Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Single outcome agreements and partnership working in Scottish local government - Year One

By Jung Jin Park and Richard Kerley

Abstract

Single Outcome Agreements (SOAs) are a mechanism that it is argued will deliver key national and local priorities based on a new relationship between central and local government in Scotland. SOAs are to be developed and implemented through partnership working exercised by Community Planning Partnerships (CPPs). A survey of the first (2008) SOA participants from local authorities and their Community Planning partners was conducted in 2008, with a particular focus on the interrelationships between the 2008 SOA development process and partnership working at the local level. Findings of this study suggest that there was a positive link between the strength of existing CPPs and partner engagement in the 2008 SOA development. However, partner engagement in the 2008 SOA development process did not affect survey respondents' confidence that the ongoing SOA development and implementation will strengthen partnership working in the long -term. This study also suggests that in addition to the practical difficulties such as limited time and staff resources, mistrust between local partners, and local players' scepticism about the central government's intention to free up local government may be barriers to the success of the SOA. Overall, respondents in this study showed realistic but hopeful attitudes to what the SOA was about and what could be achieved through it over time. The information gathered through this study should be merited as baseline data which captured the SOA participants' early experience and expectations. © 2011 Taylor & Francis

Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:2229

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). Community Planning: Fostering Participation in the Congested State? doi
  2. (2007). Community Strategies: Are they Delivering Joined Up Governance? Local Government Studies, doi
  3. (2005). Devolution and Local Government: Evidence from Scotland. doi
  4. (2007). Evaluating Local Strategic Partnerships: Theory and practice of change. doi
  5. (2004). From Community Government to Communitarian Partnership? Approaches to Devolution in Birmingham. doi
  6. (2002). Getting “Under the Skin" of Community Planning: Understanding Community Planning at the Community Planning Partnership Level. Local Government Report Commissioned by Community Planning Task Force.
  7. (2008). Improvement Service, & Solace
  8. (2002). Intergovernmental Relations in Scotland Post-Devolution. doi
  9. (2006). Joined up policy in practice? The coherence and impacts of the local government modernisation agenda. doi
  10. (2004). Like a Horse and Carriage or a Fish on a Bicycle: How Well do Local Partnerships and Public Participation go Together? Local Government Studies, doi
  11. (2001). Local Governance in Britain. doi
  12. (2004). Local Government Management Development in Scotland: A Study of Public Policy and its Implementation, doi
  13. (2008). Local government Modernisation in England: A Critical Review of the LGMA Evaluation Studies. Local Government Studies, doi
  14. (2008). Online Available: http://www.improvementservice.org.uk/coreprogrammes/single-outcome-agreements-/
  15. (2001). Partnership Working: policy and practice. The Policy Press: doi
  16. (2003). Scottish Executive (2004a) The Local Government in Scotland Act
  17. (2003). Scottish Executive (2004b) The Local Government in Scotland Act
  18. (2008). Single Outcome Agreement (SOAs) Guidance
  19. (2008). Single Outcome Agreement Briefing.
  20. (2008). SPICs briefing: Single Outcome Agreements. The Scottish Parliament (08/47).
  21. (2002). The Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA)
  22. (2004). The Modernisation of Local Decision Making: Public Participation and Scottish Local Government. Local Government Studies, doi
  23. (2002). The potential of project status to support partnerships. doi
  24. (2006). The three challenges of community leadership. doi
  25. (2005). the West of England & Warwick Business School
  26. (2007). Win-Win? Early Experience from Local Area Agreements. doi
  27. (2002). Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in public services. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.