Location of Repository

The motivation, process and strategy of internationalisation by Malaysian firms into the United Kingdom

By Mohd Mokhtar Tahar


This thesis considers the case of foreign direct investment into the developed country, by examining the internationalisation of Malaysian companies into the\ud United Kingdom. The study on FDI by companies from the developing counthes has been under-presented in the literature of international business and especially\ud not to the extent of those that have been conducted on western countries' multinationals. There is also lack of thorough investigation on the influence of company's characteristics on FDI practices of developing countries' transnational corporations.\ud \ud This study was pursued using a qualitative approach where data was obtained via semi-structured interview as well as documentary information. A preliminary search of the database Financial Analysis Made Easy (FAME) found 180 Malaysian companies in the U. K. which correspond to 80 parent companies in Malaysia. This was later scaled down to 45 companies that actually have active operations in the\ud U. K. The companies broadly fall into three types: conglomerates, Chinese family firms and govemment-linked companies (GLCs). A total of 19 companies in Malaysia and 8 companies in the U. K. finally agreed to participate in the research. Interviews in Malaysia took place in July to October 2003 and those in the U. K. were conducted in November 2003 to January 2004.\ud \ud Generally, the International Business (E[3) theory can be used to explain foreign direct investment by Malaysian firms into the U. K. As such, the motivation of Malaysian firms investing in the U. K. is still enveloped within resource seeking, market seeking, efficiency seeking and strategic asset seeking types of FDL However, there are other factors that are not clearly explained in the mainstream 113 theory, especially with regards to the characteristics and types of the companies that influence FDI motives and strategies such as Chinese family business,\ud conglomerate firms and GLCs. This study found that Chinese family businesses undertake FDI to increase shareholder value, that is, the family wealth or family capital accumulation. The motive of conglomerate firms is either to create new core competence in the hierarchy, to strengthen the existing core competence and/or risk hedging. For the GLCs, the goal to help support the Malaysian government\ud policy on transfer of technology has driven them to undertake similar investments in the U. K.\ud \ud Other specific factors have also driven the investment namely the entrepreneurship and opportunistic behaviour of the business actors i. e. the major shareholder in the\ud Malaysian companies. The strategy of investment has a strong tendency towards 'emergent strategy' rather than 'deliberate strategy'. The study also shows that\ud Malaysian companies prefer wholly-owned subsidiaries where the parents are in control of finance and determine the business directions. There is, however, limited direct involvement of parent companies' personnel in the running of the subsidiaries

Publisher: Leeds University Business School
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:739

