Location of Repository

An empirical investigation of expertise matching within academia

By Ping Liu

Abstract

Many Organizations have realized that effective management of their knowledge assets is important to survival in today s competitive business environment. Consequently an Organizational Memory (OM) is used to store what has been learned from the past in order that it can be reused by current and future employees. Information retrieval techniques have been widely used to facilitate the retrieval of the right information in an OM at the right time. However, access to information alone is not sufficient since not all knowledge can be transferred into explicit documentation. Expertise, as one of the most important knowledge assets, is normally stored in people s heads and is difficult to codify. Expertise is shared when people communicate with each other. Therefore, finding the right person with the right expertise is recognized as being at least as important as retrieving documents. The typical approaches to find experts include knowledge brokers and expertise database. However, the former approach is impractical in large organizations and geographically disparate organizations whilst the latter approach relies heavily on individuals to specify their expertise and keep updated. This thesis focuses on two questions: (1) How to integrate multiple expertise indications existing in an organizational memory as complementary to the description by experts? (2) How to insure the relevant experts are not overlooked as well as irrelevant experts are minimized? To solve these problems, a conceptual model has been developed so that multiple expertise indications existing in the organizational memory can be semantically integrated. The heterogeneous data sources are integrated by using RDF(S) since RDF allows for a uniform representation of data and RDF Schema represents the conceptual model. In addition, the expertise profiles are extended to include both keyword form and concept form based on the domain ontology; this combined profile integrates the advantages of both keyword search and concept search. A prototype system, which aims to help PhD applicants locate their potential supervisors, has been designed and implemented to test the techniques and ideas. The results of the experiments using real data at the University of Leeds demonstrate the improved performance of expertise matching and also show the advantages of applying semantic web technologies (such as RDF, RDFS, ontologies) to the expertise matching problem.\u

Publisher: School of Computing (Leeds)
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:1318

