Location of Repository

An audit of a radiotherapy review clinic for breast cancer patients: a multi-disciplinary approach

By JL Cameron, Christine Blyth and Alanah Kirby

Abstract

Purpose: With the advent of multi-disciplinary team working in Oncology practice, this audit was designed to assess patient satisfaction with this approach within an on-treatment review clinic for breast cancer patients. It also aimed to look at conformity of reporting of treatment side effects between different staff groups. Patients and methods: A questionnaire was distributed to 230 radical breast cancer patients once a week after each review clinic. An oncologist and a radiographer or nurse reviewed the patients during weeks 1-4 of treatment. A review form was completed at each visit specifying any side effects noted. Results: Patients appeared satisfied with their clinic visits to both the radiographer and nurse with 84 and 85% confidence and trust in the members of staff compared to 73% with the doctor. There was disparity in the recording of side effects between non-medical and medical staff groups. Conclusion: This audit has provided good evidence to support the continuation of multi-disciplinary review clinics. A key benefit is the reduction in clinic waiting times for patients and a substantial time saving for the medics. It also supports role development for the radiographer and nurse involved. © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:730

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1999). 10 Year results after sector resection with or without post-operative radiotherapy for stage 1 breast cancer: a randomised trial. doi
  2. (1997). Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. doi
  3. An audit of a radiotherapy review clinic for breast cancer patients doi
  4. (2003). Assessment of quality of life in outpatients with advanced cancer: the accuracy of clinician estimations and the relevance of spiritual well-being—a Hoosier Oncology Group Study. doi
  5. (2002). Breaking the mould: roles, responsibilities and skills mix in Departments of Clinical Oncology. The Royal College of Radiologists,
  6. (2002). Building on success—future directions for the allied health professions in Scotland. Scottish Executive Health Department,
  7. (2005). Framework for role development in the allied health professions. Scottish Executive Health Department,
  8. (2001). Intervention for acute radiotherapy induced skin reactions in cancer patients: the development of a clinical guideline recommended for use by the College of Radiographers. doi
  9. (1999). Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breastcancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial. Lancet doi
  10. (1997). Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial. doi
  11. (2001). Radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery in small breast carcinoma: Long term results of a randomised trial. Ann Oncol
  12. (2000). Radiotherapy outpatient review: a nurse-led clinic. Clin Oncol doi
  13. (1996). Randomised controlled trial of conservation therapy for breast cancer: 6 year analysis of the Scottish Trial. Lancet doi
  14. (1997). Randomized trials with quality of life endpoints: are doctors’ ratings of patients’ physical symptoms interchangeable with patients’ self-ratings? Qual Life Res
  15. (1995). Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomised controlled clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. doi
  16. Role development for radiographers and radiography support staff within Scotland.
  17. Skincare of Patients Receiving Radiotherapy Best Practice Statement. NHS Quality Improvement, doi
  18. (1997). The developing role of the radiographer.
  19. (1991). The Patient’s Charter: A Charter for Health. doi
  20. (1999). The practice and process of therapeutic radiography: a professional perspective. College of Radiographers,
  21. (1995). The report by the expert advisory group on cancer to the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales: a policy framework for the commissioning of cancer services. Department of Health,
  22. (1988). Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.