Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The integration of pupils with special educational needs from special school into mainstream school

By Heba Mohamed Wagih Kotb


This research was conducted in order to find out what takes place in the process of integration of pupils with special educational needs from special schools into mainstream schools.\ud \ud A design was chosen that allowed the study of the various stages of transfer from a special school into a mainstream school. The design chosen was an "overlapping longitudinal" design i.e. pupils going through the different phases of the transfer process were studied in parallel. Three phases were identified: the pre transition phase. the transition phase and the post transition phase.\ud \ud Three groups of pupils were studied representing each phase of the transfer. In total twenty pupils were studied their ages ranging from six to nine with a range of Special Educational Needs. The first group the Pre transition group comprised pupils for whom a decision was not made yet to transfer them to mainstream school. The second group the Transition group comprised pupils for whom a decision had\ud been made to transfer them to a mainstream school. The third group the Post transition group comprised pupils who had already transferred into a mainstream school during the previous academic year.\ud \ud The case study approach was chosen in order to study the three groups and the methods of data collection were interviews, observation and consultation of documents. Interviews were held with parents, special school staff, educational psychologists, mainstream school stff and staff at the Local Educational Authorities' Support Services. Two schedules of observation were devised, one of them aimed to capture the general occurrences in the classroom "Classroom Observation Schedule" and the other aimed at capturing the pupils' interactions in detail, "Classroom Interaction Schedule". Tests of reliability were carried out to ensure the reliability of both schedules. A research diary was kept to compliment the observation gathered from both schedules. As for the documents that were consulted, these were pupils' statements, schools' SEN policies, LEA SEN policies and some examples of pupils' work.\ud \ud The analysis of the data gathered through the different sources were discussed for each group individually\ud and emerging themes from the three groups were discussed in the final chapter

