This paper reexamines the separation of commercial and investment banking in the
context of modern wholesale financial environment, dominated by a small cohort of
“systemic” institutions. The paper traces the pathology of regulation and deregulation
from the watershed events of the 1930s to the systemic financial failures of the recent
past. It then considers the structure, conduct and performance of the wholesale financial
industry and how firms that cannot be allowed to collapse get that way. Based on the
industrial organization of global wholesale finance, the paper then examines the
available regulatory techniques, and makes some judgments as to their relative promise
in promoting future financial stability with least possible dislocation of financial
efficiency, proposing benchmarks for the calibration of proposals for regulatory reform.
The paper then evaluates functional separation and carve-outs of high-risk activities that
cannot defensibly be conducted within systemic financial firms in the real world of power
politics and regulatory capture. The paper concludes that blanket condemnation of the
functional-separation features of the 1930s financial reforms is unwarranted in the light
of ongoing experience, and that it is time to revisit this issue in reconfiguring the global
wholesale financial architecture
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.