Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Should students participate in curriculum design? Discussion\ud arising from a first year curriculum design project and a\ud literature review

By C Bovill, K Morss and Catherine Bulley

Abstract

This paper outlines some of the findings from a QAA (Scotland) funded project exploring first year curriculum design (Bovill et al. 2008). Whilst many examples exist of curricula being designed in ways to engage first year students, there are fewer published examples of active student participation in curriculum design processes. In the current higher education context where student engagement in learning is emphasised (Carini et al,\ud 2006), this paper asks more generally whether students should be actively participating in curriculum design.\ud In order to answer this question, several elements of the project findings are explored: student views gathered in focus groups; staff views collected in workshops; and the case studies where students were actively involved in curriculum design. The data are examined for lessons that inform the debate about whether students should be participating in curriculum design, in first year and at other levels. Alongside these findings, relevant literature is critiqued in order to ascertain the desirability and feasibility of adopting curriculum design approaches that offer opportunities for active student participation

Publisher: Liverpool Hope University
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:552

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A critique of participative discourses adopted in networked learning,
  2. (1994). A different perspective on educational equality, doi
  3. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation, doi
  4. (2003). A popular education approach to tackling environmental injustice and widening participation,
  5. (2008). Assessment as a driver for transformational change in HE, ESCalate newsletter Number 10 Spring.
  6. (2003). Beyond the methods fetish: toward a humanizing pedagogy, In
  7. (2003). Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction, In
  8. (2008). Curriculum design for the first year, First Year Enhancement Theme Report, doi
  9. (1916). Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education, doi
  10. (2004). Enlightened universities: beyond political agendas, Edinburgh: Policy Institute Series: Society No. 4. Should students participate in curriculum design?
  11. (2008). Final report from Joint Quality Review group to Council. Scottish Funding Council,
  12. (2002). For a radical higher education after postmodernism,
  13. (2003). From pedagogy of the oppressed, In doi
  14. (2005). Handbook of enquiry and problem-based learning. Irish case studies and international perspectives,
  15. (2005). Handbook of enquiry and problem-based learning. Irish case studies and international perspectives, All Ireland Society for Higher Education.
  16. (1997). Higher education: a critical business, Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press. Should students participate in curriculum design?
  17. (2005). Introduction: radicalising intellectual work, In
  18. (2005). Learning environmental justice through dialogue, PASCAL Conference Proceedings: Making Knowledge Work.
  19. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. Core concepts of transformation theory, In Mezirow, doi
  20. (2000). Negotiation in tertiary education: clashes with the dominant educational culture, In
  21. (2000). Negotiation, process, content and participants’ experience in a process syllabus for ELT professionals, In
  22. (2003). No beginners: teaching participation at the graduate level,
  23. (1981). On analysing hegemony. In
  24. (1981). Politics and higher education in the 1980s, In
  25. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning, doi
  26. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages, doi
  27. (2000). Syllabus negotiation in a school of nursing, In
  28. (1994). Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom, doi
  29. (2001). The Case for Participation as Tyranny, In doi
  30. (2006). The curriculum? That′s just a unit outline, isn′t it? doi
  31. (2005). The methodology of ‘systemisation’ and its relevance to the academy, In
  32. (2000). The practicalities of negotiation, In
  33. (2000). The Significance of negotiation, In

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.