Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A statistical evaluation of the effects of gender differences in assessment of acute inhalation toxicity

By Charlotte L Price, Nigel Stallard, Stuart Creton, Ian Indans, Robert Guest, David Griffiths and Philippa Edwards


Acute inhalation toxicity of chemicals has conventionally been assessed by the median lethal concentration\ud (LC50) test (organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) TG 403). Two new methods,\ud the recently adopted acute toxic class method (ATC; OECD TG 436) and a proposed fixed concentration procedure\ud (FCP), have recently been considered, but statistical evaluations of these methods did not investigate\ud the influence of differential sensitivity between male and female rats on the outcomes. This paper presents an\ud analysis of data from the assessment of acute inhalation toxicity for 56 substances. Statistically significant differences\ud between the LC50 for males and females were found for 16 substances, with greater than 10-fold differences\ud in the LC50 for two substances. The paper also reports a statistical evaluation of the three test\ud methods in the presence of unanticipated gender differences. With TG 403, a gender difference leads to a\ud slightly greater chance of under-classification. This is also the case for the ATC method, but more pronounced\ud than for TG 403, with misclassification of nearly all substances from Globally Harmonised System (GHS) class 3\ud into class 4. As the FCP uses females only, if females are more sensitive, the classification is unchanged. If males\ud are more sensitive, the procedure may lead to under-classification. Additional research on modification of the\ud FCP is thus proposed

Topics: RC
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
Year: 2011
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2011). A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing. Arch Toxicol 1983; 54: 275–287. Price C et al. 21 at doi
  2. (2010). A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences. Hum Exp Toxicol doi
  3. (2004). Acute systemic toxicity – prospects for tiered testing strategies. Toxicol In Vitro doi
  4. (1989). Alternative approaches in median lethality (LD50) and acute toxicity testing. Toxicol Lett doi
  5. (1995). Comparison of the up-and-down, conventional LD50, and fixed-dose acute toxicity procedures. Food Chem Toxicol
  6. (1948). DixonWJ,MoodAM.Amethodforobtainingandanalyzing sensitivity data.
  7. Guidance document on acute inhalation toxicity testing. Environmental health and safety monograph series on testing and assessment.N o .3 9 .P a r i s doi
  8. (1981). Guideline for the testing of chemicals. Acute oral toxicity. doi
  9. (2004). Guidelines for testing of chemical substances. Acute inhalation toxicity– fixed concentration procedure. doi
  10. (2000). Guidelines for the testing of chemical substances.
  11. Guidelines for the testing of chemical substances. Acute inhalation toxicity (revised). doi
  12. (1998). Harmonized integrated hazard classification system for human health and environmental effects of chemical substances.
  13. (1981). Significance of the LD50-test for the toxicological evaluation of chemicalsubstances. Arch Toxicol doi
  14. (2003). Statistical evaluation of the fixed concentration procedure for acute inhalation toxicity assessment. Hum Exp Toxicol doi
  15. (1927). The error of determination toxicity. doi
  16. (1995). The fixed-dose procedure and the acute-toxic-class method: a mathematical comparison. Hum Exp Toxicol doi
  17. (1965). The up-and-down method for small samples. doi
  18. (1953). The up-anddown method with small samples.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.