Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A Reflection on the Introduction of a Peer and Self Assessment Initiative

By Kath MacDonald

Abstract

This paper discusses the introduction and evaluation of peer and self assessment\ud elements into two nursing modules, (one undergraduate, (UG) and one postgraduate,\ud (PG). 40 UG nursing students and 22 PG education students participated in a Peer and\ud self assessment exercise within their respective modules. Students evaluated the\ud process by questionnaire and made recommendations for future modules. 32 out of 40\ud (80%) undergraduate & 20 out of 22 (91%) post graduate students returned the\ud questionnaires. Over two-thirds of each group recommended introducing peer\ud assessment into their modules.\ud Students saw peer and self assessment as motivational, encouraging learning, and a\ud fair and truthful method of assessment. Weaknesses were seen as possibility of\ud personal bias, students unsure about their assessment skills and may disadvantage\ud quiet students or those with English as a second language. Both groups felt peer\ud feedback would further their own learning. Both groups scored their peers at the higher\ud end of the range of scores. Peer and self assessment is seen positively by UG and PG\ud students and is perceived to motivate, facilitate learning, and be fair. Consideration\ud must be given to less dominant group members, as quiet students do not necessarily\ud produce less effort. Peer and self assessment may help students develop sustainable\ud skills which can be used in the workplace, such as judgement and assessment of self\ud and others

Publisher: University of Glasgow
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:2294

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A Reflection on the Introduction of a Peer and Self Assessment Initiative Work in Progress Fulbrook,
  2. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. doi
  3. (2007). An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials. doi
  4. (2001). Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: the students' views. doi
  5. (1987). Assessing Students - how shall we know them? London: Harper and Row. doi
  6. (1998). Assessment in partnership with learners Assessment doi
  7. (1999). Critical reflective enquiry for knowledge development in nursing practice. doi
  8. (1997). Detecting gender bias in peer marking of students group process work. doi
  9. (2002). Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process. Assessment doi
  10. (2002). Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process. Assessment & Evaluation inMacDonald doi
  11. (1995). Enhancing Learning through self assessment. doi
  12. (2001). First year undergraduate experiences of group project work. doi
  13. (2000). Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students Assessment doi
  14. (2002). Guided Reflection; Advancing practice. doi
  15. (2005). Improving Assessment through student involvement. Oxon: Routledge Farmer, Falchikov,
  16. (2006). Learning-oriented assessment; principles and practice Assessment doi
  17. (1981). Management Teams: Why they succeed or fail., doi
  18. (1999). Peer and self assessment during problem based tutorials. doi
  19. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. doi
  20. (2002). Private thoughts in public spheres: issues in reflection and reflective practices in nursing'. doi
  21. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self assessment in higher education; a critical analysis of findings. doi
  22. (2001). Reciprocity as a Source of Bias in Multiple Peer Assessment of Group Work. doi
  23. (2008). Relationships between student characteristics and self-, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations. doi
  24. (2006). Retrieved Nov 09 from http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/documents/employability/Employability_Overview_QAA11 3.pdf Quality Assurance Agency Scotland
  25. (2005). Self and peer assessment: does it make a difference to student group work? doi
  26. (1988). Struggling with student assessment
  27. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. 2 nd edition,
  28. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. 2nd edition, doi
  29. (2001). The Effect of the Inclusion of Self assessment with Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project: a quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. doi
  30. (2011). The impact of stress in self- and peer assessment. doi
  31. (2006). The local practices of assessment. doi
  32. (1987). The Reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action Temple Smith, doi
  33. (2003). The theory and practice of learning. 2 nd Edition.
  34. (2003). The theory and practice of learning. 2nd Edition.
  35. (2007). Thinking and writing at Masters level: a reflective passage doi
  36. (2004). Training teachers in peerassessment skills: effects on performance and perceptions. doi
  37. (2002). Why fix assessment? all Ireland Society for Higher Education (aishe) Discussion paper Retrieved Sept 08 from http://www.aishe.org/resources/phil-race/whyfix1.html

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.