Location of Repository

Do strict rules and moving images increase the reliability of sequential identification procedures?.

By Tim Valentine, Stephen Darling and Amina Memon

Abstract

Live identification procedures in England and Wales have been replaced by use of video, which provides a sequential presentation of facial images. Sequential presentation of photographs provides some protection to innocent suspects from mistaken identification when used with strict instructions designed to prevent relative judgements (Lindsay, Lea & Fulford, 1991). However, the current procedure in England and Wales is incompatible with these strict instructions. The reported research investigated whether strict instructions would enhance the reliability of identification from video. The effect of using moving rather than still video clips was also investigated. Participants witnessed a live staged incident, and attempted to identify the culprit later from police video lineups, which were run double-blind. Strict instructions produced a significantly lower rate of correct identifications in culprit present lineups, but did not significantly reduce the rate of mistaken identification in culprit absent lineups. Moving images yielded fewer mistaken identifications in culprit absent lineups

Publisher: Wiley
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:916

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2005). A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. doi
  2. (1998). Accuracy and confidence in person identification: The relationship is strong when witnessing conditions vary widely doi
  3. (2000). Actual innocence.
  4. (2003). Are police video identifications fair to African – Caribbean suspects? doi
  5. (1995). Choosing confidence and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relations in eyewitness identification studies. doi
  6. (1996). Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real lineups. doi
  7. (1994). Conceptual, practical and empirical issues associated with eyewitness identification test media. In: doi
  8. (1987). Correlations of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. doi
  9. (1984). Criminal Evidence Act doi
  10. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in memory. doi
  11. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. doi
  12. (2003). Eyewitness decisionsin simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual process signal detection theory analysis. doi
  13. (1989). Forensically-relevant moderators of the relationship between eyewitness identification accuracy and confidence. doi
  14. (1985). Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential presentation. doi
  15. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identifications: Putting context into context. doi
  16. (1980). On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications. doi
  17. (1992). Post-dicting eyewitness accuracy: confidence, decisiontimes and person descriptions of choosers and non-choosers. doi
  18. (1976). Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department on the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases.
  19. (1991). Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters. doi
  20. (2004). Sequential lineups: shift in criterion or decision strategy? doi
  21. (2001). Simultaneous and sequential lineups: decision processes of accurate and inaccurate witnesses. doi
  22. (2005). simultaneous lineups: A review of methods data and theory. doi
  23. (1998). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. doi
  24. (1987). The confidenceaccuracy relationship: The effects of confidence assessment and choosing. doi
  25. (2000). The effectiveness of video identification parades.
  26. (1984). The psychology of lineup identifications. doi
  27. (1988). the reliability of eyewitness identifications: Lineup construction and presentation. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.