Location of Repository

Teams take the better risks

By B. Kuon, B. Mathauschek, A. Sadrieh and Bonn Univ. (Germany). Sonderforschungsbereich 303 - Information und die Koordination Wirtschaftlicher Aktivitaeten

Abstract

Many important economic and political decisions are made by teams. In the economic literature, however, the decision units are frequently modeled as individual economic agents. The paper experimentally investigates the question to what extent observed team decisions under risk are actually consistent with the principles of rational choice, specifically the principles of Expected Utility Theory (EUT) and of Portfolio Selection Theory (PST). The experiment is performed with individuals and teams. We find almost no evidence for the greater compliance of team decisions than of individual decisions with the principles of EUT. However, there is substantial evidence for the consistency of team decisions with the PST. Compared to individuals, teams accumulate significantly more expected value at a significantly lower total risk (measured in SD). We introduce a team decision algorithm, excess-risk vetoing, that combines simple majority voting with the right to veto alternatives providing additional risk that is not compensated by additional expected value. We find that the results of our experiment are well explained by the excess-risk vetoing. (orig.)Available from TIB Hannover: RO 3009(452) / FIZ - Fachinformationszzentrum Karlsruhe / TIB - Technische InformationsbibliothekSIGLEDEGerman

Topics: 05A - Management, administration, business studies, DECISION UNDER RISK, GROUP DECISION, EXPECTED UTILITY, PORTFOLIO SELECTION
Year: 1999
OAI identifier:
Provided by: OpenGrey Repository
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://hdl.handle.net/10068/11... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.