Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Performing practices in late-nineteenth-century piano playing

By Neal Peres Da Costa


Early piano recordings provide audible evidence of the style of late- nineteenth and early twentieth century pianists. These clearly exhibit an approach to piano playing which differs radically from the present. The relationship between the practices preserved in the\ud recordings and their description in contemporaneous written texts is the focus of attention here. The investigation shows that the important features of recordings are not faithfully conveyed by the written texts. Therefore, the recordings reveal a manner of execution and interpretation that could seldom have been envisaged from the written texts alone.\ud \ud The recordings examined here include those of a generation of pianists who were trained, in some cases, 150 years ago. These include Carl Reinecke, Theodor Leschetizky,Camille Saint-Satins, and Johannes Brahms, and those of a later generation have also been considered. Their recordings preserve vital information about general performing\ud practices of the second half of the nineteenth century, as well as the idiosyncrasies of their playing.\ud \ud The significance of early recordings and their importance\ud as a means of appreciating lost traditions is outlined in the Introduction. Chapter 1 explores the early recording processes and draws conclusions about the value of the recordings as preserved evidence. The following chapters investigate practices that are prevalent in the recordings. These include dislocation (asynchrony of the hands), unnotated chordal arpeggiation, metrical rubato and various types of rhythmic alteration, and tempo modification. Each chapter compares contemporaneous and historical written references with numerous recorded examples provided on the accompanying compact discs. This process reveals, in many\ud cases, striking inconsistencies, and highlights the gulf between theory and practice. It also suggests that descriptive language and musical notation have hidden meanings for which the recordings provide an indispensable key.\ud \ud Early piano recordings capture an expressive style alien to modern taste. The implications of this study are that any attempt at historically informed performances must\ud acknowledge the gulf between current aesthetics of performance and those of the late nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries

Publisher: School of Music (Leeds)
Year: 2001
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. 13 to 72, Brahms, denoised version with electronic overlay.
  2. Diva,
  3. Diva, bars 43 to 45,
  4. Diva, bars 44 to 47,
  5. Grieg To Spring Op.
  6. (1998). Methode de piano du conservatoire (Paris, 1804/5). Anon., `Busopi: by one of his pupils', The Pianola Journal: The Journal of the Pianola Institute
  7. Mozart Fantasie K 475, bar 1,
  8. Mozart Larghetto arr, by Reinecke,
  9. Mozart Larghetto arr. by Reinecke,
  10. Mozart Larghetto arr. by Reinecke, bars I to 10,
  11. Mozart Larghetto arr. by Reinecke, bars I to 4,
  12. Op. 48, first movement, bars 1 to 5, Steven Lubin and the Academy of Ancient Music.
  13. Op. 58, third movement, bars 1 to 20, Moiseiwitsch.
  14. Romance in C,
  15. (1980). Rubato', The New Grove Dictionary of Music
  16. second half of bar 32 and first half of bar 33,
  17. Sonata Op. 7, fourth movement,
  18. Sonata Op. 7, third movement,
  19. (1964). The Great Pianists,
  20. to 20, de Lara.
  21. to 26, de Lara.
  22. Voi the sapete', piano introduction,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.