Suggested articles



  1. 1). Internationalization of Finns from LDC: Evidence from the ASEAN Region. In
  2. (2003). 16). The Wealthiest of then All,
  3. (2002). Absolute and Relative Resources as DeterinInants of International Acquisition. doi
  4. (2000). Announcement Submitted to the Bursa Malaysia by Abric Berhad on
  5. (2005). Annual Report 2004. Percetakan Nasional Berhad. Malaysia
  6. (2005). ASEAN Statistics [Online]. Available on: htt-p: ýw. aseanýeLc. org [Accessed June25,20051-Asiedu,
  7. (1995). Asean'S Foreign Direct Investment into the People's Republic of China. Discussion Paper No. 95. Massey University, New Zealand. Availabe: URL: http: //econ.
  8. (1969). Available on: http: ///www.
  9. (1997). Both Sides of Corporate Diversification: The Value Impacts of Geographic and Industrial Diversification. doi
  10. (1995). Braziallian. Emerging Multinationals: A Conduit for Export of Technology, doi
  11. (1988). Brazilian Multinationals. Columbia Journal of World Business. Winter 1988,13-23
  12. (1989). Building Theories from Case Studies Research, doi
  13. (1988). Chaebol: The South Korean Conglomerates. Business Horizon, March-Aphl doi
  14. (1998). Chinese business in Malaysia: Accumulation, doi
  15. (2004). Chinese Diaspora as a Virtual Nation: Interactive Roles between Economics and Social Capital, Political Studies, doi
  16. (1985). Competitive Advantages: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. doi
  17. (2002). Cooperation and Competition in the World Economy.
  18. (2003). Corporate Divers, ficatlon and Shareholder Value: A Survey of Recent Literature. doi
  19. (2000). Corporate Diversification, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value, The Singapore Evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, doi
  20. (2001). Corporate Diversification, Value Maximization, and Organizational Capabilities. doi
  21. (1994). Corporate Diversification. Journal of Economic Perspectives, doi
  22. (2004). Corporate Ownership around the World.
  23. (1981). Dawn Raiders'Quite Coup: Malaysia's Early-Moming Takeovers of British-based Plantation Group Leaves London Brokers Astounded.
  24. (1999). Determinants of Autonomy in Multinational Cotporation Subsidiaries. doi
  25. (1984). Differences Among Exporting Finn Based on Their Degree of Internalization. doi
  26. (2002). Diversification, Concentration and Economic Perforniance: Korean Business Groups. Review ofIndustrial Organization,
  27. (1991). Economic Report doi
  28. (2003). Economic Report 200212003. Percetakan Nasional Berhad, Kuala Lumpur.
  29. (2002). Entrepreneurship and the Interriationalisation of Asian firms: An Institutional Perspective,
  30. (1981). Explaining Outward Direct Investment of Developing Countries: doi
  31. (1994). Exploiting Your Synergy Potential: Promoting Collaboration Between Business Units, Long Range Planning, doi
  32. (1990). Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach, doi
  33. (1989). Foreign Direct Investment by Small-and Medium-Sized Enterprises, The Theoretical Background. doi
  34. (1956). Foreign Investment and the Growth of the Finns,
  35. (1997). Foreign Investment in Southeast Asia in Historical Perspective. doi
  36. (2005). forthcoming). Globalizing Asian business: dynamics of change and adjustment in
  37. (2002). Global Diversification, Industrial Diversification, and Finn Value. doi
  38. (2000). Globalizing Chinese Business Finns: Where are They Coming From, Where are They Heading? In
  39. (1992). Golden Hope Story "Looking Back". Available: http: //www.
  40. (2003). Holly Water Chief, The Guardian. London Mackie,
  41. (1998). How Owners Influence Strategy-A Comparison of Owner-controlled and Manager- Controlled Firms. Long Range Planning, doi
  42. (1980). Industrial Growth, Employment, and Foreign Investment In Peninsular Malaysia. Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur Hood, doi
  43. (2003). Industry Evolution and Internationalization of Finns From a Newly Industrialized Economy. doi
  44. (2001). Inside Chinese Business: A guide for Managers Worldwide. doi
  45. (2002). Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influence on Entry Mode Choice and Performance. doi
  46. (1992). Internalization, An Event Study Test. doi
  47. (1992). International Production in volatile regulatory Environment: the Influence of National Regulatory Policy on the Spatial Strategies of Transnational Corporations, doi
  48. (1997). Internationalisation Strategies, Palgrave. London
  49. (1988). Internationalization: Evolution of a Concept. In
  50. (1996). Interrelationships Across Business,
  51. (2003). Interviewing Elites in International Organizations: A Balancing Act for the Researcher, Available: http: //www.
  52. (2001). Intra-Ethnic Cooperation in Transnational Perspecti'Ve. ' Malaysian Chinese Investments in the United Kingdom, Conference Paper Presented at the Third Malaysian Social Science Conference held at UKM,
  53. (1996). Korean Foreign Direct Investment in Europe: The Determining Force. The Pacific Review, doi
  54. (1993). Malaysian industrialization in historical perspective"
  55. (1997). Malaysian Investment in South Africa. Centre for Social and Development Studies.
  56. (1993). Managing the Multinational, Confronting the Global-Local Dilemma.
  57. (2003). Manual or Electronic? The Role of Coding in Qualitative Data Analysis. doi
