Location of Repository

An evolutionary stage model of outsourcing and competence destruction : a Triad comparison of the consumer electronics industry

By Masaaki Kotabe, Michael J. Mol and Sonia Ketkar


Outsourcing has gained much prominence in managerial practice and academic discussions in the last two decades or so. Yet, we still do not understand the full implications of outsourcing strategy for corporate performance. Traditionally outsourcing across borders is explained as a cost-cutting exercise, but more recently the core competency argument states that outsourcing also leads to an increased focus, thereby improving effectiveness. However, no general explanation has so far been provided for how outsourcing could lead to deterioration in a firm‟s competence base. We longitudinally analyze three cases of major consumer electronics manufacturers, Emerson Radio from the U.S., Japan‟s Sony and Philips from the Netherlands to understand the dynamic process related to their sourcing strategies. We develop an evolutionary stage model that relates outsourcing to competence development inside the firm and shows that a vicious cycle may emerge. Thus it is appropriate to look not only at how outsourcing is influenced by an organization‟s current set of competences, but also how it alters that set over time. The four stages of the model are offshore sourcing, phasing out, increasing dependence on foreign suppliers, and finally industry exit or outsourcing reduction. The evolutionary stage model helps managers understand for which activities and under which conditions outsourcing across borders is not a viable option.\ud Results suggest that each of these firms had faced a loss of manufacturing competitiveness in its home country, to which it responded by offshoring and then outsourcing production. When a loss of competences occurred, some outsourcing decisions were reversed

Topics: HD
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:4409

Suggested articles



  1. (1984). A Resource-based View of the Firm, doi
  2. (1998). Alliance Advantage: The Act of Creating Value through Partnering, doi
  3. (1999). Assembled in Japan: Electrical Goods and the Making of the Japanese Consumer, doi
  4. (1980). Competitive Strategy, doi
  5. (1990). Corporate Product Policy and Innovative Behavior of European and Japanese Multinationals: An Empirical Investigation, doi
  6. (1996). Corporate Strategy, Public Policy and New Technologies: Philips and the Consumer Electronics Industry, doi
  7. (2002). Do Make or Buy Decisions Matter? The Influence of Organizational Governance on Technological Performance, doi
  8. (2002). DVDs Made in Japan, The Financial Times,
  9. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. doi
  10. (1994). Economies of Integration versus Bureaucracy Costs: Does Vertical Integration Improve Performance?, doi
  11. (1998). Efficiency vs. Effectiveness Orientation of Global Sourcing Strategy: A Comparison of U.S. doi
  12. (1984). Every Which Way is Up for Emerson, Financial World,
  13. (2007). Global Sourcing and Innovation: The Consequences of Losing both Organizational and Geographical Proximity, doi
  14. (1997). Grundig Charges Push Philips Back Into Red,
  15. (2001). Has Outsourcing Gone Too Far?
  16. (1999). Innovation and Inter-firm Linkages: New Implications for Policy, doi
  17. (2001). Inventing the Electronic Century, doi
  18. (1997). Making the Most of Foreign Factories,
  19. (2000). Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions, doi
  20. (1988). Manufacturing Innovation: Lessons from the Japanese Auto Industry,
  21. (2003). Maverick on Board to Revive Sony,
  22. (1976). Multinational Product Strategy: A Taxonomy for Analysis of Worldwide Product Innovation and Diffusion, doi
  23. (1973). Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise. doi
  24. (1991). Outsourcing and Industrial Decline, doi
  25. (2003). Playstation2 Detonation,
  26. (2001). Ready to turn the key: Asia's Contract Manufacturers are Poised for Japanese hand-offs,
  27. (2000). Sony may sell more production plants after Solectron deal,
  28. (2000). Sony Sells Factories in Streamlining Move,
  29. (2003). Sony to Reform Production Management Model in China,
  30. (2006). Sony's Technological Leadership in Jeopardy,
  31. (1999). Strategic Outsourcing: Leveraging Knowledge Capabilities. doi
  32. (2005). The Antecedents and Performance Consequences of doi
  33. (2005). The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production. doi
  34. (1981). The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.
  35. (1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Replications. doi
  36. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, doi
  37. (1974). The Location of Economic Activity,” doi
  38. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage, doi
  39. (1995). The Transfer of Japanese Management Styles in Two US Transplant Industries: Autos and Electronics, doi
  40. (1981). Times, Emerson Perseveres with Heart Device,
  41. (1970). Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.