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2001). A Phenomenology of Skill Acquisition as the basis for a Merleau-Pontian Non-representationalist Cognitive Science”. Available from http://istsocrates.berkeley.edu/~hdreyfus/pdf/MerleauPontySkillCogSci.pdf [Duan
  2. (1975). A Vector Space Model for Information Retrieval,”
  3. (1981). Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs,
  4. (1998). Agents for Collaborative Information Exploration,”
  5. (1999). Agents for Expertise Location,”
  6. (2002). An Agent Based Approach to Finding Expertise,”
  7. (2001). An Expert Recommendation System using Concept-based Relevance Discernment,”
  8. (2000). An Expertise Finding Agent.
  9. (1996). Answer Garden 2: Merging Organizational Memory with Collaborative Help,”
  10. (2000). Assessing thesaurus-based query expansion using the UMLS Metathesaurus,”
  11. (2003). Automatic ontology-based knowledge extraction from Web documents,”
  12. (1998). Building a Learning Organization”. in Harvard Business Review on Knowledge Management.
  13. (1998). Changing Focus on Interoperability in Information Systems: from System, Syntax, Structure to Semantics,” in Interoperating Geographic Information Systems,
  14. (1998). Considering an Organization’s Memory,”
  15. (2002). Designing Competence Systems: Towards Interest-Activated Technology,”.
  16. (1989). Expertise and Intelligent Thinking: When is it Worse to Know Better,”
  17. (2002). Expertise Management – and Beyond”. White paper in RGS Associates. Available on-line at http://www.rgsinc.com/ publications/pdf/white_papers/Expertise_Management_and_Beyond.pdf [O’Riordan and Sorensen,
  18. (2001). Exploiting A Controlled Vocabulary to Improve Collection Selection and Retrieval Effectiveness,”
  19. (1999). Exploring Support for Knowledge Management in Mobile Work,”
  20. (1999). Federated Information Systems: Concepts, Terminology and Architectures Forschungsberichte des Fachbereichs Informatik 99-9, available online http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/busse99federated.html [Bussell and Holter,
  21. (2000). For Knowledge, Look Within - Businesses are discovering the value of internal infomediaries,” Knowledge Management Magazine,
  22. (1998). GMD-FIT.CSCW
  23. (1998). Huang, A:
  24. (2003). Humanizing the net: Social navigation with a ‘know-who’ email agent,”
  25. (1990). Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis,”
  26. (2002). Information vs. Knowledge: The Role of intranets in Knowledge Management,”
  27. (2000). Internet-based Organizational Memory and Knowledge Management Hershey, Pa. Idea Group Publishing [Seligman and Rosenthal,
  28. (2002). Knowledge Management in Libraries, New Delhi, Ess Ess 2002, viii, 288 p., ISBN 81-7000-331-8 REFERENCE 157 [Marchant,
  29. (1998). Knowledge Sharing Agents over the World Wide Web,”
  30. (2001). Leveraging Tacit Organisational Knowledge,”
  31. (2002). Measuring the Impact of University Research on Innovation,” In
  32. (1998). MEMOIR - Software Agents for Finding Similar Users by Trails,”
  33. (1999). Modern Information Retrieval, Imprint Addison-Wesley Longman,
  34. (2003). N.(2003) “Identifying communities of practice through ontology network analysis,”
  35. (1996). Object fusion in mediator systems,”
  36. (2000). OBSERVER: An Approach for Query Processing in Global Information Systems based on Interoperation across Pre-existing Ontologies,” in International journal on Distributed And Parallel Databases (DAPD),
  37. (2000). Ontology-based Information Selection Ph.D. Dissertation,
  38. (2003). Ontologybased Knowledge Management at Work: The Swiss Life Case Studies,” in Towards The Semantic Web – Ontology-driven Knowledge Management. Edited by
  39. (1999). Ontoseek: Content-based access to the web,” in
  40. (2002). OntoShare: Using Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing,”
  41. (1996). Ordille, J.(1996) “Querying Heterogeneous Information Sources Using Source Descriptions,”
  42. (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice,
  43. (1999). Organizational Memory: Knowledge Acquisition, Integration, and Retrieval Issues in Knowledge-Based Systems,
  44. (1997). Organizing genius: the secrets of creative collaboration,
  45. (1997). Referral Web: Combining Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering,”
  46. (2002). Requirements for a Web Ontology Language”. W3C Working Draft 07
  47. (1995). Research Problems in Data Warehousing,”
  48. (2000). Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0”, in World Wide Web Consortium,
  49. (1996). Rethinking the Future. Nicholas Brealey Publishing,
  50. (1971). Ruggles,
  51. (2003). Sharing expertise: beyond knowledge management.
  52. (2002). SiemensIndustrialServices: Turning Know-how into results,” in Knowledge Management Case Book: Siemens best practises (2 nd
  53. (1982). SIRIUS: Systems for Distributed Data Management,”
  54. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise,
  55. (1995). The Collective Stance in Modeling Expertise in Individuals and Organizations,” available online at http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/articles/Collective/Collective2.html [Garcia-Molina et al.,
  56. (1997). The Hidden Web,” in AI Magazine,
  57. (2003). The Human Side – A successful deployment of KM requires more than selecting tools,” in Knowledge Management Magazine,
  58. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics of Innovation,
  59. (2002). the next generation knowledge management,” in Knowledge Management Case Book: Siemens best practises (2nd edition), edited by
  60. (1998). The Phenomemnon of Knowledge Management: What Does it Mean to the Information Profession?” available online at http://www.sla.org/pubs/serial/io/1998/may98/broadben.html [Bull
  61. (2002). The power of communities: How to build Knowledge Management on a corporate level using a bottom-up approach,” in Knowledge Management Case Book: Siemens best practises (2nd edition), edited by
  62. (1999). The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties
  63. (1999). Use of Virtual Science Park Resource Rooms to Support Group Work in a Learning Environment,”
  64. (2000). Using OIL for Intelligent Information Integration,”
  65. (2000). What Is in the World of Work and Working: Some Implications of the Shift to Knowledge Work,” in The Knowledge Management Yearbook,
  66. (1999). What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?”
  67. (1998). Why RDF model is different from the XML model,” available online: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDF-XML.html [Bishop,
  68. (2000). Working With Knowledge: How Information Professionals Help Organizations Manage What They Know,” Library Management, Vol.21 No.8,
  69. (1999). WWW based collaboration with the BSCW System,”
  70. (1999). Xerox Shares Its Knowledge,” in Management Review,
  71. (1999). XSL Tranformations (XSLT),” W3C Recommendation November, 1999, http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt [Clark et al.,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.