  58. (1988). Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development. doi
  59. (1984). Multinational Corporation: Control Systern and Delegation Issues, doi
  60. (1990). Multinational Corporations and State-owned Enterprises: A New Challenge
  61. (1980). Multinational Enterprises from the Third World. doi
  62. (1981). Multinationals, Mining and Development:
  63. (2002). Multionational Enterprises and the End of Global Strategy, In Dunning (Eds. ). Multinational Firms, The Global-Local Dilemma- Studio-, in Global Competition Series, doi
  64. (2000). National Culture, Transaction Cost and the Choice between Joint Venture and Wholly-owned Subsidiary. doi
  65. (1988). National Economic Recovery Plan: Agenda for Action. Percetakan Nasional Berhad. Kuala Lumpur Economic Planning Unit
  66. (1997). Network Relationships and Internationalization ' Process of Small Software Finns. In doi
  67. New York UNCTAD (2004b), India Outward FDL A Giant Awakening. UNCTAD/DITE UNCTAD (2004c). Outward FDI From Brazil: Poised for Take-off.
  68. (1995). Overseas Chinese Networks: Understanding the Enigma. Long Range Planning, doi
  69. P (2000c). The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations. doi
  70. (2000). Perindustrian dan Pembangunan Ekonomi A Malaysia, Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka,
  71. (1996). Qualitative Researching. doi
  72. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London, Unwin Hyman Ltd. doi
  73. (2000). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson Education Limited,
  74. (1990). Review,
  75. (2001). Social Research Methods. doi
  76. (1997). Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process.
  77. (1986). Strategic Management and State-Owned Enterprises: An European Perspective.
  78. (1994). Strategy Profile of indigenous MNEs from the NEEs, the Case of South Korea and Taiwan. doi
  79. (1995). Taiwan's Outward Direct Investment; Has Domestic Investment been Hollowed out? In
  80. (1980). Takeovers: A Respite, not Reprieve: Sime Darby Gives up its Chase of Guthrie Corporation and Pockets a Healthy Profit in the Process. Far Eastern Economic Review 110(52), 60 Pitelis,
  81. (2001). Thailand, In Gomez
  82. (2002). The Concept of Learning in Uppsala Internationalization process model: A critical Review. International Business Review, doi
  83. (2003). The Cost (and Benefits? ) of Diversified Business Groups: The Case of Korean Chaebol. doi
  84. (1990). The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management. doi
  85. (2000). The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and doi
  86. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. doi
  87. (2002). The Effect of Strategic Motives of the Choice of Entry Modes: an Empirical Test of International Franchisers,
  88. (2001). The Eight Malaysia Plan 2001-2005. Percetakan Nasional Berhad, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.
  89. (2001). The Eight Malaysian Plan,
  90. (1991). The Experience Factor in Foreign Market Entry Behaviour of Service Firm. doi
  91. (2002). The Future of Multinational Enterprises, Basingstoke: Palgrave doi
  92. (2002). The Impact of Asian Crisis on Diaspora Chinese Tycoons. Geoforum, doi
  93. (2005). The Internationalisation of 'High Perfort-ning'
  94. (1997). The Internationalization of Bom Globals: An Evolutionary Process? doi
  95. (1975). The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments, Journal ofManagement Studies, doi
  96. (1986). The Investment Development Cycle Revisited, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, doi
  97. (1992). The Management of Large Groups: Asia and Europe Compared. doi
  98. (1988). The Multinational Corporation's Degree of Control Over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation.
  99. (2001). The Multinational Enterprise as an Organization, doi
  100. (1990). The Network Structure of East Asian economies, doi
  101. (1997). The Perception and Measurement of Transaction Costs, doi
  102. (2004). The Rationale for Groups: Evidence from East Asia. Available on: http: www. oecd. org [Accessed April 29,
  103. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. doi
  104. (2005). The Rise of Ersatz Capitalism in Southeast Asia.
  105. (2002). The Role That Foreign Acquisition of Asian Companies Played in the Recovery of The Asian Financial Crisis. Multinational Business Review, Spring 2002,10(l),
  106. (1993). The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. doi
  107. (2001). The Times doi
  108. (1985). The Transaction Cost Approach to Vertical Integration: An Empirical Examination. The Review ofEconomics and Statistics,
  109. (1981). The Transition of the Japanese Keiretsu in the Changing Economy, doi
  110. (2005). The Transition of the Japanese Keiretsu in the Changing Economy. doi
  111. (1983). Third World Multinationals. doi
  112. (1988). Tit For Tat in Small Steps: The Internationalization of Swedish Banks. doi
  113. (1998). Transnalisation Corporation and Business Networks, Hong Kongfirms in the Asean Region.
  114. (2005). UKLA Listing Rules, available: http: //www.
  115. (1995). Using Semi-Structured Interviews in Small-Scale Research, A Teacher's Guide. The Scottish Council for Research in Education.
  116. (1997). Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets, Harvard Business Review,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.