban marketing has recently been adopting the concept, and the label, of “second city”. However, this concept requires sharper theoretical definition in order to turn heuristic. Thus far, it has been conceived in relation to an “ideology of ranking”, strictly related to the worldview of post-modern globalization. A more fruitful definition of “second cities” results from Charles S. Peirce’s idea of secondness: a city is second to another not in quantitative, but in qualitative and relational terms. The semiotic model of Jurij M. Lotman offers a suitable methodology to analyse this relational definition, as it is exemplified by the case-study of the rivalry between Melbourne and Sydney. A historical survey of their relation shows that the latter progressively embraced an identity of “secondness” so as to successfully market an alternative vision of urban life. Melbourne therefore provides a model for non-quantitative construction of urban distinctiveness

Topics: second city, city ranking, C.S.S. Peirce’s secondness, Jurij M. Lotman’s semiotics, Melbourne vs. Sydney rivalry, General Works, A
Publisher: Globus et Locus
Year: 2014
OAI identifier: oai:doaj.org/article:dfb6fafa5998488b905362897ca23584
Journal:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://doaj.org/toc/2283-7949 (external link)
  • https://doaj.org/toc/2283-7949 (external link)
  • http://www.glocalismjournal.ne... (external link)
  • https://doaj.org/article/dfb6f... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.