Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Self-assembly and DNA binding of the blocking factor in X chromosome inactivation

By Mario Nicodemi and Antonella Prisco


X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the phenomenon occurring in female mammals whereby dosage compensation of\ud X-linked genes is obtained by transcriptional silencing of one of their two X chromosomes, randomly chosen during\ud early embryo development. The earliest steps of random X-inactivation, involving counting of the X chromosomes and\ud choice of the active and inactive X, are still not understood. To explain "counting and choice," the longstanding\ud hypothesis is that a molecular complex, a "blocking factor" (BF), exists. The BF is present in a single copy and can\ud randomly bind to just one X per cell which is protected from inactivation, as the second X is inactivated by default. In\ud such a picture, the missing crucial step is to explain how the molecular complex is self-assembled, why only one is\ud formed, and how it binds only one X. We answer these questions within the framework of a schematic Statistical\ud Physics model, investigated by Monte Carlo computer simulations. We show that a single complex is assembled as a\ud result of a thermodynamic process relying on a phase transition occurring in the system which spontaneously breaks\ud the symmetry between the X’s. We discuss, then, the BF interaction with X chromosomes. The thermodynamics of the\ud mechanism that directs the two chromosomes to opposite fates could be, thus, clarified. The insights on the selfassembling\ud and X binding properties of the BF are used to derive a quantitative scenario of biological implications\ud describing current experimental evidences on "counting and choice.

Topics: QH426
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). A 450 kb transgene displays properties of the mammalian X-inactivation center. doi
  2. (2006). An essential role for the DXPas34 tandem repeat and Tsix transcription in the counting process of X chromosome inactivation. doi
  3. (2001). Antisense transcription through the Xist locus mediates Tsix function in embryonic stem cells. doi
  4. (1997). Applications of Monte Carlo methods to statistical physics. doi
  5. (1997). Ashworth A
  6. (2002). Autosomal dominant mutations affecting X inactivation choice in the mouse.
  7. (2005). Chromatin remodeling in dosage compensation. doi
  8. (1999). Conditional deletion of Xist disrupts histone macroH2A localization but not maintenance of X inactivation.
  9. (2003). Coordination of the random asynchronous replication of autosomal loci. doi
  10. (1961). Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). doi
  11. (2002). Homozygous Tsix mutant mice reveal a sex-ratio distortion and revert to random X-inactivation. doi
  12. (2007). Identification of a Ctcf cofactor, Yy1, for the X chromosome binary switch. doi
  13. (1971). Introduction to phase transitions and critical phenomena. Gloucestershire (United Kingdom):
  14. (1983). Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation. doi
  15. (1993). Mapping the murine Xce locus with (CA)n repeats. doi
  16. (2003). Molecular biology of the gene.
  17. (1983). Non-random X-chromosome inactivation in mouse Xautosome translocation embryos location of the inactivation centre.
  18. (2007). Prisco A doi
  19. (2001). Regulation of imprinted Xchromosome inactivation in mice by Tsix.
  20. (2005). Regulation of X-chromosome counting by Tsix and Xite sequences. doi
  21. (1998). Role of the region 39 to Xist exon 6 in the counting process of X chromosome inactivation. doi
  22. (1998). Role of the Xist gene in X chromosome choosing. doi
  23. (2005). Silencing of the mammalian X chromosome. doi
  24. (1999). Targeted mutagenesis of Tsix leads to nonrandom X inactivation. doi
  25. (2007). The DXPas34 repeat regulates random and imprinted X inactivation. doi
  26. (2004). The region 39 to Xist mediates X chromosome counting and H3 Lys-4 dimethylation within the Xist gene. doi
  27. (2006). Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation. doi
  28. (2006). Transient homologous chromosome pairing marks the onset of X inactivation. doi
  29. (2001). Tsix-mediated repression of Xist accumulation is not sufficient for normal random X inactivation. doi
  30. (2005). X chromosome choice occurs independently of asynchronous replication timing. doi
  31. (1972). X-chromosome inactivation and developmental patterns in mammals. doi
  32. (2002). X-chromosome inactivation and human genetic disease. doi
  33. (2001). X-chromosome inactivation: counting, choice and initiation.
  34. (1999). Xist Yeast artificial chromosome transgenes functions as Xinactivation centers only in multicopy arrays and not as single copies.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.