Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Development of the web-based Spanish and Catalan versions of the Euroqol 5D-Y (EQ-5D-Y) and comparison of results with the paper version

By N. (Noemí) Robles, L. (Luis) Rajmil, D. (Dolors) Rodriguez-Arjona, M. (Marta) Azuara, F. (Francisco) Codina, H. (Hein) Raat, U. (Ulrike) Ravens-Sieberer and M. (Michael) Herdman

Abstract

Background: The objectives of the study were to develop web-based Spanish and Catalan versions of the EQ-5D-Y, and to compare scores and psychometric properties with the paper version. Methods: Web-based and paper versions of EQ-5D-Y were included in a cross-sectional study in Palafolls (Barcelona), Spain and administered to students (n=923) aged 8 to 18years from 2 primary and 1 secondary school and their parents. All students completed both the web-based and paper versions during school time with an interval of at least 2h between administrations. The order of administration was randomized. Participants completed EQ-5D-Y, a measure of mental health status (the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire), and sociodemographic variables using a self-administered questionnaire. Parents questionnaire included parental level of education and presence of chronic conditions in children. Missing values, and floor and ceiling effects were compared between versions. Mean score differences were computed for the visual analogue scale (VAS). Percentage of agreement, kappa index (k) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were computed to analyze the level of agreement between web-based and paper versions on EQ-5D-Y dimensions and VAS. Known groups validity was analyzed and compared between the two formats. Results: Participation rate was 77% (n=715). Both formats of EQ-5D-Y showed low percentages of missing values (n=2, and 4 to 9 for web and paper versions respectively), and a high ceiling effect by dimension (range from 79% to 96%). Percent agreement for EQ-5D-Y dimensions on the web and paper versions was acceptable (range 89% to 97%), and k ranged from 0.55 (0.48-0.61, usual activities dimension) to 0.75 (0.68-0.82, mobility dimension). Mean score difference on the VAS was 0.07, and the ICC for VAS scores on the two formats was 0.84 (0.82-0.86). Both formats showed acceptable ability to discriminate according to self-perceived health, reporting chronic conditions, and mental health status. Conclusions: The digital EQ-5D-Y showed almost identical VAS scores and acceptable levels of agreement on dimensions. Both formats demonstrated acceptable levels of construct validity. Availability of the Spanish and Catalan web-version will facilitate its use in HRQOL assessment and in economic evaluation

Topics: Agreement web and paper versions, Children and adolescents, Digital version, Health related quality of life, Reliability, Validity
Year: 2015
DOI identifier: 10.1186/s12955-015-0271-z
OAI identifier: oai:repub.eur.nl:85058
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://repub.eur.nl/pub/85058 (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.