Location of Repository

Doing qualitative research with people and organisations: How do researchers understand and negotiate their research relationships?

By Tom Clark

Abstract

Using the child and family research arena as a base, and by generating and analysing empirical data according to the grounded theory methodology proposed by Glaser and Strauss (1967), this thesis adopts an empirical approach to the study of the research relationship. More specifically, it explores how researchers (n=13) understand the research process and, in particular, how they negotiate the process of doing research with people and organisations. Four key social actors are identified and discussed. These are: the researchers, the funding agencies, the gate-keepers, and the research groups. Whilst, the issues involved with the post-data collection stages of research are not presented here, the issues associated with the pre-data-collection phases and data-collection phases of research are articulated. Within the pre-data collection phases of research, the process of research generation and how the interests of researchers converge with funding agencies are examined and discussed. Similarly, the roles of gate-keeping groups, who straddle the pre-data collection and data collection phases of research, are also explored and the supporting mechanisms of these relationships highlighted. Finally, the thesis explores the nature of researchers’ relationships with research groups by distinguishing between categorical, collective, and formal, research groups. The mechanisms that support and challenge engagement with these groups are identified and the ethical devices that researchers use to negotiate and manage these relationships are also explored

Publisher: Sociological Studies (Sheffield)
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:934

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1987). A framework for discussing ethical issues in feminist research: A review of the literature, in, Griffiths, V. (ed) Writing Feminist Biography 2: Using Life Histories—Studies in Sexual Politics. Manchester:
  2. (1954). A note on interviewing tactics.
  3. (2007). Accessing socially excluded people: Trust and the gatekeeper in the researcher-participant relationship. doi
  4. (2003). Accessing the community: gaining insider perspectives from the outside, doi
  5. (2003). Accessing the research setting: the politics of research and the limits to enquiry. doi
  6. (2007). Action research. doi
  7. (1990). Afro-Caribbean Elderly People: Coping with Ageing. Social Care Practice Centre:
  8. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. doi
  9. (1999). American Sociological Association (ASA)
  10. (2004). An equal relationship?: People with learning difficulties getting involved with research, doi
  11. (2000). An untold story? Doing funded qualitative research,
  12. (1999). Anticipating the problems of contract social research.
  13. (2007). Any port in a storm: fieldwork difficulties in dangerous and crisis-ridden situations. doi
  14. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. doi
  15. (2004). Bereaved parents‘ experience of research participation. doi
  16. (1997). Bias in social research. Sociological Research Online, 2. Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk /socresonline /2/1/2.html
  17. (2004). Boyzone and bhangra: the place of popular and minority cultures. doi
  18. (2001). Challenging Transitions: Young people‘s views and experiences of Growing Up. London: Save the Children.
  19. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production. doi
  20. (2005). Children and young people‘s participation and nonparticipation in research. doi
  21. (2000). Children of our time,
  22. (2003). Commercialising higher education in the UK: the state, industry and peer review. doi
  23. Community Research Group (NBCRG) (2003) Young People and Politics. Institute for Conflict Research (ICR):
  24. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. doi
  25. (2007). Confidentiality and autonomy: The challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity. doi
  26. (2006). Confronting the Anti-Democrats: the unethical nature of ethical regulation in social science.
  27. (2002). Consenting to what? Issues of access, gatekeeping and ‗informed‘ doi
  28. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. doi
  29. (2000). Constructivist and objectivist grounded theory, in, doi
  30. (1996). Crown Street Revisited, doi
  31. (1999). De onwelkome boodschap of hoe de vrijheid van wetenschap bedreigd wordt.
  32. (1998). Designing funded research qualitative research, doi
  33. (2001). Doing a Literature Search: A Comprehensive Guide for the Social Sciences.
  34. (1997). Doing Disability Research.
  35. (1976). Doing field research.
  36. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill
  37. (2005). Doing prison research: Views from the inside. doi
  38. (1999). Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook.
  39. (1993). Doing research in post-Tiananmen China,
  40. (1993). Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. doi
  41. (2007). Doing research on the ethics of doing research. doi
  42. (1977). Doing Sociological Research. London: Allen and Unwin.
