Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The acceptability and impact of a randomised controlled trial of welfare rights advice accessed via primary health care: qualitative study

By Suzanne Moffatt, Joan Mackintosh, Martin White, Denise Howel and Adam Sandell
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1513564
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2006). A systematic review of the health, social and financial impacts of welfare rights advice delivered in health care settings. BMC Public Health
    2. A: Randomised controlled trial of welfare rights advice accessed via primary health care: pilot study.
    3. (2003). Assessing the quality of life of patients in phase I and II anti-cancer drug trials: interviews versus questionnaires. Soc Sci Med
    4. (2000). Citizens Advice Bureaux in general practice: an illuminative evaluation. Health and Social Care in the Community
    5. (1993). Citizens advice in general practice. BMJ
    6. (1997). Clinical trial participant satisfaction: survey of SHEO enrollees.
    7. (2003). Discrepancies between patients' assessments of outcome: qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial. BMJ
    8. (2000). Doing qualitative research.
    9. (1994). DW: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis.
    10. (2004). E: The impact of welfare advice in primary care: a qualitative study. Critical Public Health
    11. (2004). Evaluating the health effects of social interventions. BMJ
    12. (2003). Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses.
    13. (1997). Golding L: Evaluation of 4 CAT-funded Citizens' Advice Bureaux units. Birmingham, Soundings Research;
    14. (2002). Hamdy F: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: (ProtecT) study. BMJ
    15. (2006). Howel D: Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research - what happens when mixed method findings conflict?
    16. (1999). If we had not got referred and got the advice, I don't know where we'd be, it doesn't bear thinking about". The impact of welfare advice provided in general practice. A qualitative study. Newcastle upon Tyne, University of Newcastle upon Tyne;
    17. (1998). Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health.
    18. (2000). Lincoln YS: Handbook of Qualitative Research.
    19. (2002). LN: Nurse-led welfare benefits screening in a general practice located in a deprived area. Public Health
    20. (1992). Mixing Methods: qualitative and quantitative research.
    21. (2000). P: A citizen's advice service in primary care: improving patient access to benefits. Primary Care Research and Development
    22. (1985). Participation in a clinical trial: the patients' point of view. Control Clin Trials
    23. (2003). Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ
    24. (2003). Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Scientists.
    25. Randomised controlled trial to evaluate the health effects of welfare rights advice in primary health care: a pilot study.
    26. (1996). RJ: Participants' perceptions of a phase I colon cancer chemoprevention trial. Control Clin Trials
    27. (2004). Securing Good Health for the Whole Population.
    28. (1995). Thong YH: Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research. Soc Sci Med
    29. (2000). What do you advise doc? A Citizen's Advice Bureau
    30. (2002). Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?" The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Soc Sci Med

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.