Location of Repository

Can lay-led walking programmes increase physical activity in middle aged adults? : a randomised controlled trial

By S. E. (Sallie E.) Lamb, H. P. Bartlett, A. Ashley and W. Bird

Abstract

Study objective: To compare health walks, a community based lay-led walking scheme versus advice\ud only on physical activity and cardiovascular health status in middle aged adults.\ud Design: Randomised controlled trial with one year follow up. Physical activity was measured by questionnaire.\ud Other measures included attitudes to exercise, body mass index, cholesterol, aerobic capacity,\ud and blood pressure.\ud Setting: Primary care and community.\ud Participants: 260 men and women aged 40–70 years, taking less than 120 minutes of moderate\ud intensity activity per week.\ud Main results: Seventy three per cent of people completed the trial. Of these, the proportion increasing\ud their activity above 120 minutes of moderate intensity activity per week was 22.6% in the advice only\ud and 35.7% in the health walks group at 12 months (between group difference =13% (95% CI 0.003%\ud to 25.9%) p=0.05). Intention to treat analysis, using the last known value for missing cases,\ud demonstrated smaller differences between the groups (between group difference =6% (95% CI -5% to\ud 16.4%)) with the trend in favour of health walks. There were improvements in the total time spent and\ud number of occasions of moderate intensity activity, and aerobic capacity, but no statistically significant\ud differences between the groups. Other cardiovascular risk factors remained unchanged.\ud Conclusions: There were no significant between group differences in self reported physical activity at\ud 12 month follow up when the analysis was by intention to treat. In people who completed the trial,\ud health walks was more effective than giving advice only in increasing moderate intensity activity above\ud 120 minutes per week

Topics: RA
Publisher: BMJ Group
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:4358

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1992). A consumers guide to sub-group analyses.
  2. (2001). A postal physical activity questionnaire for the UK population. http://www.hss.coventry.ac.uk/physical activity questionnaire.htm
  3. (1985). A simple, valid step test for estimating maximal oxygen uptake in epidemiologic studies
  4. Behavioural counselling in general practice for the promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease: randomised trial. doi
  5. Campbell F What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. doi
  6. Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. doi
  7. Cost-effectiveness of a primary care based physical activity intervention in 45–74 year old men and women: a randomised controlled trial. doi
  8. Effects of walking on mortality among non-smoking retired men.
  9. (1996). Evaluation of Sonning Common Health Walks Scheme.
  10. Evaluation of the Thames Valley Health Walks Scheme. Participant’s feedback survey. OCHRAD report 9. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Health Care Research and Development,
  11. (1996). How to deal with regression to the mean in intervention studies. doi
  12. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. doi
  13. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City project.
  14. physical activity questionnaires in older men: a doubly labeled water study. doi
  15. Physicial activity and cardiovascular risk factors: effect of advice from an exercise specialist in Australian general practice.
  16. Pocock SJ.I n :Clinical trials. A practical approach. doi
  17. Promoting physical activity in general practice: a controlled trial of written advice and information materials doi
  18. (1998). Randomised controlled trial to examine the effects of a GP exercise referral programme in Hailsham, East Sussex, on modifiable coronary heart disease risk factors. doi
  19. (2000). Self-report measures and scoring protocols affect prevalence estimates of meeting physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exer doi
  20. (1993). Simpkin C The stages of exercise behaviour.
  21. (2001). Stability and convergent validity of three physical activity assessments. Med Sci Sports Exer
  22. (1998). T,e d .All change? The Health Education Monitoring Survey one year on. London: The Stationery Office,
  23. The Newcastle exercise project: a randomised controlled trial of methods to promote physical activity in primary care. doi
  24. What is the magnitude of blood pressure response to a programme of moderate intensity activity? Randomised controlled trial among sedentary adults with unmedicated hypertension.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.