  43. (2000). Effects of telephone versus Face-to-Face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption. doi
  44. (1996). Elite interviewing: Approaches and pitfalls. doi
  45. (1997). Emancipatory research: realistic goal or impossible dream?, in,
  46. (1992). Emergence vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill
  47. (1999). Empowerment: the path to partnership?,
  48. (2002). Encouraging and Maintaining Participation in the Families and Children Survey: Understanding why people take part,
  49. (2002). Encouraging discerning research involvement by schools and developing the role of
  50. (1999). Encouraging Ethical and Non-Discriminatory Research with Mental Health Consumers: Mental Health Commission Occasional Publications: No 1. Mental Health Commission (MHC):
  51. (2006). Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disabilities in research. doi
  52. (2002). Ethics and feminist research: Theory and practice, doi
  53. (2003). Ethics and the ruling relations of research production. doi
  54. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics, doi
  55. (2003). Ethics in qualitative research and evaluation. doi
  56. (2001). Ethics, deception, and ‗those Milgram experiments‘. doi
  57. (2004). Ethics, Social Research and Consulting with Children and Young People.
  58. (1989). Ethics: The failure of positivist science.
  59. (1989). Ethnography without tears. doi
  60. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. doi
  61. (1999). Evaluation and social work practice. doi
  62. (2001). Excluded Parents: the deracialisation of parental involvement. doi
  63. (2000). Feminism and Educational Research Methodologies.
  64. (1987). Feminism and Methodology. doi
  65. (1999). Feminist Perspectives on Ethics. doi
  66. (2000). Fieldwork, Participation and Practice: Ethics and Dilemmas in Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks,
  67. (2006). Focusing researchers‘ minds: contrasting experiences of using focus groups in feminist qualitative research. doi
  68. (1999). Football Hooliganism: Knowing the Score. doi
  69. (2001). For love or money? An exploratory study of why drug injectors participate in research. doi
  70. (1973). For Sociology. doi
  71. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations and social responsibilities, in,
  72. (2002). Foundations of Sociology: Towards a Better Understanding of the Human World.
  73. (2003). From ethics to analytics: aspects of participants' orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices.
  74. (1990). Funding large-scale qualitative sociology. doi
  75. (2001). Funding social science research in academia. doi
  76. (1993). Gaining access, in,
  77. (1979). Gender and age in fieldwork and fieldwork education: No good thing is done by a man alone. doi
  78. (1998). Gender, methodology and people‘s ways of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in doi
  79. (2005). Generalisation in qualitative research.
  80. (1995). Grant writing: The uncertain road to funding. doi
  81. (1989). Grey areas: Ethical dilemmas in educational ethnography,
  82. (1994). Grounded theory methodology, in, doi
  83. (2003). Growing research with older people. doi
  84. (1990). Handbook of Social and Evaluation Anxiety. doi
  85. (1999). Having a say: involving young people in research on leaving care,
  86. (2003). Hindsight, foresight and insight: the challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. doi
  87. (2006). How to Gather Views on Service Quality: Guidance for Social Landlords. Edinburgh: Communities Scotland/Scottish Executive.
  88. (2005). Impact of Selective Funding
  89. (2001). Impairment and disability: constructing an ethics of care that promotes human rights. doi
  90. (2004). Improving the Use of Research in Social Care Practice: Knowledge Review 7. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  91. (1990). In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. doi
  92. (2000). Influence or Irrelevance: Can Social Science Improve Government?
  93. (2007). Informed consent and the research process: following rules or striking balances? doi
  94. (2005). Informed consent in Social Research: A literature review. doi
  95. (2007). Informed consent, gatekeepers and go-betweens: negotiating consent in child- and youthorientated institutions. doi
  96. (1978). Inside the Whale: Ten Personal Accounts of Social Research. doi
  97. (2006). Insiders and outsiders: Levels of collaboration in research partnerships across resource divides. doi
  98. (2006). Institute for Excellence doi
  99. (1997). Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, doi
  100. (2000). Interpretivism and generalization. doi
  101. (2002). Interviewer and interviewee relationships between women.
  102. (1972). Interviewing an ultra-elite. doi
  103. (1954). Interviewing in Social Research. doi
  104. (1993). Interviewing survivors of marital rape: Doing feminist research on sensitive topics, in,
  105. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms, in, doi
  106. (1996). Interviews. doi
  107. (2003). Issues concerning the effective conduct of research in Councils with Social Service Responsibility: Working paper for the Department of Health. Centre for Child and Family Research,
  108. (2002). Issues of ethnicity in researching older women. doi
  109. (1993). Issues of power in health and welfare,
  110. (1981). It's great to have someone to talk to': the ethics and politics of interviewing women, in,
  111. (2006). It‘s no skin off my nose‖: Why people take part in qualitative research. doi
  112. (2004). Laud Humphreys and research ethics. doi
  113. (2004). Let‘s Move On‖. Black and Minority Ethnic Older People‘s Views on Research Findings. doi
  114. (1995). Listening to Children: Children, Ethics and Social Research.
