Location of Repository

Purchasing's strategic relevance

By Michael J. Mol

Abstract

Recently Ramsay (2001) applied the resource based view of the firm (RBV) to argue that purchasing is a largely irrelevant activity from a strategic management point of view. In this paper it will be argued to the contrary on several grounds. First, it will be shown there is a much wider theoretical base underlying the field of strategic management, from which arguments can be drawn to substantiate that purchasing can indeed have strategic impact. Second, recent developments in the RBV will be discussed to illustrate that also within the RBV purchasing is a strategic activity. Furthermore there is much empirical evidence to demonstrate that purchasing and supply management activities contribute to sustainable competitive advantage. The paper then puts forward a systematic set of criteria, which may be of value to purchasing management researchers to assess whether studied phenomena have strategic impact. Finally some hints are given for future research directions

Topics: HF
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:4482

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. doi
  2. (1985). Competitive Advantage. doi
  3. (1980). Competitive Strategy. doi
  4. (2000). Context is crucial: Commonalities, differences, and subtle differences. In: doi
  5. (1965). Corporate Strategy. doi
  6. (2001). Creating value through working with others: Interorganizational relations. doi
  7. (1990). Determinants of financial performance: A meta-analysis. doi
  8. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. doi
  9. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. doi
  10. (1994). Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: Does vertical integration improve performance? doi
  11. (1998). Efficiency vs. effectiveness orientation of global sourcing strategy: A comparison of U.S. and Japanese multinational companies. doi
  12. (1993). Explaining the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of 'market' and hierarchy'. doi
  13. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. doi
  14. (1999). Footnotes 1 There is one more problem to the view Quinn
  15. (1999). How a firm's capabilities affect boundary decisions.
  16. (1996). How Chrysler created an American Keiretsu. Harvard Business Review (July-August), doi
  17. (1998). Managing Business Relationships. doi
  18. (1969). Manufacturing – missing link in corporate strategy.
  19. (1974). Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. doi
  20. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. doi
  21. (2000). On equilibrium, organizational form, and competitive strategy. In: doi
  22. (1991). Organizations and markets. doi
  23. (1998). Purchasing and supply chain management. doi
  24. (2001). Purchasing's strategic irrelevance. doi
  25. (1995). Strategic and financial implications of global sourcing strategy: A contingency analysis. doi
  26. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. doi
  27. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. doi
  28. (1999). Strategic outsourcing: Leveraging knowledge capabilities. doi
  29. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. doi
  30. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. doi
  31. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. doi
  32. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. doi
  33. (1937). The nature of the firm. doi
  34. (1996). The social constitution of trust: doi
  35. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.