Publisher: School of Education (Leeds)
Year: 1999
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1997). A Case for Unpacking? Redefining the role of the SENCO in the light of the Code of Practice" Support for Learning, doi
  2. (1993). A constructivist attempt to change attitudes towards children with special needs." doi
  3. (1996). A Partially successful integration: Mainstreaming in the Friuli -Venezia Giuliu region, doi
  4. (1996). A Perspective on Inclusion From England" doi
  5. (1994). A Question of Attitudes: Integrating Children with Disabilities .. into Regular Classrooms?" doi
  6. (1996). A special Education? The Experiences of newly qualified teachers during initial training" doi
  7. (1998). A Survey of Training and Professional Development for Learning Support Assistants" doi
  8. (1991). Assessing Integration at Patcham House." doi
  9. (1993). Assessing Special Educational Needs: the child's contribution" doi
  10. (1997). Attitudes of special and regular education teacher towards school integration" doi
  11. (1996). Being Apart or A Part of the Group: the Position of Pupils with Down's Syndrome in Dutch Regular Schools" . doi
  12. (1994). Bullying of Children with special needs in mainstream schools." Support for Learning, doi
  13. (1994). Children with Mild Learning Difficulties in an Integrated and in a Special School: Comparisons of Behaviour, Teasing and Teachers' Attitudes." doi
  14. (1991). Children With Special Educational Needs: Parents' Knowledge of Procedures and Provisions.' doi
  15. (1996). Choosing to campaign: a case study of parent choice, statementing and integration" doi
  16. (1994). Clusters: interschool Collaboration in Meeting Special Educational Needs in Ordinary Schools." doi
  17. (1996). Collaboration between Teachers and Speech and Language Therapists working with children with severe Learning Disabilities (SLD) : Implications for Professional Development" doi
  18. (1993). Confused and Ill Equipped?"
  19. (1995). Contentious Issues for Those Working with People with Learning Difficulties, London : David Fulton Farrell P.,
  20. (1995). Education for all : making it happen" doi
  21. (1996). Effective Inclusive schools : a study in two countries" doi
  22. (1997). English and Mathematics teachers' attitudes to integration" doi
  23. (1996). Experience of an integration link scheme: The perspectives of pupils with severe learning difficulties and their mainstream peers." doi
  24. (1989). From Special to Ordinary Schools: Case studies in integration London: Routledge Beveridge S.,
  25. (1991). How Was it For You? Pupils', Parents' and Teachers' perspectives on Integration."
  26. (2000). Ideologies and Utopias: education professionals' views of inclusion" doi
  27. (2000). Inclusion in Education from Concepts, Values and Critique to Practice" from Special Education Re-formed Beyond Rhetoric? H. Daniels (ed) London :
  28. (1996). Inclusion News from Inclusive International, Brussels : Inclusion International Jacklin A.,
  29. (1997). Inclusive Education (CSIE)
  30. (1997). Inclusive Schools for an Inclusive Society " doi
  31. (1983). Integrating special education. doi
  32. (1999). Integration of disabled children in French schools: partnership between mainstream school teachers and specialist professionals" doi
  33. (1993). Integration of students with Moderate Learning Difficulties" doi
  34. (1992). Interactions between Pupils with Severe Learning Difficulties and their Mainstream Peers." doi
  35. (1991). Interviewing as Qualitative Research : A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. doi
  36. (1997). Is Inclusivism Possible?"
  37. (1993). Is there a Sociology of Special education and Integration?"
  38. (1988). Joining Forces: A Study of Links between Special and Ordinary Schools. Windsor: NEFR-Nelson Jupp K., doi
  39. (1992). Key Parts Adults Can Play in Facilitating a Smooth Entry to Another Phase or Type of Educational Provision"
  40. (1993). Mainstream Students Talk about Integration." doi
  41. (1998). Moving Towards the Mainstream : Vision and Reality" from Promoting Inclusive Practice
  42. (1985). One in Five, London : Routledge and Kegan Pub.
  43. (1996). Parental preference and its impact upon a market force approach to special education" doi
  44. (1993). Possible Gender bias within teachers' perceptions of pupils with special needs" doi
  45. (1993). Real World Research : A Resource For Social Scientists and Practitioner -Researchers. doi
  46. (1984). Rethinking case study' doi
  47. (1997). SENCOs and the Code: A National Survey" Support for doi
  48. (1997). SENCOs of the Future?" Support for Learning 12 (3) : 116 - doi
  49. (1990). Six and seven-year-old "normal" children's talk to peers with severe learning difficulties." doi
  50. (1994). Social Acceptance by their peers of children with mental Retardation." doi
  51. (1996). Special Educational Needs Provision in Mainstream Education : A look at two different approaches"
  52. (1999). Special or Inclusive Education?"
  53. (1984). Stallard K.,(1992) "Integration: a question of need"
  54. (1979). Talk for Teaching and Learning. Schools Council Publication.
  55. (1993). Teacher support teams : An evaluation of a school-based approach to meeting special educational needs" doi
  56. Teachers' attitudes toward Increased Mainstreaming: implementing effective instruction for students with learning disabilities". doi
  57. (1993). The "Trojan Horse" of Integration". doi
  58. (1999). The Educational Attainments of pupils with Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties" doi
  59. (1993). The Great Integration Debate: part 2"
  60. (1993). The Great Integration Debate: part: 3" doi
  61. (1994). The Great Integration Debate"
  62. (1994). The Relationship between attitudes to the integration of children with special educational needs and wider socio-political views: a US-English comparison." doi
  63. (1996). Towards an Integrated Theoretical Framework for Research into Special Educational Needs" doi
  64. (1999). Towards inclusion of students with special educational needs in the regular classroom." doi
  65. (1997). Towards Inclusive Schooling "British doi
  66. (1998). Trends and Outcomes in Educational Placements for Children with Down Syndrome" doi
  67. (1990). Welfare Assistants: Are They equipped for their Role?" Support For Learning, doi
  68. (1993). What do Students with Learning Disabilities think when their general Education Teachers make Adaptations" doi
  69. (1994). What Katy did: a case study in communication between a pupil with severe learning difficulties and non-disabled classmates." doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.