Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Problematising current forms of legitimised participation in the examination papers for Mathematical Literacy

By Marc North and Iben M. Christiansen

Abstract

<p>In this article we argue that in South Africa the current format of legitimised participation and practice in the examination papers for Mathematical Literacy restricts successful apprenticeship in the discipline of scientific mathematics and limits empowered preparation for real-world functioning. The currency of the subject, then, is brought into question. We further argue that the positioning of the subject as a compulsory alternative to Mathematics and the differential distribution of these two subjects to differing groups of learners facilitates the (re)production and sustainment of educational disadvantage. We draw on Dowling’s theoretical constructs of differing domains of mathematical practice and positions and focus analysis on a collection of nationally set exemplar Grade 12 examination papers to identify legitimised forms of participation in the subject. We conclude by arguing for a reconceptualised structure of knowledge and participation in Mathematical Literacy and make preliminary recommendations in this regard.</p><p> </p><p> </p

Topics: Mathematical Literacy, Domains of Mathematical Practice, Mathematics, QA1-939
Publisher: AOSIS
Year: 2015
DOI identifier: 10.4102/pythagoras.v36i1.285
OAI identifier: oai:doaj.org/article:f8fa3c4d125f458ea8f3de2e7a0737e0
Journal:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://doaj.org/toc/2223-7895 (external link)
  • https://doaj.org/toc/1012-2346 (external link)
  • http://www.pythagoras.org.za/i... (external link)
  • https://doaj.org/article/f8fa3... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.