Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Discrimination of Real and Sham Acupuncture Needles Using\ud the Park Sham Device: A Preliminary Study

By Chee-Wee Tan

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the blinding effectiveness of the\ud Park sham acupuncture device using participants’ ability to\ud discriminate between the real and sham acupuncture needles.\ud Design: The design was a yes-no experiment. Judgments\ud were made on whether the real or sham acupuncture needle was\ud administered.\ud Setting: University laboratory.\ud Participants: Healthy, acupuncture-naive university students\ud and staff (N20; median age, 22y; range, 18 – 48y) recruited through convenience sampling.\ud Interventions: Participants made yes-no judgments on\ud whether the real or sham needle was administered to 8 acupoints (4 traditional and 4 nontraditional) along the Pericardium meridian(Pericardium 3 to Pericardium 6) on the dominant forearm.\ud Main Outcome Measures: The accuracy index, d=, of participants’ ability to discriminate between the real and sham needles(discriminability) was computed for the traditional alone, the nontraditional alone, and a combination of both types of acupoints.\ud Results: The participants’ d= between the real and sham\ud needles was not statistically significant from d' = equal to 0 for the combined traditional and nontraditional acupoints comparison and the nontraditional acupoints alone comparison (combined, t(19)=1.20, P=.25; nontraditional, t(19)=.16, P=.87).\ud However, the participants’ d' = was statistically significant from d' = equal to 0 for the traditional acupoints comparison (t(19)=2.096, P=.049).\ud Conclusions: The Park sham acupuncture device appears to\ud be effective in blinding participants to real acupuncture intervention when it is applied to the nontraditional acupoints and when traditional and nontraditional acupoints are combined on the forearm along the pericardium meridian. However, the sham device does not appear to blind participants effectively when traditional acupoints alone are used for the same context.\ud Key Words: Acupuncture; Placebos; Rehabilitation; Signal\ud detection, psychological; Validation studies at topic

Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:948

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. A blinded randomised trial of acupuncture (manual and electroacupuncture) compared with a non-penetrating sham for the symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee. doi
  2. A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research. doi
  3. A placebo acupuncture needle with potential for double blinding: a validation study. doi
  4. Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomised non-penetrating sham controlled trial. doi
  5. Acupuncture for treatment of persistent arm pain due to repetitive use: a randomized controlled clinical trial. doi
  6. (2008). Available at: http://www.
  7. (2005). Creelman CD. Detection theory: a user’s guide. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;
  8. (1999). Development of a new sham needle. Acupunct Med
  9. (1998). Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research. doi
  10. Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures: principles and applications.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.