Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Threats: power, family mealtimes and social influence

By Alexa Hepburn and Jonathan Potter


This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: HEPBURN, A. and POTTER, J., 2011. Threats: power, family mealtimes and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50 (1), pp. 99-120, which has been published in final form at This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.One of the most basic topics in social psychology is the way one agent influences the\ud behaviour of another. This paper will focus on threats, which are an intensified form of\ud attempted behavioural influence. Despite the centrality to the project of social psychology\ud little attention has been paid to threats. This paper will start to rectify this oversight. It\ud reviews early examples of the way social psychology handles threats and highlights key\ud limitations and presuppositions about the nature and role of threats. By contrast, we\ud subject them to a programme of empirical research. Data comprise video records of a\ud collection of family mealtimes that include pre-school children. Threats are recurrent in this\ud material. A preliminary conceptualization of features of candidate threats from this corpus\ud will be used as an analytic start point. A series of examples are used to explicate basic\ud features and dimensions that build the action of threatening. The basic structure of the\ud threats uses a conditional logic: if the recipient continues problem action/does not initiate\ud required action then negative consequences will be produced by the speaker. Further\ud analysis clarifies how threats differ from warnings and admonishments. Sequential analysis\ud suggests threats set up basic response options of compliance or defiance. However,\ud recipients of threats can evade these options by, for example, reworking the unpleasant\ud upshot specified in the threat, or producing barely minimal compliance. The implications for\ud broader social psychological concerns are explored in a discussion of power, resistance and\ud asymmetry; the paper ends by reconsidering the way social influence can be studied in\ud social psychology

Topics: Social psychology, Threats, Interviews, Discursive psychology, Conversation analysis, Families, Family mealtimes, Eating
Publisher: Wiley (© British Psychological Society)
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1348/014466610X500791
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.