  115. (2003). Maintaining contact with drug users over an 18-month period. doi
  116. (2006). Make yourself at home: the social construction of research roles in family studies. doi
  117. (2003). Making a Mess with Method. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University. Available at: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/law-making-amess-with-method.pdf
  118. (1964). Method and Measurement in Sociology. doi
  119. (2007). Methodological dilemmas: gatekeepers and positionality in Bradford. Ethnic and Racial Studies, doi
  120. (1994). Methods, practice and epistemology: The debate about feminism and research, in
  121. (1994). Ministers and mandarins: educational research in elite settings,
  122. (2004). Moving out of conflict: The contribution of integrated schools in Northern Ireland to identity, attitudes, forgiveness and reconciliation. doi
  123. (2002). Muslim women in higher education: new sites of lifelong learning. doi
  124. (2007). My life after death: connecting the field, the findings and the feelings.
  125. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. doi
  126. (2007). Nostalgia, goodness and ethical paradox. doi
  127. (1982). Observational research on the National Front,
  128. (1981). On interviewing one‘s peers. doi
  129. (1978). On the analysis of observational data: A discussion of the worth and uses of induction techniques and respondent validation.
  130. (1968). On the ecological validity of laboratory deceptions.
  131. (1999). Paths to Empowerment.
  132. (2002). Patients‘ consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: Interview and survey data. doi
  133. (1996). Paying respondents and informants.
  134. (1998). Pearls, pith, and provocations: Common pitfalls in grounded theory research.
  135. (1981). Philosophical basis for a new paradigm,
  136. (1991). Playing back the tape back: Early days in the field, in, doi
  137. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research,
  138. (1970). Positively Black. Englewood Cliffs,
  139. (2003). Practitioners as gatekeepers and researchers: Family support outcomes, doi
  140. (1998). Public research, private concerns: Ethical issues in the use of open-ended interviews with people who have learning difficulties. doi
  141. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, doi
  142. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, doi
  143. (1993). Qualitative interviewing, in, doi
  144. (1994). Qualitative methods: Their history in sociology and anthropology, in,
  145. (1999). Qualitative research in social work. doi
  146. (1981). Question-order effects on presidential popularity. doi
  147. (1994). Re-Thinking Social Research: Anti-Discriminatory Approaches in Research Methodology.
  148. (1976). Realities of Social Research: An Empirical Study of British Sociologists. London: doi
  149. (2004). Reassessing the research relationship: location, position and power in fieldwork accounts. doi
  150. (2000). Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research, in,
  151. (2004). Recording technologies and the interview in sociology,
  152. (2005). Recruiting older research participants: lessons from deprived neighbourhoods, in,
  153. (1995). Reducing systematic bias in studies of general practitioners: the use of a medical peer in the recruitment of general practitioners in research. doi
  154. (1997). Reflections on Interviewing Women MP‘s. doi
  155. (2006). Regeneration for all?: Measuring and enhancing levels of Black and other racial minorities' economic activity. doi
  156. (1986). Remaining an outsider: membership as a threat to research rapport. doi
  157. (2003). Reporting and presenting qualitative data, in,
  158. (2000). Research and Development for a First Class Service - R&D Funding in the New NHS. London: Department of Health.
  159. (2005). Research as Empowerment? Report of a Series of Seminars Organised by the Toron to Group.
  160. (2005). Research Ethics and Regulation in the UK: The Case of Informed Consent. Paper presented at the 1st International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry,
  161. (2000). Research Forum (NERF)
  162. (2001). Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. London: Department of Health. doi
  163. (2003). Research Governance in Social Care: the Findings of the Baseline Assessment Survey. London: Department of Health.
