Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Constituting games : an analysis of game rules and game-processes.

By Francis Christopher Kew

Abstract

In social theory, games are frequently presented as\ud archetypal examples of activities governed by formal rules.\ud Drawing upon ethnomethodology and figurational sociology,\ud this project provides an analysis of the constituting of\ud games and identifies the inadequacies of this conventional\ud formalist wisdom. Applying and elaborating upon Garfinkel's\ud work, two case-studies are presented which are designed to\ud display the other dimensions of rule-following through which\ud players accomplish a viable game. Analysis also reveals\ud that this collaborative work does not preclude differing\ud interpretations of the rules of the game. Changes to the\ud rules are invoked in an attempt to remove their fringe of\ud incompleteness in governing game-conduct and in the\ud interests of creating and sustaining a viable game. These\ud case-studies and a typification of game-rules provides the\ud basis for analysis of the constituting of institutionalised\ud 'invasion' games such as basketball, rugby union, soccer,\ud rugby league, and netball. Interview material and\ud documentary evidence is provided to argue that rule-changes\ud are principally the outcome of a dynamic between legislators\ud and players. Players explore the insufficiency of rules in\ud precisely determining conduct in the game, and legislators\ud respond by modifying the rules, to consolidate the game and\ud thereby preserve characteristic features of game-identity\ud and game-viability. This is elaborated by applying Elias's\ud figurational analysis: changes to game rules are conceived\ud as an unintended and unanticipated consequence of powerbalances and the different interests of the functionally interdependent groups who produce game-processes. By virtue of their separate functions in this process, each group seeks to mobilise their power and resources in pursuit of their interests in the game-process. Confirmation for the perspective upon game-constitution developed in this project is sought in an analysis of one contemporary initiative to establish an invasion game as constituted by a set of hybrid rules from Australian Rules and Gaelic Football.\ud \ud This analysis of game-processes and game-rules is\ud designed to both exemplify and inform social theory, and\ud also to make a significant contribution to sociological\ud analysis of the development of contemporary sport

Publisher: School of Sociology and Social Policy (Leeds)
Year: 1990
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:474

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1970) ibid. in
  2. (1973). (1978) Brotz, H.
  3. Ball, D. & doi
  4. Burgess, R. (ed) (1988) Studies in Qualitative Methodology : Conducting Qualitative Research, London, JAI Press Caillois, R. (1961) Man, Play and Games, New York Free Press, Glencoe Carr, D. (1978) Practical reasoning and Knowing How in J. Human Hoyt
  5. C. (1975) Games, winning
  6. (1978). Education Vol. 'Sport and cultural reiFicotion : from ritual to mass consumption' in Theory,
  7. (1982). Historical Sociology Open Books, London The Game Analogy and Bourgeois
  8. University Toronto Press Social Observations and case Studies in Sills, D. L. (ed)

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.