Location of Repository

Mitochondrial and nuclear genes suggest that stony corals are monophyletic but most families of stony corals are not (Order Scleractinia, Class Anthozoa, Phylum Cnidaria)

By Hironobu Fukami, Chaolun Allen Chen, Ann F. Budd, Allen Collins, Carden C. Wallace, Yao-Yang Chuang, Chienhsun Chen, Chang-Feng Dai, Kenji Iwao, Charles (Charles R. C.) Sheppard and Nancy Knowlton

Abstract

Modern hard corals (Class Hexacorallia; Order Scleractinia) are widely studied because of their fundamental role in reef\ud building and their superb fossil record extending back to the Triassic. Nevertheless, interpretations of their evolutionary\ud relationships have been in flux for over a decade. Recent analyses undermine the legitimacy of traditional suborders,\ud families and genera, and suggest that a non-skeletal sister clade (Order Corallimorpharia) might be imbedded within the\ud stony corals. However, these studies either sampled a relatively limited array of taxa or assembled trees from heterogeneous\ud data sets. Here we provide a more comprehensive analysis of Scleractinia (127 species, 75 genera, 17 families) and various\ud outgroups, based on two mitochondrial genes (cytochrome oxidase I, cytochrome b), with analyses of nuclear genes (ßtubulin,\ud ribosomal DNA) of a subset of taxa to test unexpected relationships. Eleven of 16 families were found to be\ud polyphyletic. Strikingly, over one third of all families as conventionally defined contain representatives from the highly\ud divergent "robust" and "complex" clades. However, the recent suggestion that corallimorpharians are true corals that have\ud lost their skeletons was not upheld. Relationships were supported not only by mitochondrial and nuclear genes, but also\ud often by morphological characters which had been ignored or never noted previously. The concordance of molecular\ud characters and more carefully examined morphological characters suggests a future of greater taxonomic stability, as well as\ud the potential to trace the evolutionary history of this ecologically important group using fossils

Topics: QK
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:4429

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2004). A deep-sea slant on the molecular phylogeny of the Scleractinia. doi
  2. (2002). An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. doi
  3. (2006). Analyses of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and the 5.8S gene indicate that extremely high rDNA heterogeneity is a unique feature in the scleractinian coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia;
  4. (2002). Analysis of mitochondrial 12S RNA gene supports a two-clade hypothesis of the evolutionary history of scleractinian corals. doi
  5. (1980). Caribbean shallow water Corallimorpharia.
  6. (2001). CONSEL: For assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. doi
  7. (1957). Contribution a la syste ´matique des madre ´poraires fossiles. CNRS,
  8. (2004). Conventional taxonomy obscures deep divergence between Pacific and Atlantic corals. doi
  9. (2007). Debating phylogenetic relationships of the scleractinian Psammocora: molecular and morphological evidences.
  10. (1989). Evaluation of the maximum-likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. doi
  11. (1996). Evolution of scleractinian corals inferred from molecular systematics. doi
  12. (2006). Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion,
  13. (2000). Higher-level classification in the angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data. doi
  14. (2002). Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: Evidence from empirical data sets. doi
  15. (1998). Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. doi
  16. (2005). Molecular and morphological supertree of stony corals (Anthozoa: Scleractinia) using matrix representation parsimony. doi
  17. (1997). Molecular evolution of a portion of the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal gene region in scleractinian corals. doi
  18. (2000). Molecular phylogenetic hypotheses for the evolution of scleractinian corals.
  19. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. doi
  20. (1999). Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. doi
  21. (2006). Naked corals: Skeleton loss in Scleractinia. doi
  22. (2008). One third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. doi
  23. (2003). Patterns of septal biomineralization in Scleractinia compared with their 28S rRNA phylogeny: a dual approach for a new taxonomic framework. doi
  24. (2002). PAUP*:Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), version 4.0b10. doi
  25. (2003). Purvis A
  26. (1996). Reassessing evolutionary relationships of scleractinian corals. doi
  27. (2001). Regional-scale assembly rules and biodiversity of coral reefs. doi
  28. (1943). Revision of the suborders, families and genera of the Scleratinia. doi
  29. (2008). Searching for new morphological characters in the systematics of scleractinian reef corals: comparison of septal teeth and granules between Atlantic and Pacific Mussidae. Acta Zool 89: doi
  30. (2004). Secondary structure and phylogenetic utility of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 in the scleractinian corals.
  31. (2002). Slow mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution in the Anthozoa (Cnidaria). doi
  32. (2006). Systematics and evolution of Demospongiae. doi
  33. (2007). The complete mitochondrial genome of the black coral Chrysopathes formosa (Cnidaria:Anthozoa:Antipatharia) supports classification of antipatharians within the subclass Hexacorallia. doi
  34. (1998). The mitochondrial genome of the sea anemone Metridium senile (Cnidaria): introns, a paucity of tRNA genes, and a near-standard genetic code. doi
  35. (2006). The role of hybridization in the evolution of reef corals. doi
  36. (2000). TNT:Tree analysis using doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.