  164. (2002). Research in black and white. doi
  165. (1991). Research Methods in Social Relations. doi
  166. (2005). Research Participants' Views on Use of Verbatim Quotations. doi
  167. (2005). Research Participants‘ Views on the Use of Verbatim Quotations. doi
  168. (2005). Research with participants in problem experience: Challenges and strategies. doi
  169. (2004). Researchers and their ‗Subjects‘: Ethics, Power, Knowledge and Consent. doi
  170. (1998). Researchers‘ attitudes toward teacher-informants: Some ethical implications for research and evaluation. doi
  171. (2003). Researching black parents: making sense of the role of research and the researcher. doi
  172. (2005). Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research. doi
  173. (2006). Researching researchers: lessons for research ethics. doi
  174. (2005). Researching vulnerable groups: ethical issues and the effective conduct of research in local authorities. doi
  175. (1994). Researching women's lives or studying women's oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research, in,
  176. (2003). Resistence to evaluation: A psychological perspective. doi
  177. (1978). Risk and benefit to subjects of fieldwork,
  178. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. doi
  179. (2002). Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health (SCMH)
  180. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture, and credibility. doi
  181. (1993). Sensitivity as a problem in field research: A study of routine policing in doi
  182. (1981). Settling Accounts with the Parasite People.
  183. (2003). Sexual Orientation Research Phase 2: The Future of LGBT Research - Perspectives of Community Organisations. Scottish Executive:
  184. (2002). Signing you life away? Why Research Ethics Committees (REC) shouldn't always require written confirmation that participants in research have been informed of the aims of a study and their rights - the case of criminal populations. doi
  185. (2007). Situational logic in social science inquiry: From economics to criminology. doi
  186. (2001). Small Voices Big Noises, Lay involvement in Health Research: Lessons From Other Fields.
  187. (2003). Social Care Knowledge: SCIE-like Typologies. London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice (Working Paper 13).
  188. (1996). Social Identity. doi
  189. (2003). Social Research Association (SRA)
  190. (2002). Social Research Council (ESRC) doi
  191. (2008). Social Research Council (ESRC) Research Methods Network (2002-2007) Available at: http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/ (Accessed
  192. (1982). Social Research Ethics: An Examination of the Merits of Covert Participant Observation. doi
  193. (2004). Social Research Methods. doi
  194. (1987). Social Science Research and Government: Comparative Essays on Britain and the United States. Cambridge: doi
  195. (1997). Some methodological and epistemological issues raised by doing feminist research on non-feminist women. doi
  196. (2002). Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association. Durham: British Sociological Association. Available at: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/index.php?link_id=14&area=item1
  197. (1990). Strategic uses of narrative in the presentation of self and illness: A research note. doi
  198. (2002). Strategies for managing evaluation anxiety: Toward a psychology of program evaluation. doi
  199. (1992). Street corner society revisited: New questions about old issues. doi
  200. (1992). Street corner society: Cornerville revisited. doi
  201. (1983). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum (3 rd Edition). Chicago: doi
  202. (1995). Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, doi
  203. (1972). Subject effects in laboratory research: An examination of subject roles, demand characteristics, and valid inference. doi
  204. (1993). Surely you're not in this just to be helpful? Access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. doi
  205. (2001). Survey Nonresponse.
  206. (1977). Talking about Prison Blues,
  207. (1967). Tally's Corner: A Study of Negro Streetcorner Men. doi
  208. (1982). Tea room trade: means and ends in social research,
  209. (2004). The Anonymity of Research Participants: Assumptions, Ethics and Practicalities.
  210. (1972). The British Association scandal: The effect of publicity on a sociological investigation. doi
  211. (2001). The Business of Research: Issues of Policy and Practice. doi
  212. (1997). the Collaborative Centre for Priority Services Research,
  213. (1984). The development of rapport through the negotiation of gender on field work among police.
  214. (2000). The discipline and practice of qualitative research,
  215. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. doi
  216. (1994). The Dynamics of Race and Gender: Some Feminist Interventions. London: Taylor and Francis.
  217. (1996). The effect of interviewer‘s gender on the interviewing process: A comparative enquiry.
  218. (2001). The ethical and methodological complexities of doing research with `vulnerable' young people. doi
  219. (2006). The Ethics of Care. Oxford: doi
  220. (1992). The ethics of open methods. doi
  221. (1998). The ethics of rapport: Institutional safeguards, resistance, and betrayal. doi
  222. (1996). The ethics of social research with children: an overview. doi
  223. (2004). The Ethics of Survivor Research: Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Survivor Research. Bristol: Policy Press in association with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  224. (2002). The gatekeeper. doi
  225. (1982). The key informant technique: a non-ethnographic application,
  226. (1997). The Limitations of Social Research. doi
  227. (1977). The making of a female researcher: role problems in fieldwork. doi
  228. (1977). The moral career of a research project, in,
  229. (1994). The Myth of the Framework: doi
  230. (1981). The National Front. doi
  231. (1988). The observers observed: French survey researchers at work. doi
  232. (1986). The Politics and Ethics of Fieldwork.
