Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Developing innovation through knowledge of thinking preferences

By Omar S.I. Al-Humaidi

Abstract

Many business enterprises are facing difficulties and being required to be innovative in their policies and practices as they face competition within a global economy. This research set in the AI-Jubail Petrochemical Company in Saudi Arabia, took the view that effective innovation\ud was related to the cognitive, creative and interactive skills of the workforce within the managerial and administrative framework of the company. Hence the research had three principal components namely: (i) to examine the thinking preference profiles of the workforce;\ud (ii) to design a training course in which the thinking preferences became associated with creativity, innovation and collaborative problem solving and, in contrast to other studies, (iii) to examine in detail the influence of thinking preferences in the process, performance and perceptions of the collaborative problem solving teams \ud \ud A review of research literature gave support to using the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI) as a measure of thinking preferences (which was administered to 452\ud employees) and to the application of ThinkPak and Whack Pack cards in the creativity activities. These themes were linked to illustrations and discussions of working practices\ud Overall the coursee valuations were very positive.\ud \ud A principal component of the research was a detailed study of the performances of 81 teams,in the problem solving tower building activity. The data showed diversity in the HBDI profiles and in the tower designs and implementations. An interesting result was that teams homogeneous or heterogeneous with strong HBDI profiles performed well on the task criteria, whereas those teams with weaker homogenous/heterogeneos HBDI clusters were much less\ud effective. This result, however, has to be related to the leadership capabilities in the teams. Self-report questionnaires on team contributions and interactions suggested that participants tended to follow their dominant thinking preference profiles.\ud \ud A further important component was the linking of the research materials and findings to the\ud innovative company practices. In this regard, the design of a HBDI databank browsing system and a computer based suggestions framework were outlined and illustrated. Further research suggestions included more detailed analyses of the relation of HBDI profiles and leadership\ud roles to the development of team dynamics and the authentication of the decision making

Publisher: School of Education (Leeds)
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:201

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005). (1998-2002). Improving Empathy in Procurement Bank Staff. Available at: http: /ibbdi. com/do%vnload, 'casesttidies/procuriii, g with style. pdf (Accessed
  2. A (1998-2002). To collaborative and creative thinking.
  3. (1980). A factor analysis of personal profile measures related to cerebral hemisphere specialization. Scientific and
  4. (1978). A mind of three minds: educating the triune brain.
  5. (2000). A Primer on the Knowledge Economy. Centre for Strategic Economic Studies.
  6. (1998). A Review of Brainstorming Research: Six Critical Issues for Inquiry. Monograph 302. Creative Problem Solving Group.
  7. (1998). ABC Pharmaceutical Case Study available at: http: //hbdi. com/caseStudiesý/ABC P11impff (Accessed
  8. (1963). Applied Imagination. Charles Scribner,
  9. (2000). Asian influence: Sony's Nakamura on structure and decision making. Ivey Business Journal, doi
  10. (1999). Attracting, motivating, and retaining IT professionals using parallel Virtual IT Units as a Human Resource Strategy. California Public Employee Relations Journal.
  11. (2005). Available at: httli: /ýibdi.
  12. (2005). Available at: littp: //hbdi. com/ctownload/ýýasestudies/froiiitrib.
  13. (1992). Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Perfonnance in Organizational Teams. doi
  14. (1993). Building Effective Project Teams.
  15. (1996). Competing Through Innovation. Oak Tree
  16. (2000). Creating a Learning Community. Herrmann International. Available at: http: /ilibdi.
  17. (1998). Creating a synergy of specialists. Available at: littl2: //hbdi.
  18. (2000). Engineering Your Future (3d edition).
  19. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as a Source of Learning and Development. doi
  20. (2002). Exploring the concept of "Cross functionality" in cross functional teams.
  21. (1987). Future Perfect.
  22. (1998). Growing Out of Control. Available at: http: //libdi. com/dowiilo, id-icasesttidies/ý, iroýviný, -- out of control. pd (Accessed
  23. (2004). Growth of the Middle East Petrochemical Industry. Presentation to the International Petrochemical Conference.
  24. (1962). Guiding Creative Talent. doi
  25. (1998). Hallmark: An IT Challenge. Available at: httj2: /4ibd i. com/down I oad/casestud ies/ I.. "' billion in20lOMdf (Accessed
  26. (2000). Harnessing the Power of Ideas. Kleiner, Caufleld, Perkins, and Byers, Publishers. Available at: vkhosla07')kcpb. coni 244
  27. (2000). How to Improve Group Productivity. Available at: bttp:
  28. (1982). Human Problem Solving. doi
  29. (1997). Imaginization: New Mindsets for Seeing, Organizing, and Managing. Berrett-Koehler Publishers,
  30. (1998). Improving safety factors on and off the job. Available at: http: //hb(ii.
  31. (2000). Interview with Peter Drucker "Sage Advice'
  32. (2004). Let innovation thrive. Intelligent Enterprise.
  33. (2005). Mindsights helps knowledge workers find the best thinking tools for the job. Available at: http: //www. innovationtools. com (Accessed
  34. (1993). Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering and manufacturing. A Comparison between two new product development teams. doi
  35. (1995). Primary Design and Technology: A Process for Learning.
  36. (1990). Re-engineering work.
  37. (2002). Research that reinvents the Corporation. Harvard Business Review,
  38. (1992). Serious Creativity: Using the Power of Lateral Thinking to Create New Ideas. Harper Collins, doi
  39. (1990). Shared Minds: The New Technologies of Collaboration.
  40. (2004). Should we be using Learning Styles? What research has to say to practice. Learning and SIdlIs Centre Report: ppl-84. Available at: wwwi@ILSRQ. ac. uk also at: littp: //www.
  41. (1967). Split-Brain approach to leaming problems. In Quarton, Meenechuk and Schmitt (eds), The Neurosciences: A Study Program.
  42. (1988). Techniques of Structured Problem Solving (2"d Edition). Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  43. (2000). Techniques to enhance creative thinking. doi
  44. (1926). The Art of Thought. Butler and Tanner.
  45. (1996). The Cognitive Style Index: a measure of intuition analysis for organizational research. doi
  46. (1998). The creative continuum: towards a classification of creative problem solving techniques. doi
  47. (1987). The design of work teams. doi
  48. (2002). The Free Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, doi
  49. (1998). The house of quality. doi
  50. (1995). The infonnation executives truly need. Harvard Business Review.
  51. (1997). The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Operational Intelligence.
  52. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. doi
  53. (1983). The role of creativity in innovation and economic behaviour.
  54. (1989). The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People. Simon and Schuster, doi
  55. (1989). The Validity of the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument. In Herrmann,
  56. (1996). The Whole Brain Business Book.
  57. (1994). ThinkPak: A Brainstorming Card DecIL TenSpeed Press,
  58. (1992). Whack Pack Creative Think Publishers.
  59. (1994). Why groups are less effective than their members. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.