Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Design of spatial interfaces for engineering assembly within a virtual environment for automotive design

By Yao Liu


This thesis presents studies on the design of a novel two-handed spatial interface for engineering assembly, informed by a number of qualitative studies using a realistic assembly model within a fully working virtual environment (VE). The results show that the two-handed spatial interface has the potential to reduce task-performance times by more than 25%, over an existing one-handed spatial interface. The VE is the IVPS (Interactive Virtual Prototyping System) at University of Leeds, which supports interactive engineering assembly. The main contribution of this research is to demonstrate an improved understanding of task performance for engineering assembly. \ud \ud By understanding the assembly task-performance through the evaluation of the existing IVPS using a desktop-based interface, the strengths and weakness of the existing interaction techniques are studied. The results strongly suggest that there is a need to know if more expressive spatial interaction could improve the task-performance for engineering assembly within a VE. \ud \ud By understanding the assembly task-performance through an evaluation of a one-handed spatial interaction model within the IVPS, a number of problems in spatial selection and positioning have been identified. They are the problems of scale (such as selecting a very small feature from a component), slide (such as manipulating constrained components in an assembly), global precision (such as manipulating the entire scene in which some components are long way from the centre of rotation) and related precision (such as manipulating the selected component related to the other components). \ud \ud A novel cube-based two-handed spatial interface has therefore been designed to overcome these problems in spatial selection and positioning. It assigns to the nondominant hand tasks such as positioning that can be performed by a sequence of 1DOF sub-tasks. This leaves the dominant-hand to perform the tasks such as 6DOF manipulation of assemblies, selection and attachment. This interface uses a physical cube to provide the user with a spatial frame of reference. The evaluation results show that the cube-based two-handed spatial interface has the potential to reduce the task-performance time by more than 25%, over the existing one-handed spatial interface. A tentative hypothesis is finally generalized and offers opportunities for further research.\u

Publisher: School of Computing (Leeds)
Year: 2003
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1986). (Eds.): User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Erlbaum,
  2. (1996). [Kiyokawa et al 1996b] 130
  3. (1986). A study in two-handed input”,
  4. (1995). A virtual reality environment for synthesizing spherical fourbar mechanism”,
  5. (1997). An empirical evaluation of graspable user interfaces: towards specialized, space multiplexed input”,
  6. (1995). An intergrated environment to visually construct 2D animantions”,
  7. (2002). Application and taxonomy of Through-The-Lens techniques”,
  8. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research:
  9. (1983). Boud et al
  10. (1991). Chryssolouris et al
  11. (1998). Comparing single- and two-handed 3D input for a 3D object assembly task”, CHI’98 Conference, Los Angels,
  12. (2002). Comparing Voodoo Dolls and HOMER: Exploring the importance of feedback in Virtual Environments”,
  13. (2001). Creating a virtual environment for spatial mechanism design”,
  14. (1983). Design and validation of matching tests to form equal groups for tracking experiments”,
  15. (1983). Design for assembly – a designer’s handbook”.
  16. (1993). Developing User Interface: Ensuring Usability Through Product and Process.
  17. (1994). Dewar et al
  18. (1999). E.G.: Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. [Lindeman et al
  19. (1990). Exploration and virtual camera control in virtual three dimensional environments”,
  20. (1999). Exploring bimanual camera control and object manipulation in 3D graphics interfaces”,
  21. (2000). Geometric modeling and collaborative design in a multimodal multi-sensory virtual environment”,
  22. (1987). Hand, C.: “A survey of 3D interaction techniques”,
  23. (1995). Human factors in virtual environments for the visual analysis of scientific data”, NCSA Publications: National Centre for Supercomputer Applications,
  24. (1994). JDCAD: A highly interactive 3D modeling system”,
  25. (1994). Kalawsky, R.S.: “VRUSE – a computerized diagnostic tool: for usability evaluation of virtual/synthetic environment systems”,
  26. (1989). Maxfield et al
  27. (2001). PROSSEIA-VR: Training in virtual environments”, Computer Graphic Topics – Reports from the INI-GraphicsNet, vol.5,
  28. (1998). Quantifying coordination in multiple DOF movement and its application to evaluating 6 DOF input devices”,
  29. (2000). The cubic mouse: a new device for tree-dimensional input”,
  30. (1994). The PHANToM Haptic Interface: A device for probing virtual objects”,
  31. (1999). The virtual palette and the virtual remote control panel: a device and an interaction paradigm for the Responsive Workbench TM”,
  32. (1994). The Virtual Reality Casebook,
  33. (1997). THRED: A two-handed design system”, Multimedia Systems Journal, Volume 5, Number 2,
  34. (2000). ToolStone: Effective use of the physical manipulation vocabularies of input devices”, UIST,
  35. (1994). Towards modeling of assemblies for product design”,
  36. (2002). Two-handed assembly with immersive task planning in virtual reality”, Virtual Reality
  37. (1995). User interface constraints for immersive virtual environment applications”, Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Center
  38. (1994). Virtual prototyping – an approach using VR-techniques”,
  39. (1999). Virtual reality as a tool for verification of assembly and maintenance processes,
  40. (1998). Virtual Reality: past, present, and future”,
  41. (2001). Virtual Training for a Manual Assembly Task”, Haptics-e,
  42. (1991). Visualization in computational fluid dynamics, a case study”,
  43. (1983). W.W: “A comparison of rating scale, secondary task, physiological, and primary-task workload estimation techniques in a simulated flight task emphasizing communications load”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.