Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Determination and measurement of factors which influence propensity to cycle to work

By John Parkin


2.89% of the UK population cycled for the journey to work as measured by the census in 200I. This percentage is similar to the percentage from the 1991 census and indicates a levelling off in the decline that had been seen in the previous two decades in bicycle use for the journey to work, but does not demonstrate any increase in line with policy aspirations.\ud \ud Choice is a complex issue and related to a wide range of factors including socio-economic variables and the nature of transport infrastructure and the physical geography of an area. As well as the rational and measurable factors, there are many much more complex and subtle factors including the influences of culture and social norms. Changes to behaviour probably take an extended period of time and require a range Qf conditions to be appropriate before a positive choice can be made.\ud \ud Waldman (1977) undertook the last countrywide aggregate study of the variation in use of the bicycle for the journey to work, but a number of the variables he constructed were measured inappropriately, not the least of which was his measure for "danger", which he recommended\ud for further study. It is widely considered that perception of risk from motor traffic is a reason why many people do not currently use the bicycle. This is only one measurable attribute and European bicycle planners consider network coherence, directness, attractiveness and comfort\ud as other equally important issues when designing schemes to promote bicycle use. This research has used primary data collected on perceptions of risk. The particular contribution of the research is in the development of a methodology for the determination of perception of risk for a whole journey, including routes and junctions, and the extension of this methodology to create a measure for risk at an area wide level.\ud \ud Measures that have been found to be significant in relation to the use of the bicycle for the journey to work are car ownership, socio-economic classification, ethnicity, distance to work, condition of the highway pavement, highway network density and population density, hi lIiness,\ud rainfall and mean temperature. In addition the length of bicycle lane, length of bus lane and length of traffic free route have also been found to be important in so far as it influences the perception of risk, which in turn influences the level of bicycle use. The length of route that is\ud signed has also been found to be important. In a sample of four districts for which appropriate data is available, a seven fold increase in route length with cycle facilities, or signed route, would create conditions suitable for an increase in cycle use for the journey to work by a factor\ud of the order of two. An elimination of highways with negative residual life would create conditions suitable for an increase of 10% in the number of bicycle trips for the journey to work

Publisher: Institute for Transport Studies (Leeds)
Year: 2004
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). An efficient means of transport: experiences with cycling policy in The Netherlands. Chapter in Planning for cycling - principles, practice and solution for urban planners.
  2. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage series in quantitati\e applications in the social sciences.
  3. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression.
  4. (2003). Appraising short-cuts. Geography and transport planning BA Leeds University dissertation.
  5. (1982). Bicycling Science. 2 nd Edition.
  6. (1998). Casualties in cycle paths. Open letter to John Grimshaw of Sustrans dated
  7. (1998). Contributions to bicycle-automobile mixed-traffic science: beha\ioural models and engineering applications.
  8. (1995). Cycling in Great Britain. Available at Fajans,
  9. (1991). Econometric models and economic forecasts. 3rd Edition.
  10. (1997). Effect of variation in seat tube angle at different seat heights on sub-maximal cycling performance in man. Journal oJsports sciences.
  11. (2003). Energy laws in human travel behaviour New journal (~f physics Vol.
  12. (2004). Estimating the risk of collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles at signalized intersections. Accident analysis and prevention,
  13. (1982). Guide to forecasting travel demand with direct utility assessment. United States Department of Transportation, Urban [\lass Transportation Administration, Report UTMA-NH-l1-0001-82-1,
  14. (1990). Guidelines for urban safety management. Institution of Highways and Transportation.
  15. (1984). Linear probability, logit and probit models. Sage series in quantitative applications in the social sciences.
  16. (2000). Local Transport Plan 2001102 - 2005/06. Lancashire County Council.
  17. (1996). Maximal muscle power output in cycling: a modelling approach. Journal oJsports sciences.
  18. (1999). Methodological considerations in the determination of projected frontal area of cyclists.
  19. (1996). Optimized and corrected peak power output during friction-braked cycle ergometry.
  20. (2001). Promoting urban cycling through local road hierarchies. Working papers in transport, energy and the environment.
  21. (1998). Recycling our cities.
  22. (1998). Safestar, work package 7. Design of major urban junctions - comprehensive report. VTr EC 2. DIT (undated). Focus group report on shared use pedestrian and cycle facilities. Unpublished report by
  23. (2004). The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries.
  24. (1997). Transport in the urban environment. Institution of Highways and Transportation.
  25. (2001). Why bicyclists hate stop signs.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.