Location of Repository

International ring trial of the epidermal equivalent sensitizer potency assay : reproducibility and predictive-capacity

By Marc A T Teunis, Sander W Spiekstra, Mieke Smits, Els Adriaens, Tobias Eltze, Valentina Galbiati, Cyrille Krul, Robert Landsiedel, Raymond Pieters, Judith Reinders, Erwin Roggen, Emanuela Corsini and Susan Gibbs

Abstract

This study describes the international ring trial of the epidermal-equivalent (EE) sensitizer potency assay. This assay does not distinguish a sensitizer from a non-sensitizer, but may classify known skin sensitizers according to their potency. It assesses the chemical concentration resulting in 50% cytotoxicity (EE-EC50) or the 2-fold increase in IL-1α (IL-1α2x). Four laboratories received 13 coded sensitizers. Reproducible results were obtained in each laboratory. A binary prediction model, EC50≥7 mg/ml=weak to moderate sensitizer and EC50<7 mg/ml=strong to extreme sensitizer had an accuracy of 77%. A superior EE (EC50 and IL-1α2x) correlation was observed with human in vivo DSA05 data compared to LLNA-EC3 data. Human in vivo NOEL and LLNA-EC3 data correlated to a similar extent to in vitro EE data. Our results indicate that this easily transferable EE potency assay is suitable for testing chemical allergens of unknown potencies and may now be ready for further validation, providing complementary potency information to other assays already undergoing validation for assessing skin sensitization potential

Topics: in vitro, epidermal equivalent, sensitizer potency, NOEL, human DSA05
Year: 2014
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.library.uu.nl:1874/305050
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://dspace.library.uu.nl:80... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.