Location of Repository

Governing the governors : a case study of college governance in English further education

By Denis Gleeson, Ian Abbott and Ron Hill

Abstract

This paper addresses the nature of governors in the governance of further education colleges in an English context (1). It explores the complex relationship between governors (people/agency), government (policy/structure) and governance (practice), in a college environment. While recent research has focused on the governance of schooling and higher education there has been little attention paid to the role of governors in the lifelong learning sector. The objective of the paper is to contribute to the debate about the purpose of college governance at a time when the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) commissioning era ends, and new government bodies responsible for further education and training, including local authorities, arrive. The paper analyses the nature of FE governance through the perspectives and experiences of governors, as colleges respond to calls from government for greater improvement and accountability in the sector (LSIS, 2009a). What constitutes creative governance is complex and controversial in the wider framework of regulation and public policy reform (Stoker, 1997; Seddon, 2008). As with other tricky concepts such as leadership, professionalism and learning, college governance is best defined in the contexts, cultures and situations in which it is located. College governance does not operate in a vacuum. It involves governors, chairs, principals, professionals, senior managers, clerks, community, business and wider agencies, including external audit and inspection regimes. Governance also acts as a prism through which national education and training reforms are mediated, at local level. While governing bodies are traditionally associated with the business of FE - steering, setting the tone and style, dealing with finance, funding, audit and procedural matters – they are increasingly being challenged to be more creative and responsive to the wider society. Drawing on a recent case study of six colleges, involving governors and key policy stakeholders, this paper explores FE governance in a fast changing policy environment

Topics: LB
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:4340

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2009). A Review of Governance and Strategic Leadership in English Further Education.
  2. (2007). A Seismic Shift? Policy perspectives on the changing learning and skills landscape.
  3. (1997). Boards That Make a Difference. Jossey-Bass SanFrancisco.
  4. (1999). By Appointment: Governance, Markets and Managerialism in Further Education. doi
  5. (2006). Challenging Dualism; professionalism in ‘troubled times.) Sociology. 41 doi
  6. (2009). Creative Governance in Further Education :the art of the possible? Learning and Skills Improvement Service (LSIS.
  7. (2008). Creative Leadership : A challenge of our times. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association,
  8. (2009). Creative Leadership :Developing Future Leaders – doi
  9. (2008). Creative Leadership. Paper presented at the International Symposium on the Art of Creative Leadership, doi
  10. (2003). Design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach.
  11. (2008). Developing and Implementing a Model of Strategic College Governance. CEL Practitioner Research Project.
  12. (2007). Developing and Implementing Quality Improvement Practices for College Governance. CEL Practitioner Research Projects.
  13. (2004). Dissolving the Public Realm? The logic and limits of neoliberalism.
  14. (2007). Distributed Leadership in Practice. doi
  15. (2004). Documentary Research in Education: History and the Social Sciences. doi
  16. (2008). Excellence and Fairness: achieving world class public services.
  17. (2009). Exploring the Leadership and governance implications of selfregulation for local authority and third sector providers of adult learning and skills.
  18. (2008). Further Education Colleges – Models for Success.
  19. (2007). Going forward with good governance. doi
  20. (2008). How Colleges Improve : A review of effective practice London:
  21. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data. doi
  22. (2005). Leadership Challenges. CEL Working Paper Series.
  23. (2005). Leadership: limits and possibilities. Palgrave MacMillan. 34 Guardian Newspaper doi
  24. (2004). Leading others to think innovatively together:creative leadership doi
  25. Learning and Skills Improvement Service (2009a) A Review of Governance Across the FE System.
  26. Learning and Skills Improvement Service. (2009b) Leadership Skills for Development. Governance. News Letter 9, Spring Term. Coventry and London:
  27. (1997). Local Governance. doi
  28. (2008). New Philanthropy,New Networks and New Governance in Education. doi
  29. (2008). Partnerships and organizations involved in the improvement of England’s skills base. Appendices 1-4 supplied by NAO to House of Commons Select Committee (2008/9), pp.96-111, op cit.
  30. (2006). Prosperity for all in the global economy: World Class Skills. Final Report. London: HM Treasury.
  31. (2010). Quantitative and Qualitative Methods doi
  32. (2009). Re-skilling for recovery; After Leitch, implementing skills and training policies.
  33. (2005). Realising the potential .A review of the future role of further education colleges .Annesley,
  34. (2007). Reluctant Leaders in Further Education.
  35. (2008). Review of 14-19 Education and Training. Final Report. London: Nuffield Foundation. doi
  36. (2008). Systems Thinking in the Public Sector. Axminster: Triarchy Press Sen, doi
  37. (2000). The Arts of Leadership. Oxford: doi
  38. (2008). The changing governance of education. doi
  39. (2004). The good standard for the public service.
  40. (2006). The learning leader in Further Education.
  41. (2010). UCU Campaigns Update.19/2/10.
  42. (2009). What is an effective and high performing governing body in UK Higher Education? Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.