  233. (1998). The politics of community: Negotiation and consultation in research on women‘s health.
  234. (1995). The Politics of Social Research. doi
  235. (2001). The principle of assumed consent: the ethics of gatekeeping. doi
  236. (1993). The problems of researching sensitive topics: An overview and introduction, doi
  237. (1999). The Quality of Qualitative Research. doi
  238. (1988). The relationship of observer to observed when studying up,
  239. (1984). The Research Process in Educational Settings: Ten Case Studies. doi
  240. (2007). The research question in social research: What is it‘s role? doi
  241. (2001). The researched opinions on research: Disabled people and disability research. doi
  242. (2001). The researched opinions on research: Visually impaired people and visual impairment research. doi
  243. (2004). The researcher‘s agenda for evidence. doi
  244. (1967). The Rise and Fall of Project Camelot. doi
  245. (2006). The role of rapport: Lessons learned from conducting research in a primary care setting. doi
  246. (1996). The Salt of Social Science. Sociological Research Online. 1, 1. Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/1/1/1.html Stephens,
  247. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. doi
  248. (1964). The Springdale case: Academic bureaucrats and sensitive townspeople, in,
  249. (2005). The usefulness of oral life (hi)story to understand and empower: The case of trans-racial adoption. doi
  250. (2004). Theft and ethics in life portrayal: Lolly - the final story. doi
  251. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill
  252. (2001). Thinking Sociologically. doi
  253. (2006). This morning I'm a researcher, this afternoon I'm an outreach worker‘: Ethical dilemmas in practitioner research. doi
  254. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism, in,
  255. (1995). Transcription quality as an aspect of rigour in qualitative research. doi
  256. (1995). Transforming qualitative research methods. Is it a revolution? doi
  257. (1999). Truancy and perceived school performance: an alcohol and drug study of UK teenagers. doi
  258. (2003). Types and Quality of Knowledge in Social Care. Knowledge Review 3. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  259. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. doi
  260. (1966). Unobtrusive Measures. doi
  261. (2007). Upward turning points and positive rapport-development across time in researcher—participant relationships. doi
  262. (2004). User Controlled Research: Its Meaning and Potential. London: Shaping our Lives and
  263. (2002). User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation? doi
  264. (2007). User Involvement, doi
  265. (1997). Users and Social Science Research: Policy, Problems, Possibilities. doi
  266. (1995). Using Computers in Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks,
  267. (2002). Using focus groups to explore older people's attitudes to end of life care. doi
  268. (2006). Using Verbatim Quotations in Reporting Qualitative Social Research: The Views of Research Users. doi
  269. (2000). Varieties of social research: A typology. doi
  270. (2006). What counts as research? The implications for research governance in social care. doi
  271. (2003). What did you think about that?‖ Researching children‘s perceptions of participation in a longitudinal genetic epidemiological study. doi
  272. (2005). What do we mean by empowerment?, in, doi
  273. (2006). What to do about values in social research: the case for ethical reflexivity in the sociology of education. doi
  274. (1980). Who Should Know What? Social Science, Privacy and Ethics. doi
  275. (2000). Who wants to be a social engineer? A commentary on David Blunkett‘s speech to the ESRC. doi
  276. (1992). Whose Cornerville is it anyway? doi
  277. (1967). Whose Side Are We On? doi
  278. (2006). Why People Get Involved in Health and Social Care Research: A Working Paper.
  279. (1997). Working with Children and ‗Lost Parents‘.
  280. (2004). Working with managers to improve services: changes in the role of research in social care. doi
  281. (2002). Working with older women from communities in Sheffield: methods issues.
  282. (2003). Working with older women in research: Some methods-based issues, doi
  283. (2005). Writing for publication: what counts as a high status, eminent academic journal? doi
  284. (2006). Writing small discoveries: an explanation of fresh observers‘ observations. doi
  285. (2001). Young adults with cancer: The effect on parents and families. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.