Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Creating intellectual capital : a Habermasian community of practice (CoP) introduction.

By D O'Donnell, G Porter, David McGuire and T Garavan

Abstract

John Seely Brown notes that context must be added to data and information to produce meaning. To move forward, Brown suggests, we must not merely look ahead but we must also learn to “look around” because learning occurs when members of a community of practice (CoP) socially construct and share their understanding of some text, issue or event. We draw explicitly here on the structural components of a Habermasian lifeworld in order to identify some dynamic processes through which a specific intellectual capital creating context, CoP, may be theoretically positioned. Rejecting the individualistic “Cogito, ergo sum” of the Cartesians, we move in line with Brown’s “we participate, therefore we are” to arrive within a Habermasian community of practice: we communicate, ergo, we create

Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:2125

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1994). Between facts and norms, Polity,
  2. (1981). Ca mbridge [first published as Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns,
  3. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning and identity, doi
  4. (2000). Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier”,
  5. (2000). Fieldbook on Collaborative Work Systems, Jossey-Bass,
  6. (2000). Fieldbook on Collaborative Work Systems, Jossey-Bass, (in press)
  7. (1999). Habermas, critical theory, and selves-directed learning”, doi
  8. (2003). Human interaction: The crit ical source of intangible value”, doi
  9. (2003). Human interaction: The critical source of intangible value”, doi
  10. (1998). Intellectua l capital; an exploratory st udy that develops measures and models”, doi
  11. (2000). Intellectual capital creation: A Habermasian perspective”, doi
  12. (2000). Intellectual capital creation: A Habermasian perspective”, Working Paper, The Intellectual Cap ital Research Inst itute of
  13. (1998). Intellectual capital; an exploratory study that develops measures and models”, doi
  14. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the new business landscape,
  15. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory, Orienta-Konsultit Oy,
  16. (2000). Leveraging the Social Life of Information in the E-Age: Idea Sparkers”, doi
  17. (2000). Leveraging the Social Life of Information in the E-Age: Idea Sparkers”, http://cml.indstate.e du/~libhard/ASIST2000x/brjsbsrh.html
  18. (2002). Mak ing Space for Communities of Practice: Creating Intellectual Capital through Co mmunicative Action”,
  19. (2002). Making Space for Communities of Practice: Creating Intellectual Capital through Communicative Action”,
  20. (2002). Philosophical foundations for a critical evaluation of the social impact of ICT”, doi
  21. (1981). Polity, Cambridge [first published as Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns,
  22. (2002). Reflexive Dialog ical Practice
  23. (2002). Reflexive Dialogical Practice doi
  24. (1996). Reflexivity and workgroup effectiveness: a conceptual integration”, In
  25. (2002). Strategic intellectual capit al creation: Decontextualizing strategy process research”, doi
  26. (2002). Strategic intellectual capital creation: Decontextualizing strategy process research”, doi
  27. (1996). Teaching Paradigm Shifting in Management Education: University Business Schools and the Entr epreneurial Imagination”, doi
  28. (1996). Teaching Paradigm Shifting in Management Education: University Business Schools and the Entrepreneurial Imagination”, doi
  29. (2000). Teams versus Communities of Practice”, http://www.melcrum.com/know_articles/COPs_teams.htm
  30. (1997). The new organizational wealth, Berrett-Koehler, doi
  31. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity , Polity, doi
  32. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity, Polity, doi
  33. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, doi
  34. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. doi
  35. (1996). Types of Group L earning”, In doi
  36. (1996). Types of Group Learning”, In doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.